They have never been my party either.

Snezzy, I sincerely hope that someone with the hacking skills redirects this page to one which looks just like it, but with the label for each picture changed from "DENIER" to "JUDEN!"

One point you need to make to the "climate change" people you may actually have a conversation with (the biggest fear of "progressives" is how to prevent their followers from actually engaging in reasoned debate, where facts can outweigh "feelings") is that there is no "free lunch" in getting from our use of carbon-based fuels to "clean" energy.

More than 70% of the world's power needs are met by use of carbon-based fuels (wood, coal, oil, kerosene, gasoline, natural gas, etc.). Another 20% is provided by nuclear sources (which many of the climate changers also despise). Another 7% is provided by hydroelectric sources (many of which the climate change crowd would also like to see eliminated to restore the natural flow of the Earth's waters - even if it means lots more flooding destruction), and the big hydro sources are pretty much tapped out, leaving only mini, micro, and nano hydro growth potential, but that's another story.

Only 3% of the world's power needs are currently provided by solar, wind, geothermal, or tidal power. If a radical reduction in the use of carbon-based fuels is necessary, then we should be seeing a call for a Manhattan-like effort to replace them, but we're not, because that would require a huge increase in the use of those fuels in the short term for transportation, construction, and production. There's no other way to make that happen, since most of our power is currently carbon-based.

If increased carbon fuel use to increase renewable power is forbidden, then the other non-magical solution is a radical decrease in the world's energy needs, by a radical reduction in population. Some of the wimpier solutions to reduce population are demonizing GMO crops, which helps create mass starvation, but that's too slow. Now wars really help reduce the population, which might be the reason behind some of the "mistakes" in foreign policy we're seeing.

Nuclear war is the best population reducer; biological attacks are pretty effective too, but even the Spanish flu only killed off 18 million people (many more being saved by the "wonder drug," aspirin), so a better pandemic is needed if that's one of the chosen routes. Chemical warfare is limited in the extent of its effects, so that isn't a practical solution.

Of course, if the use of carbon based fuels could be greatly reduced, without any real replacement, then the number of deaths by hypothermia would soar. Heat stroke would also take its toll, but in much smaller numbers (after all, only 15,000 French died a few Summers ago during their heat wave). It is interesting that many climate change fanatics are also obsessed with radical population reduction.

Be prepared for some interesting "discussion" once you point out some of these facts. You too could wind up on the President's "Enemies of the State" list.

Jews. See the hated Jew. KILL the Jew. Don't be caught saying anything good about Jews.

Oops, for a moment there I slipped back 80 years in time. Must have been something I ate.

Holy crap. This seems like something out of McCarthy's Red Scare or the Salem Witch Trials. Let's hang them before we even try to discover the truth.

Burn the witch or stone and rope to bind her soul
Sink or swim and watch the truth drown below

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=496sY4mE...

McCarthyism returns!
"Land of the 'Free-to-toe the Party line' "
'1984' Big Brother re-run

Just a note: The Democrats have NEVER been my party. AND Barack Obama will NEVER be my President! That is creepy yes but why would anyone believe that to Obama FACTS actually matters? He governs the world he wishes to live in and NOT in the world he actually lives in!

Isn't the SAME think Hitler did when he started the Hitler Youth? Find those who do not agree with you and make them afraid.

I have been saying something since 2012. We will probably NOT see a 2016 election.

We will most likely see a Coronation of King and Queen Obama.

As said, this is creepy, what next, the apple pie derisors? On another front though, here is an actual seemingly factual analysis that does tend to lend support to the climate change argument. The one thing a lot of discussions leave out is the effect of deforestation on the issue, maybe it is not just the amounts being added, but the scrubbers are being removed?

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vao...

Bizarro-world

Well, the Denier List could be turned into a badge of honor. Maybe someone needs to start a Fool's List.

That is really, really some messed up scary stuff.

Did you click on the link and see the list?

I was a climate change denier tonight in my class. It came up when I had to teach about free radical chemistry.

Yes.

That was creepy. This is getting nasty... like evil dictator kind of nasty.