IT'S HAPPENING: Atlas Shrugged Television Series
At the start of the year, Atlas Shrugged Producer John Aglialoro hinted at the potential for an Atlas Shrugged mini-series ( http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/posts... ). Last week, John made a trip to Hollywood and met with... some very interested MAJOR players.
How does a full blown television series sound!?
Yep. It's really happening. We can't say too much just yet, but suffice it to say, John's meetings in Hollywood were VERY productive and the groups we're talking to are incredibly enthusiastic and ready to move mountains to make it happen. We should hopefully have something official to announce within the next few weeks so stay tuned.
As the project progresses, we're going to be reaching out to you for your opinion from time to time.
This would be one of those times.
Keep in mind, certain people who are not active in the Gulch, but very interested in your opinion, will be reading your comments on this post.
Got it? Good. Here we go...
Should the Atlas Shrugged television series be a period piece set in the 1950s or should it take place, as Ayn Rand alluded to, "the day after tomorrow?"
P.S. Because it worked so well for us with the trilogy, of course we have every intention of changing the entire cast every episode. No. No, we won't.
How does a full blown television series sound!?
Yep. It's really happening. We can't say too much just yet, but suffice it to say, John's meetings in Hollywood were VERY productive and the groups we're talking to are incredibly enthusiastic and ready to move mountains to make it happen. We should hopefully have something official to announce within the next few weeks so stay tuned.
As the project progresses, we're going to be reaching out to you for your opinion from time to time.
This would be one of those times.
Keep in mind, certain people who are not active in the Gulch, but very interested in your opinion, will be reading your comments on this post.
Got it? Good. Here we go...
Should the Atlas Shrugged television series be a period piece set in the 1950s or should it take place, as Ayn Rand alluded to, "the day after tomorrow?"
P.S. Because it worked so well for us with the trilogy, of course we have every intention of changing the entire cast every episode. No. No, we won't.
Previous comments...
Keep em guessing.....
But the further away the story gets from Ayn Rand's original, the more of it will be written by someone else. That is a major potential problem. She rarely let anyone speak for her or write for her when she was alive, because they always got it worng. So, the writing would have to be top notch, or it could be more bad than good.
I think it could really catch on,
Why does creating a tv series cause more excitement here than creating a real Atlantis?
Could we please, please have actors who can play the right age? This is a revolution fomented by people barely in their thirties! Having actors a decade or two older in key roles [Eric Allen Kramer, Joaquin de Almeida? Really.] is just wrong, wrong, wrong in so many ways. It would be so very important to demonstrate that this -- Objectivism -- is not an old-fogey shtick, but a truly revolutionary, never really been tried before, way out there way of organizing a society and an economic system, something that today's youth and young adults, mired in Federal Reserve joblessness and Obamacare submission to the system, could look at and say, yes, that would be leagues better than what's being force fed to me today.
And would somebody please get Dagny out of those peplum-jacketed suits and into some good Armani? Or just hire the costumer who put Jodie Foster in those great suits in Elysium. Chief Operating Officers don't wear the cutesy suits they kept putting Dagny into in those AS movies.
All in all, I can't wait.
Who will direct? The drama was drained form the movies so that key dramatic scenes were set off like wet squibs. Someone needs to acquire the one quarter of the Atlas screenplay written by Ayn Rand before she died, to see how she visualized AS as a MOVIE.
Who will hire the actors? Many characters in the movies were inappropriate, such as the Dagny of movie two, Hoyt Axton in movie one. Francisco in movie three.
Who will act in it?
I believe in this way, more of the book could be used and the length of the series could hopefully be determined by how long it takes to fully tell the whole story through at least five decades and not solely based on budgetary constraints to get the whole story crammed into two or three two hour movies. This is my suggestion and I hope I typed as I am thinking it. If others have presented similar ideas, I'm glad and please don't think I'm copying anyone else as I've not read any other suggestions yet. Thanks for your time, Neal V.
PS - I've seen a few comments about the use of trains as it was the best way to travel at the time Ayn Rand wrote her novel. But I do think that using the Trains and railway system in this country which now literally look like arteries and veins in a human body...Rail transport should be the only affordable means of transportation as in the movie showing gas prices over $40.00/gallon which is VERY relevant to the world today. It cost far more to move far less on a plane than in a train, plus the symbol of the train able to use coal, wood, petroleum, and then even the atmospheric engine John Galt designed. It would quite difficult to use planes as the hub. And if all things were equal to the book and movies...the setting back to rail transport for nearly everything would make even more sense on showing how the work for the sake of others and the disappearance of the best minds of the worlds population to the Gulch would be further reinforced. In comparison to flammable liquids created by man, going back to just being able to create fire with wood as all those who know or knew how to make fuels have disappeared and those left only can make a simple wooden fire.
It could also offer a means for same individuals to express their views.
I have a very liberal acquaintance who fairly bristles at Ayn Rand's name, thus ending any discussion of her work, let alone talk about why her philosophy is either right or wrong, good or bad.
That's rather sad, actually...
Load more comments...