- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
How is any of that comparable to an 'O type society'?
I repeat:
Hitler prevailed for more than 6 million Jews and several million Gypsies, Homosexuals, handicapped, etc. That was a cruel reality for them.
You seem to think that since they didn't last "forever" that they somehow don't seem to count. These "Attilas" are very real.
How do you account for the "enlightened" US populace which is seemingly placing itself back under a tyrant, enslaving itself to a government? This has nothing to do with religion, in fact, it is partially due to a lack of religion, in my estimation. BO is not using a religious argument to push altruism, quite the contrary, he's using selfishness and class envy, very much anti-Christian themes (as well as most other major religions).
If it is merely "enlightenment" that is needed to achieve this O type society, what accounts for the US today? It is certainly not religion that is causing what is occurring today.
You seem to think that since they didn't last "forever" that they somehow don't seem to count. These "Attilas" are very real.
How do you account for the "enlightened" US populace which is seemingly placing itself back under a tyrant, enslaving itself to a government? This has nothing to do with religion, in fact, it is partially due to a lack of religion, in my estimation. BO is not using a religious argument to push altruism, quite the contrary, he's using selfishness and class envy, very much anti-Christian themes (as well as most other major religions).
Remember that Objectivism was only published through AS starting in 1957 with scholarly writings following, yet Christianity had been there for 2000 years, without much success against WWI, Hitler, Mao, Lenin, Stalin, Idi Amin, Pol Pot to name just a few. And now we're dealing once again with another religiously driven murderous ideology, Islam.
His posts are like listening to a broken record with deep scratches which turn what might have been a tune with potential into an interrupted and disconnected annoyance. He is unwilling, or unable, to stay on point, frequently shifting focus to some tangential red herring, and often taking cheap shots at people trying to learn more about Objectivism or Ayn Rand.
Maybe he thinks he is some avenging 'angel' for his beliefs, or something else; I don't know. But I don't see someone interested in the ideas of Objectivism or the novels of Ayn Rand. He can pay a la carte lip service to the movies all he wants, but his posts indicate that he isn't interested in the ideas that gave rise to them.
His favorite conundrums show a lack of understanding of the fundamentals that explain the nature and primacy of existence. So, he shouldn't be surprised, if he stays, to be ignored, or have his flawed chains of thought dismantled.
As you said...it speaks volumes...are there contradictions...?
You are likely to state "rational selfishness." That "theory" says that no person should exert their will over another, because it would then cause their own liberty to be at risk. I say that is idiocy and has been disproven by thousands of years of history.
Load more comments...