Live discussion during Obama's declaration of amnesty for illegals

Posted by $ jbrenner 11 years, 3 months ago to Politics
124 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

As much as the Emperor-in-Chief has done to ruin this country, tonight is likely to take the cake. We will have a live reaction to an "executive action" that ought to be in AS: Now Non-Fiction.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 3.
  • Posted by $ 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I was referring specifically to the RINOs as the victims. I don't feel sorry for them, but he has asked for their sanction. Many have given it to him; some have not.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That was a low point for America, wasn't it? It was fitting that the Chinese head of state put him past the spouses of the other heads of state.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    +1 for Oblabla! I was mostly listening to Mark Levin's humor interspersed between Obama's lines. My daughter was LOLing.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by wiggys 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    IF you are suggestion that the members of the congress are the "victims" the same way that Ayn Rand used the term you are sadly mistaken. the members of the congress are in league with the president. therefore, they are not victims but birds of a feather or cohorts.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ohiocrossroads 11 years, 2 months ago
    Sorry, but I didn't watch Oblabla's speech last night. I figured why waste my time being lied to by a proven liar.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by wiggys 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    any chance ? the un-equivical answer is a resounding NO!!!!! If one does not learn to function as an adult as they age they never attain adulthood at any age.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by XenokRoy 11 years, 2 months ago
    Glenn Beck was talking this morning how "for the first time" we put King before law in the US.

    I would like to know where he has been on the issue of immigration for the last 50 years. The rule of law has not been followed and kings have granted amnesty before. Certifiably not the first time.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by RBrowntn 11 years, 2 months ago
    My wife is British. We spent over $9k and 3+ years dotting every "i" and crossing every "t" to get her here legally under a K-1 Visa. This included required medical exams and an exhaustive waiting process along with interviews here and in London. One misstep in that entire process can earn you a denial so we were very careful.

    O'amnesty is a direct middle finger to those of us who followed the law and subjected ourselves to the invasive process, background checks and government fees required to become a legal immigrant. This plan just gave fast lane access to living here illegally - legitimizing criminal behavior at the expense of citizens and legal immigrants alike.

    With the rise of UKIP back in Britain and fall of the labour party, the grass really is suddenly looking greener over there (and not just because of all the rain). Too bad the US is the only country on earth that taxes it's ex-pats no matter where they live.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Walt 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Maybe a sign of growing up is when he stops chewing gum when meeting heads of state in other countries. He is a narcissistic child and will never grow up.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DougJ 11 years, 2 months ago
    Gridlock is Good.
    The System was designed for gridlock.
    The system was not Broken.
    It's broken now.

    Long live the Sheeple!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Isn't that the truth? Sometimes when Obama speaks, he actually sounds reasonable, and then the next day he governs like the looting tyrant that he is.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by richrobinson 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I guess it all comes down to how the Executive Order is written. Obama has proven time and again he is willing to lie so what he actually said means nothing.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 11 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You are assuming that Obama's voters are paying attention. They are not. They will believe what they are told. Gruber is right. The only problem is that he actually gave away the game.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 11 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Watch closely. The next two Democratic nominees for president will be female and Hispanic. The only question is in which order. If we criticize them, then we will be sexist or racist, just like we have been labeled for criticizing the liar-in-chief.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 11 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Doublespeak... for those who doesn't understand and only hear what they WANT to hear... it's an old DICKtator trick....and it works, apparently... baaaaa-aaaa.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by richrobinson 11 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I think he will have a problem with doing this so soon after the mid terms. How can he claim congress is doing nothing when the new members won't be sworn in until January?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by richrobinson 11 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    True. The media is getting more irrelevant by the day however. They had little or no influence in the mid terms and if the average Latino gets less than they expect the Democrats will pay the price again in 2016.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 11 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    He is asking Congress to give him "the sanction of the victim". They aren't giving it to him, but they aren't punishing him for asking for it either.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo