“Hate On”
This phrase, “hate on”, is becoming quite popular and I am convinced it is some sort ploy like the phrase “give back.” Hate is an emotional reaction, so you can hate something but it is meaningless to say you hate on something. I think it is an attempt to divorce the emotion from the person. K thinks is an attempt to turn into some sort force, which automatically creates victims. I think it is a way of pushing moral relativism. The idea is that hating is bad no matter what the object of that hate. What do you think?
Previous comments... You are currently on page 3.
From the Ayn Rand Lexicon; "The “stolen concept” fallacy, first identified by Ayn Rand, is the fallacy of using a concept while denying the validity of its genetic roots, i.e., of an earlier concept(s) on which it logically depends." As you said, an attempt to divorce the emotion from the person.
Also consider the destruction of language. Separating the word from it's definition. Rendering clear communication impossible. Altruism becomes equal to charity, selfish is Bernie Madoff instead of Hank Rearden, and the Constitution becomes a "living document" subject to new interpretation.