As long as the res ficta of a two party system of a republic is kept alive in the face of res facta and as long as a sufficient number can put gas in the pickup and attend the tailgate parties at the stadia the couch potato mentality will continue to drive the country out of existence. Recall in the book the state of things required for the Galtist counter revolution to work., Even now when it's not a don't worry about it that's five generations from now attitude but in your face retirees and those facing retirement with devalued retirement dollars one has a better chance of counting on a job at WalMart.
Maybe US citizens arent as ignorant as one might have believed after the election of Obama. Maybe Obama and his lies and hidden socialist agenda is turning people away from socialism after all. One has to look only to Venezuela to see where it leads- yet the people in Venezuela appear to be so ignorant that they cant even see it when it gets that bad. I think that young people are rebelling against the crony capitalist bent of the politicians and are really looking for a change from that. Regular people dont have a chance when lobbyists and politicians can favor their friends using government power.
Don't forget that CNBC is where the Tea Party movement actually started. They have radically changed their lineup to a much more capitalistic lineup. They have several shows now that a Gulcher might like, including Shark Tank and The Profit.
here is the first time I heard about organizing something. we listened to this and then I read a letter to the editor in my town and then more and more people wrote letters to the editor about Stimulus and then people said they were gathering at a park at noon on April 15. over 700 people showed up. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcvSjKCU...
Amazingly, my 6- and 4-y/o like Shark Tank. We saw it by chance in a hotel room.
I gave another vote for in favor of a "dose of Rand". There's nothing in objectivism I know of that says we must be pessimists. We can see the 74% and say, "yes, the time is ripe!" rather than working out some explanation about how crappy things are.
Shark Tank is about the only commercial show I watch. Anyone wanting to get into business should watch it for educational reasons. Mark Cuban is there because he is trying to get people interested in starting businesses. He doesnt need the $$ at all.
Agree but I've always wondered why Ken Lay late of late Enron would steal the savings of 28,000 employees. He didn't need the money buy a long shot so all I've come up with is a power trip.
If they consider stealing from me, that means I must have the very thing they need, or at least the money to buy it. By the same token, there are always things that a normal person could offer to do for me, so it would be a trade for food or money.
Wow! The results of the poll actually surprised me! So why don't they translate into real world results??? Thanks for the great find, K! It was an interesting read, and I'm pleasantly surprised by the source.
Sorry, I don't think they want to hear what she said. To many our looters who are in power and what some thing to claim is on their side. Clearly they want words to twisted to fit their believes. Not what she said.
It's up to seventy-four percent now. But some people here raise an interesting point. People are less willing than they once were, to peruse articles with content with which they disagree.
I didn't see the poll - maybe too late in the day, but I did get to an even smarmier article from, of course, The Wire. I knew, when I [voluntarily] signed the pledge against the initiation of violence, that there would be these times, when I just wanted to walk up to someone and slap him. just once, I promise? OK, you're right. a pledge made and then abandoned when it's hard to keep is no pledge. But still.........
This article reads like an assignment the author didn't want to write, on a person he knew nothing about but didn't like anyway. He points out that neither "progressive economist" Paul Krugman nor Peter Wehner, an aide to Reagan and Bush the Elder, were thrilled by her. That and a page of the Congressional Record, and you can go to the bathroom and emerge squeaky clean! Yes, I like to see Rand's name in print, even that of her detractors. his one reads just so.....icky. and yet he is, I supposed, a "respected" columnist. You notice no mention of any movies, of course. He wants you to think the only way you can learn what she said is to read Atlas, whose sales stats he also maligned. oh, grrrrr.
Critics of Ayn Rand either never went to the article (most likely), or never made it as far as the poll.
I would give anything for that 73% to be true cross section....
I think that young people are rebelling against the crony capitalist bent of the politicians and are really looking for a change from that. Regular people dont have a chance when lobbyists and politicians can favor their friends using government power.
I gave another vote for in favor of a "dose of Rand". There's nothing in objectivism I know of that says we must be pessimists. We can see the 74% and say, "yes, the time is ripe!" rather than working out some explanation about how crappy things are.
Thanks for the great find, K! It was an interesting read, and I'm pleasantly surprised by the source.
Not what she said.
I knew, when I [voluntarily] signed the pledge against the initiation of violence, that there would be these times, when I just wanted to walk up to someone and slap him. just once, I promise? OK, you're right. a pledge made and then abandoned when it's hard to keep is no pledge. But still.........
Yes, I like to see Rand's name in print, even that of her detractors. his one reads just so.....icky.
and yet he is, I supposed, a "respected" columnist. You notice no mention of any movies, of course. He wants you to think the only way you can learn what she said is to read Atlas, whose sales stats he also maligned.
oh, grrrrr.
N I C E.
I'm fairly sure we voted the same way.
Voted a couple of minutes ago.