Why it's wrong to beat your opponent 161-2
It's not.
Unless you're part of the PC crowd.
If you can't coach a basketball team of the same age of youngsters any better than this, you should resign. It's a sporting competition: my best against your best. If your best is only two points and mine is 100+, what that says is that you've got some improving to do. But whining about what I did right is no way to improve your game.
Unless you're part of the PC crowd.
If you can't coach a basketball team of the same age of youngsters any better than this, you should resign. It's a sporting competition: my best against your best. If your best is only two points and mine is 100+, what that says is that you've got some improving to do. But whining about what I did right is no way to improve your game.
Where's the "mercy rule" in business competition?
You're getting too much market share, so what should you do? Have the government reset your selling prices higher to 'level the playing field for your competition'? Oh, wait... they already do that...
At some point, the "winning coach" should have realized the PR hazard he was chipping into and changed the entire tone of the game. They were going to win. Doubt was gone.
He could have had his team literally coach and help the inept team to develop their skills. That might have turned it into a source for better PR and maybe a sappy Hollywood flick, too, but that apparently doesn't cross the mind of coaches or players.
Ah, well, the media will figure some way to reward the incompetents for having 'stuck it out to the bitter end,' rather than acknowledging their limitations compared to the other team.
Everyone (should/must) go home with a trophy, right?
Real real-world teaching moment for everyone.
Feh!
Instead of best effort against best effort (no matter how mismatched) the winning team for all intents and purposes hopped on one foot for the last part of the game. That’s rude and a bit insulting to the opposing team.
I think a two-game suspension is a bit harsh, but hopefully he’s learned his lesson and won’t try to hold his team back next time.
Yes, it has nothing to do with war.
Why do you think that competition must be "fair" or "even?" Where in life (at least those areas that are still free) are things "fair?"
As I tell my children, "Life's not fair, get over it, and excel where you are best."
In some comments above I saw people draw analogies between sport and warfare. I think that such reasoning is mistaken and out of place. Just my opinion.
That losing basketball team needs a better coach. surely one of us is qualified? It's an obvious job opening, whether the team's sponsoring organization knows it or not.
This is an incredible article. It highlights a lot of what is wrong with our culture.
If you are in a competition where the stated purpose is sportsmanship and elegant behavior, then winning is not important and behaving well is. If you are in a competition where 'winning' is the stated goal, then doing so whilst abiding by the rules of the game is nothing but commendable.
Jan
I have to agree with Blarman. 161-2? Can an NBA team even beat a college team that badly, how about a real HS team? When I was in HS, in soccer we were 22-0. Our biggest blowout was like 13-0, but 4 or 5 points were scored by our second string. In my 30's our pickup team, played a team of semi / retired pros that were running a coaching clinic. We got beat, but I scored the first point. 161-2...c'mon!
Without a mercy, rule, I'd just expect the coach to put his second string in the second half. If he did that, then he is completely exonerated. If he didn't, he should be admonished for not letting his second team get some playing time.
Maybe he just wanted some of his players to break some records for the benefit of getting on a college team, but that other coach must be a clown.
But the mismatch isn't the coach's fault. Once the leagues are set, then every team is supposed to do the best it can for itself, which typically includes giving the non-starters experience.
One of the worst lines in the article was:
"Anderson said he is excited to get back to work, and will not to make the same mistake again. 'It wasn’t a good feeling,' he told the Orange County Register. 'It’s not something I’m proud of. It’s not something I would put on a mantel'.”
If there wasn't much to be proud of in such a mismatch, that was still no way to describe it. What was his "mistake"? It sounds like he's pandering to weakness.
Load more comments...