No civics test? No diploma.

Posted by $ blarman 11 years, 1 month ago to Culture
33 comments | Share | Flag

This really appeals to me. Let's see how many of our high schoolers - and by virtue of instruction their teachers - know the Constitution.

I think we ought to impose something like this on anyone who wants to hold office or work for the Federal Government.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by freedomforall 11 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    Good point. The number of amendments was a meaningless question. Teaching about the debate related to passage of an amendment rarely happens. The fact that some amendments were passed without southern states having any vote is rarely considered(or the 'vote' was done by military representatives under military rule without regard to actual residents.) There was a great deal of controversy about the ratification of the 16th amendment but that is never considered.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Susanne 11 years, 1 month ago
    Oh no, I didn't know who the current governor of Arizona was...

    The critics say it's a bad thing because it requires "rote memorization" - I think it would be a damned good thing if kids had to memorize at least 100 things about our government... maybe when the government decided to step on liberties, something would click in their minds and they'd not follow the wolves like sheep.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 11 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    Or dumbs it down to irrelevancies - the test associated with the article asks for the number of amendments. WHO CARES? What about the essence of the ninth, tenth, sixteenth, and seventeenth amendments?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 11 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    The problem is that government only approves teaching the 'civics' that suits governments' purposes: to cover up that government doesn't work and those in government pervert it for their own goals. Instead of trusting government ( and hiding the unintended consequences of centralized government power), liberals would be better served to believe Rand when she observes human nature's tendency toward self interest.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by paturpin 11 years, 1 month ago
    when I was in school at least they attempted to teach us about government, how it works,how and why we have the form of government we do, it seems like a no
    brainer that this would be included in our education today, but then there isn't much brain power being used in the education system now
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 11 years, 1 month ago
    Agree with edweaver. The 'civics' that is taught bears little resemblance to the political corporatocracy system that makes debt serfs of most people and gives a voice to very few.
    With "all due respect", this test is lip service only.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by edweaver 11 years, 1 month ago
    While this sounds like a good idea on the surface, the questions that were asked are easy to study. IMHO they hold little value in what this country is about. If the questions make them read the Constitution and answer questions specifically about it they would have more value and may help move us in the right direction.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 11 years, 1 month ago
    I seem to remember that Illinois had this requirement in the past.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo