The Hunger Games : Catching Fire

Posted by Itheliving 11 years, 11 months ago to Movies
34 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

The Hunger Games : Catching Fire / Rated PG-13 for violence, garish costuming and some kissing.

After the blockbuster Harry Potter films began to run out of stories they decided to split the last book in order to keep the cash cow alive and flowing. The Hunger Games Catching Fire is based on part two of a trilogy of stories. Part one made enough money to support the entire world for 6 months and still show a profit. Part two is already on course for a gazillion dollars. The next film would be based on the last book but the studio said NO NO NO, and copied what Harry Potter did. One long film now in production to be released in two parts in 2014 and 2015 . The titles will be THG Mockingjay Part 1 and Part 2 based on the book Part 3. All of the original cast will show up watching bigger paydays and instead of banking the money they buy a bank to hold their money. Check the opening weekend box office results and you’ll see that I am correct.

Jennifer Lawrence returns as the heroine and gets to shoot lots of arrows. Donald Sutherland is again the bad guy running the government. Philip Seymour Hoffman is added as an assistant bad guy. Stanley Tucci returns as the emcee of the show. Woody Harrelson is still the coach of the combatants from District 12. Liam Hemsworth, brother of Chris Hemsworth (Thor) shows staying power. Jack Quaid, son of Meg Ryan and Dennis Quaid and nephew of Randy Quaid is added as a new combatant. JQ should make enough money from this film to bail out Uncle Randy from all his problems.

The story follows the events of part one and is preceding the events of part three and part four which is really an extension of part three. Things are still horrible in the 12 Districts where all the miserable live. The big city where the elite and the government reside is like Elysium. See prior review on Elysium for details. Through a trick of the government and a rule change, former winners of the gladiator like contest have to return and fight it out again. This would be like telling the winner of the Super Bowl they would have to replay the entire season before they get the trophy.

The first hour and 15 minutes is a lot of anguish, soap opera and misery. The second hour is a lot better. That’s when the games begin. This time everyone is much more experienced. No really young children. Since the games are in their 75th edition even a combatant from the home for the gray and elderly is in the fight. She has to be carried around a lot. Walkers not allowed in the combat arena. She calls all her competitors Bingo. To tone down the violence we don’t see as much of the violent death as the first time around. We just hear the explosions of the death cannon and see the deceased each night in pictures in the sky. Most of the threats to the combatants come from the strange and never ending sequence of natural events which keep them running. Who knew monkeys and fog could be this dangerous?

The film ends with an obvious set up for the upcoming sequels based on a single sequel. THG leading stars and production companies are making an offer on Fort Knox to hold their money.

Rated 3.0 out of 4.0 parts out of 3.0 books. As Harry Potter would say to the cast and crew… bibbidi-bobbidi-boo… more money coming in for you.



All Comments

  • Posted by LetsShrug 11 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It was a metaphor! (Changing things in your mind constantly..rethinking, rewriting...) Much like owning and running your own business...it never turns off.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 11 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I watched Good Morning Vietnam like 25 years ago... sorry, I didn't remember the "gals" bit. lol Hell, I forgot Forest Whittaker was in it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 11 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    LOL Now I've got like a million questions. Do you have access to studios or are you doing this on the street? How long have you been working on this? You must never sleep....and your mind probably operates on a reel, cutting and splicing scenes 24x7.
    Reply | Permalink  
    • RogerMalcolm replied 11 years, 11 months ago
  • Posted by RogerMalcolm 11 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I watched Good Morning Vietnam. Forest Whittaker calls the French Vietnamese women "gals". It's a joke in the movie and found it's way into my writing making me think it was funny.

    Life is hectic and feeling shorter all the time.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 11 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Oh! Erin is your gal? From To Kill a Mockingbird? Cool. She knew her stuff...I was feeling like I really need to reread that book...it's been a while..love it though.
    You watched Good Morning Vietnam today? Or was that statement stuck in the middle of that sentence awkwardly because it was something E said? (I don't think I got to watch the end of the review...I was baby sitting and it was getting interrupted a lot...I've been meaning to get back to it. Life is hectic...and short!)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by RogerMalcolm 11 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    E is Erin the gal(I watched Good Morning Vietnam today) that filled in for Dave last week on 3 Men and a Movie.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by RogerMalcolm 11 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I'm closer than I was to getting it done but I wouldn't say anywhere near being finished. I'm having to do a third rewrite in the middle of filming. I figured I had 25% filmed with 10% edited then I had to stop. Now some of that 25% is scrapped and the 10% edited is still good. Now I have to drop characters, add/drop scenes and rewrite my ending.

    As for reviewing it. I only hope I finish it so we can do whatever anyone wants.

    As for what it is about, a character based zombie film centered around a meet cute.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 11 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Who's "E"?
    She's not a villian in this movie. She's a bad ass though. Gotta love that.
    (Please tell me you're familiar with this story... I think it needs to be your next movie review...speaking of rational self interest You could dissect the hell out of that...everyone would want to say Katniss was being selfless, willing to give up her life for her family, but can you fight to the death and be selfless, or does that make you selfish for wanting to save your own life (and that of your family), (selfish=rational self interest). Hmmmm
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 11 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "I find myself very reliable and others not so much."
    I've said that sentence more than a few times in my life.
    Hmmm, you mentioned you were working on a film...I was thinking you were writer director. Anywhere near being finished? Will you have a movie review once it's done? Or do WE get to do that one? That would be fun us....and nerve racking for you. What's it about?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by RogerMalcolm 11 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Also, as I always have to try to convince E, Jena Malone is my favorite actress because of her acting ability. She is an actress. Not eye-candy garbage lacking ability and brains. So I would never run for nudity. Though I might for a career defining role but I doubt she'll get that in this. I don't know though, I think she played a villain.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by RogerMalcolm 11 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I believe we're all actors/artists but to answer your question, I gave myself the largest part in my film. I have 25% of the dialogue. I told my cast I chose to do it so no one could complain about having too much to do since no one would have as much as me. The next is 14% then 9%. Something like that. The more honest reason was because I knew I could count on myself to give my best at all times. I find myself very reliable and others not so much. After having half the cast quit after it becoming too much work and too demanding, I am still thinking I knew what I was getting myself into. Though since I don't have much experience acting, I tend to not include it in my bios online. I would rather mention the much more demanding skills as a writer, director and editor. Though after acting while directing the scene, I shouldn't discredit myself perhaps. Its challenging work. Absolute madness with amateurs.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 11 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You and actor Roger?
    Okay Jena Malone was very convincing. She got naked in her first scene, in an elevator. (They didn't show anything so don't go run to the theater.) Although I think the movie adaptation was far beyond what I imagined they could pull off. I remember, while reading it, that it would be difficult to get it on screen as complicated as things were in the story, a lot going on and crazy special effects, but they did very well. And I hope it plants a seed in the younger generation about government intrusions and how important freedom is to retain. I only wished I had the smarts to have rewatched part 1 before I watched part 2.
    I haven't seen Lawrence in anything else so I don't have much of an opinion...she's pulling off Katniss I think.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by RogerMalcolm 11 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Jennifer Lawrence just didn't impress me in Silver Linings Playbook and Bradley Cooper showed that he's more of a pretty face than an actor. Cooper had a role I'd like to attempt just to prove I could pull from more than he ever could. It's a phony Hollywood film, what should I expect!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 11 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Haven't seen that. Do tell though...what don't you like about her? (I only know her from The Hunger Games). (Pride and Prejudice, Kira Knightly version, is my favorite.)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by RogerMalcolm 11 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Indeed, she is in Pride and Prejudice. I would love to hear what you have to say about her performance. I am not a fan of the lead actress though. Silver Linings Playbook didn't help either.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 11 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Ah....did she play the goofy sister in Pride and Prejudice? I guess I could google that answer huh? I'll pay close attention to her today while watching the movie and give you my unwanted opinion of her performance. lol
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by RogerMalcolm 11 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "any movie where the government is the bad guy and the citizens stand up for themselves is good by me."

    I must agree. I did not read the books. After Harry Potter came Twilight and then Hunger Games into our family discussions. After Twilight I wasn't about to take a family members recommendation on anything ever again, haha. It's not funny though cause those books are shit. I actually think the first film is more tolerable than the book and it's not worth my time.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo