

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 3.
just called for the baked-over and once-failed Hillary
plan plus all of the MIT Goober's "stupid public" tricks
which had been stacked up for years, and said,
"Let's pass this!"
and so it came to pass, I bet. . a mashed-together conglomerate
coagulation of pieces ill-designed and poorly-fit to reality. -- j
been passed down through the generations, how
can the "libtards" stomach this process of raping
inheritances? . makes me go ballistic! -- j
do you define objectivist? . freedom lover to the
right of libertarian! -- j
(on medicare) has 2. . at one point, I reminded him
that he has no objective proof that he needed the
surgery -- he just believed the doctors. . they needed
him for the income. -- j
Aside from all the great comments on insurance and hospital management, doctors have been controlling their monopoly on healthcare for ever. The AMA, not government, controls enrollment, and silly terms of study and forced apprenticeship to make it to their lofty realm of being able to prescribe penicillin. There are some pretty smart doctors, but there are even more that simply are practically incapable of critical evaluation. They simply match diagnosis and treatment with experience, not biology and physiology.
It became so obvious and bad that we now have the Nurse Practitioner or Physician's Assistant. These more simply and efficiently trained people take care of a majority of medical issues, leaving the expensive stuff to the expensive doctors.
As freedomforall said, a free market in healthcare would lower costs faster than anything managed. If the government has to intervene, the money should go to the patient, not the service provide, and the patient should chose to spend the stipend how they see fit.
If there's ever another bill written with the "you've got to vote for it before you know what's in it" tag, all the politicos that vote for it should be taken out and hung from the street lights while the church wives club serve a cold chicken dinner with tater salad and baked beans. That is exactly what is going on with the "agreement" with Iran. Personally I'm happy that the Senators sent that letter to the high poobah in Iran. They should have "cc'd" Barry with a copy. It's time that his nibs starts getting his toes stepped on every time he does anything (except resign).
In summary, the answer is NOT government. The answer is to go back to individual costs, care and so on.
It's crazy. And we are expected to foot that bill.
The small hospital in my town used to be affiliated with Columbia Presbyterian. It changed hands and is now part of the Western CT Health Network. Since then, the maternity ward has been shut down, and now the latest is the er is being phased out to only have two beds. BUT, it has a stellar cancer treatment center, and is getting a new cardiac wing. The thing is, around here, which is mostly rural, there are all sorts of reasons people use the emergency room. Farm accidents, builders and other trades use it. I did last September when I got stitches.... (Long stupid story. Typical spazz me...)
Point is, it's shrinking in the areas that get a lot of use. People are losing their jobs. And I mean surgeons, er nurses, the gamut of those who provide care in the specialties that are becoming phased out. It concerns me, because the other two hospitals are not exactly close...
Load more comments...