Do you think he waffled? I don’t. After hearing the Judge’s explanation of what could happen down the road, I now feel that Roberts may have done the right thing for the right reasons. It’s like he was shouting it out: “It’s lawful because it is a TAX” Remember, the government denied and didn’t want to refer to the mandate as a tax until they had to argue it before the Supreme Court.
Roberts, cold, slap in the face may have actually been an attempt to wake up us to the reality of how badly we had been hood-winked. We are paying attention now.
Next summer’s case is about the subsidies, not about the constitutionality of the entire law. Or is there another case I don’t know about?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJ3xTjvj...
:)

Yeah....we should've kept notes... :(

You mind expanding on this please? (about Beck and Hannity...why Beck belongs and Hannity doesn't...) (btw, at one point we were told that the blaze was checking out the gulch...)

my point is anyone can join. what tipped me off was around the election certain things we were discussing (I was new to the site) were showing up that afternoon on their shows. specific things we were discussing not just the normal talking point kind of things

What about Glenn Beck? I like him and happen to think he belongs in our community.

Hannity, I'm not as sure of.

Roberts waffled because Obama threatened to pack the Supreme Court if it were overturned.

But once the Republican Congress is seated in January, he won't be able to do that. So next summer's case will give them another chance to overturn it, if five Justices really want to (and I expect they will).

I think there is more of that going on the Gulch than we may know....I'm pretty sure around the '12 election, sean Hannity was hanging out...it's just a rumor..
glenn beck,

yes, I was being sarcastic. You're almost as popular as the judge and we get to see you often in the gulch!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8FYXPEM...

Just lucky? I posted a lot of questions of my own and those of others. I also received a lot of answers and up-votes on the posted questions. It was almost like cheating... bulk saturation bonus. :)

Actually, this is the first one of these that I "participated" in and I found the format kind of unsatisfying. I'd rather it be on video or audio. Otherwise just give the guy a free membership to the Gulch and he can comment on anything he wants to whenever he wants to.

Not surprised.

Let's hope it gets reexamined. It appears there is good reason.

Next time, we could use more than an hour with him.

A couple days and he would have owned the week!
I also caught him on Cavuto’s show yesterday. "Crazy smart" was how the Judge was described. They were talking about Gruber. If there is proof that Gruber and others purposely wrote the language in the ACA bill ambiguously in order to confuse the question for the average voter whether or not it was a tax, the Supreme Court can be asked to reexamine it’s ruling.

He had several questions answered in that thread.

How 'd OA rake in 218?