I liked the suggestion of releasing the movie to the public AND asking for donations... and my 'like' ground to a stop with Romney's suggestion of what to do with the revenue.

That's where he is VERY wrong. Just proves that he thinks he knows where income and revenue should go... to wherever he suggests.

Bad for America... nearly as bad as the guy in the WH today.

she's the "you didn't build that" queen. -- j

That is frightening too!

or that $300k/year harvard prof from Mass,
Senator Liz Warren (sic). -- j

remember Romneycare? 'nuf said. -- j

Exactly. It seems the movie is the only thing from Sony that isn't getting out.

A leopard does not change its spots, and I doubt Mitt will change his underwear. If this crapitalist wins anything, I need to change mine.

if these two are the candidates it is irrelevant who wins. the country is is free fall to socialism and all they will do is foster it further. we now know that the pres functions autonomous of the congress and they the congress rubber stamp what ever the pres does.

In any Democommie case, another goofy looking bobble-head face to turn the TV channel from. Thank heaven for my quick draw remote.

Got that memo but heard in may even be worse than Hillary, if that is possible. What's her name from the left coast, Dianne Feinstein.Yikes!

Your not the only one. I am with you on this! :)

Better to have the plan in much better organization before we make it a crowd sourced prospect. So far we are still looking for a decent site.

I agree that the whole story sounds fishy.

I didn't used to be, but I am now.

I think Sony is afraid of more releases of the stolen emails and other data. That threat was expressly raised in today's extortion note from the GOP.

I would donate $5 to see it, but the money should go to the makers of the film, not to some charity thing. To hell with N Korea.

If that is the case, then the only reason for not releasing the film for online distribution is gone.

Jan

Crowd-sourcing? Post a project online. We're going to need a LOT of cash...

YES YES and YES.

I think I heard that insurance is not covering this fiasco.

if sony really wanted to fight this nk business they would show the movie the way it was intended as a money making deal. raising money for ebola will only put money in the hands of those who want to see ebola continue to spread, then someone will want to give them more like 0. with all of the hoopla that has taken place sony will do very well if they just do what they intended to do and the hell with the nk"s if they did do what they supposedly have done.

Well then get ready. I don't know if you got the memo but it will be Hillary vs. Jeb. Hillary will win, too.

I'm surprised the whole thing hasn't been posted to the Internet already. "The Internet sees censorship as damage and routes around it."

I am with you on that, even though I know that voting 3rd party is allowing another progressive into the office. I truly believe that it is my generation and the generation before me that has allowed our country to go down hill. I do not want to pass these problems on and voting for a rhino is passing the buck to the next generation. If the only path to freedom requires starting over, I would rather start over now than pass our problems to someone else.

Am I the only one here who sees this as wrong on multiple levels? Sony shouldn't give their film rights up, and Romney shouldn't be asking for the sanction of the victim. Moreover, the altruism that Romney asks Sony to participate in is for Ebola treatment, yet another case of altruism that will cost all of us in America more when yet another contaminated doctor or nurse returns home.