All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 3.
  • Posted by 10 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Hopefully this information will get to the Senate committee in charge of approving the AG appointment. My question is does this information make republicans look bad in any way. If so, this may not see the light of day.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 2 months ago
    Seems like business as usual - big gov't protecting big banking. Move along, nothing to see here.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 10 years, 2 months ago
    Wow! This should be a monster story that would make Watergate look like child's play and be comparable to Enron in terms of how big a deal it is. Don't pay attention to that man behind the curtain.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It's a developing story from what I hear. We will have to see if it has legs. Like most Obama supporters it will probably find a way to be swept under the rug.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 10 years, 2 months ago
    So the banks like drug money accounts because it shores up their 'reserves' which allows them to expand lending of credit created from nothing.
    Surprise! Another conflict of interest by the banksters who think their only responsibility is to convert the marks' (customers') assets into bankster assets. Vampire squid, indeed!

    Where else have the banksters used their influence to support the failed drug war for this nefarious purpose?
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo