All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 4.
  • Posted by TheRealBill 10 years, 3 months ago
    I think it is safe to say Disneyland is the reason we're dealing with so much measles scare mongering in the media these days. If it hadn't been for Disneyland we wouldn't have been hearing about unrelated and minor incidents such as the 5 kids in Chicago getting it.

    Disneyland as the "ground zero" has a much better headline draw than LAX.

    Looking at the stats we get around 50-75 cases per year in the U.S. This is much better than the half-mill we were getting in the early 50's. There were two factors in this regard: 1) The natural vaccination of the country, and 2) later vaccine developments.



    We've been largely enjoying the benefits of both, though the effects of the first are waning. Surveys indicates that during the 50's at least 95% of the country had had measles by age 15.

    In any case, in a population with exposure of vaccination levels as we have there are bound to be outbreaks. These outbreaks are very much like terrorism - occasional but not overall significant on their own.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ kddr22 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    There is much data emerging about how are normal bacteria play an important role in immunity esp gut bacteria ...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ kddr22 10 years, 3 months ago
    most of the deaths were from egg allergy to that component of the vaccine. The vaccine is safe, has prevented millions from being infected from a serious disease that can cause death to infertility...based on science not opinion
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by pault 10 years, 3 months ago
    And without vaccine there would be tens of thousands of deaths. Try logic
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes. I researched it and found all the science indicates vaccinating is safer. The gov't should have no say in it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    And most bacteria are not pathogenic. Killing all bacteria kills those competing for space with pathogenic bacteria..
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 3 months ago
    I'm not sure that "Natural News" is an entirely unbiased source. Nor do I trust the CDC. So, as far as I'm concerned, the jury is still out.

    108 deaths in 10 yrs from millions inoculated demonstrates a very low risk level. And protecting children from Measels, Mumps, and Rubella illnesses is certainly worth the incredibly low risk. I think that you have a higher risk of getting killed in a car than dying from a MMR vaccine injection.

    That said, it should still be up to the parents to make those decisions, not a government official.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Which is a reason not to use anti-bacterial soap, particularly for children. They need to be exposed to minor non-lethal germs so as to build up immunities and not get sick so easily later in life.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by straightlinelogic 10 years, 3 months ago
    Thank you for posting this. I don't know why you haven't got any comments. I hadn't really followed the latest story very much, and was kind of thinking that perhaps this was a new type of measles, more severe, perhaps deadlier, than the measles I had for a week as a kid. I do not understand the urgency to vaccinate people against non-lethal diseases. I never get flu shots. Why? I'm in great shape and its not going to kill me, probably just a few days of throwing up and diarrhea, and it will build up my immunities. There are some benefits to getting sick once in a while.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo