- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/no...
He makes some pretty good arguments. I'd be interested in the other side if there is a similar op-ed.
(That would probably violate some rational work rules.)
If I was suspicious, I would suspect that the unpaid leave was done for another reason having nothing to do with pregnancy.
The lack of COBRA mentioned in the article doesn't sound right. It sounds like both parties are following "rules" instead of using good business sense.