Does Easy Money Support Stock Prices?

Posted by straightlinelogic 12 years, 2 months ago to Government
6 comments | Share | Flag

Anyone who believes a central bank can support asset prices faces a paradox. While the Federal Reserve is given much credit for indirectly supporting equity and other asset prices, the price of an asset class it is directly buying and explicitly supporting has gone down, not up. Since its latest round of quantitative easing commenced, treasury bond and note prices have dropped and interest rates have risen. Debt markets are recognizing the implications of interest rate suppression and government debt on future growth, and the ability to make interest and principal payments on that debt. Prices of riskier municipal debt have dropped even more. Risk premiums are increasing. If debt markets are getting nervous, equity owners, last in the distributional line, should be terrified.

If what emerges from the regulatory interpretations of the “Volker Rule,” which seeks to halt banks’ proprietary trading, actually does reduce such trading, shadow banking speculation will diminish. Equity markets will lose an important Federal Reserve erected prop. That may kick off the stock market’s downfall, or more likely, it will collapse of its own weight when rampant optimism in central bank policies can no longer avoid confronting those policies’ deleterious results. However it ends, it will end badly, probably in a crash, as everyone realizes at the same time that the Fed did not really have their backs. The future cannot support creditors’ claims on it, otherwise their would be no wealth tax trial balloons wafting through the air. If there is not enough for creditors, there will be nothing at all to satisfy the unrealistic, central bank-stoked expectations of equity owners.

This is an excerpt. The full article can be accessed on straightlinelogic.com, or by clicking the link above.
SOURCE URL: http://www.straightlinelogic.com/straightlinelogic/Blog-The_Latest/Entries/2013/12/9_Does_Easy_Money_Support_Stock_Prices.html


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by professorbean1942 12 years, 2 months ago
    As a professor of Personal Finance with a number of years on wall street, I have noted that public traded corporations are using their profits to move toward "going private" and this is the principal reason for the market highs. Dell
    Computer and H.J. Heinz to notable complete moves in that direction. Current economic conditions in the USA offer no better alternative. There are no growth opportunities as the Federal Reserve and BIG Government continue to crowd out the private sector. Repurchase of shares goes into treasury stock for future growth through acquisition while improving the debt to equity and price earnings per share ratios.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Danno 12 years, 2 months ago
    The FEDs official mandate is to control inflation and maximize employment. The latter goal was added during the 1960's IIRC. But does anyone else realize these two goals, low inflation and maximal employment, are contradictory? To pursue both goals the FED did something such like the Housing Bubble.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by salta 12 years, 2 months ago
      The phrase "mandate to control inflation" has very political origins, designed to give people the impression they need the Fed to save them from the evil of inflation. Its all smoke and mirrors.
      The actions the Fed is currently taking is, in fact, inflation. As the name implies, it is the inflation of the money supply in the economy (money printing). The CPI index is not inflation, it just represents ONE OF THE EFFECTS OF the inflation which the Fed is causing (another being wage increases).
      The well-hidden effect is that any inflation is like an imperceptible erosion of all US Dollar assets (stocks, bonds, housing, cash) effectively allowing the government to spend a small percentage of everybody's savings every year without permission.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Danno 12 years, 2 months ago
        Many have scratched their heads wondering why there is not more inflation (well food and fuel should be a concern). For now most of the new money ends up overseas exporting inflation and some at the FED as Bank Reserves that the FED PAYS INTEREST ON! Once foreigners shun the dollar all that money comes back. How will the FED control this when it needs to print more and more to fund the Treasury?
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Abaco 12 years, 2 months ago
    Last time I looked the Fed's role was to control unemployment, interest rates and inflation. But....your description, Danno, carries water.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Danno 12 years, 2 months ago
    The FEDs purpose is: 1) wash toxic assets off member banks balance, sheets ; 2) lower interest rate on T-Bill to keep Treasury solvent ; 3) inflate stock market to keep pensions solvent. The Wall Street banks take a cut of all this activity. The Volker Rule as written is so vague as to make no changes.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo