These were given out by my daughter's French teacher at the high school today. I think this was so cool! Free speech is alive and well in my town. Astonishing considering I live in CT!
All Comments
Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
I'd rather not have the screen updates bogged down to a crawl with massive bandwidth wasting pictures. And that's just from productive posts. Imagine how bad troll posts would be. Yes, it would be nice to display a chart or wisely compressed photo, but links usually work well enough. There are places that don't have free unlimited bandwidth and most American web designers haven't a clue about frugal bandwidth use. Fortunately the Gulch designers understand. I could rant for some time about how the web UI "experience" has degraded since mouse over menus became ubiquitous interruptions to anyone just trying to read an article in peace. Anyway I vote no thanks to in-comment bandwidth wasting illustrations. Anything worth displaying is worth compressing, uploading, and linking. That give the freedom of choice to the reader.
Your point has merit, that said, I will defend their right to say or publish whatever they want, regardless of the levels of taste evoked. I'm not sure if there is any person, religion or irony that they have not poked. I simply cannot condone any attack on anyone's right of free speech or their right to voice their own opinions or to read what ever they wish to read. And while I might be prone to restrict it on a grade school reading list, in Middle or High School it is fodder for an excellent Social Studies discussion.
I did decide to backtrack erase half a sentence I started. The reason I only posted the link without comment was that I was chomping on the bit to ask--never mind what I was going to ask. That would be telling after having to decided not to write, well, post a word.
When they can't effectively argue your points their go to move is smear you personally.
Dino just snickered at what he wrote.
Darlene Love is playing at Ike this coming Saturday. One of the great, but unknown, singers (due to Phil Specter, scumbag).
Yes, it would be nice to display a chart or wisely compressed photo, but links usually work well enough. There are places that don't have free unlimited bandwidth and most American web designers haven't a clue about frugal bandwidth use. Fortunately the Gulch designers understand. I could rant for some time about how the web UI "experience" has degraded since mouse over menus became ubiquitous interruptions to anyone just trying to read an article in peace.
Anyway I vote no thanks to in-comment bandwidth wasting illustrations. Anything worth displaying is worth compressing, uploading, and linking. That give the freedom of choice to the reader.
I simply cannot condone any attack on anyone's right of free speech or their right to voice their own opinions or to read what ever they wish to read.
And while I might be prone to restrict it on a grade school reading list, in Middle or High School it is fodder for an excellent Social Studies discussion.
It's the Information Age.
There! You made me talk. Well, sorta.
The reason I only posted the link without comment was that I was chomping on the bit to ask--never mind what I was going to ask.
That would be telling after having to decided not to write, well, post a word.
:-)
In all my 67 years, I have asked more than one dumb question.
Load more comments...