Hillary EMail: Critique and Samples of early MSM defenses (excuses)

Posted by MinorLiberator 4 years, 4 months ago to Politics
4 comments | Share | Flag

Here;s another good article that speaks for itself, and again I won't add much here. I like it because it's both an excellent criticism of Hillary and her email issue, interspersed with (I find) amusing early attempts by the MSM to dismiss it as "not serious".
SOURCE URL: http://thefederalist.com/2015/03/10/the-hillary-scandals-arent-about-personal-failings-theyre-about-corruption/?utm_source=The+Federalist+List&utm_campaign=4f886d2568-RSS_DAILY_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_cfcb868ceb-4f886d2568-83796321

Add Comment


All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by LITTLERED1977 4 years, 4 months ago
    The thought of having Hillary serve as the President of the US is nauseating. The lengths the media will go to in order to prop up her ability to run for the office will be very entertaining, to say the least. With a population over 300 million, surely we can find someone Not named Bush or Clinton.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 4 years, 4 months ago
      I've said it before, but will repeat as often as necessary (perhaps with an occasional rinse and spin thrown in): we don't need another Bush vs. Clinton. If it comes to that, Hillary will have survived her scandals, and Bush will lose (I think he'd lose to a speed-bump). Like you, I agree: neither Bush nor Clinton. I really don't care who The D is, if the R's can manage to pick a strong, reasonable candidate. For the Democrat Party, if not Hillary, then I'd guess Warren, for the profound reason that IT'S A WOMAN'S TURN! She would be, in my opinion a weaker candidate, and too far Left for even the current state of the country.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  


  • Comment hidden. Undo