Dem uses Capitol threat in push for ammo limits

Posted by Eudaimonia 10 years, 4 months ago to Politics
7 comments | Share | Flag

Ok, five points here for my ex-Senator Chris Murphy (Demagogue, CT)

* The first on the nature of the threat
1) The "Capitol Threat" you refer to had *nothing* to do with Congress.
It was a divorce dispute.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-r...

* The second and third on your assertion that "those who wanted high-capacity magazines were more interested in 'arming against the government.'”
2) Everybody speaks about the Second Amendment, of which the "arm against the government" intention has been upheld by SCOTUS on a number of occasions, but let's talk about the Declaration.
You do realize that, according to the Declaration, it's the *duty* of The People to so arm themselves?

3) If your concern is over the number of people so arming themselves, perhaps you Demagogues should step back and ask yourselves what you in DC have done to scare the living shit out of them enough to prompt the people to do so.

* The fourth on Senator Murphy's State of Connecticut.
4) Taking Connecticut's onerous and unconstitutional gun laws federal *will not* stop taxpayers from fleeing for their lives from your economic sinkhole of a socialist utopia because there's no place else to go.

* And the last, again on Senator Murphy's assertion
5) In the words of the late hero of our Republic Andrew Breitbart, "So?"


All Comments

  • Posted by edweaver 10 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It would take more than 30 rounds to take care of all the problems in that building. Lol
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 10 years, 4 months ago
    “Think of the damage that someone could do in the U.S. Capitol with 30 rounds,”

    Damage? Think of the headlines in favor of gun control. I'm surprised the liberals haven't arranged for a fall guy to come in and shoot conservatives.

    No, they know they can control the conservatives and convert them to moderates in no time.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 10 years, 4 months ago
    I'd say Canada can have CT but I think even Canada would reject some of the liberty losses in that state
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo