![Galt's Gulch Online](/css/01-461295294528827044/mobile/assets/GGO_38x38.png)
![Galt's Gulch](/css/01-461295294528827044/mobile/assets/logo_38h.png)
- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
According to this site, the dollar is now worth $0.04 compared to 1913. http://www.comparegoldandsilverprices.co...
So if the spot price of gold is prox. $1193.00 http://www.kitco.com/charts/livegold.htm...
and I take my one dollar to the Mint, and one troy ounce contains 31.103 grams, will they really give me $1/$1193 X 31.103 = 0.02607 grams of gold? I guess if you cannot dazzle them with your brilliance, you will have to baffle them with your bullshit. Minus 1 for you Mike.
If all that printed money actually had hit the open market, you can bet you would have seen prices triple.
Inflation is a universally BAD idea. It devalues existing capital unnecessarily and the cascading effects only drive MORE inflation. It's also what leads to borrowing as an investment strategy, because you can use someone else's money more cheaply than your own!
So...inflation doesn't devalue the dollar?
That story does not explain why fiduciary contracts for future delivery of commodities were invented 2000 years _before_ "money". It does not explain why coins were not invented until 2000 years after silver and wheat were declared to be "money" (equally) in the time of Hammurabi but gold was not. It does not explain why when silver was the preferred and common medium across the Greek matrix c. 400 BCE, the soldiers in The Anabasis were happy to be paid in Kyzikenes, artificial electrum "staters" (about 1/2 a modern ounce). Those Kyzikenes were modern to them, but echoic of a payment common to mercenaries for 200 years - again, even after silver (primarily) and gold (secondarily) were struck.
It is true that we live in a "winner take all" society where first place is valued disproportionately to second, third, etc. And it is true that societies have all manner of such norms in food, clothing, language, etc., which come and go in fashion.
However, if it is _absolutely_ true as Kurt Weimar claims, then the US Dollar has been rationally chosen by most people in most places today to be at least one of the leading forms of money, if not the top if the heap.
Everyone talks about Weimar and the man with the wheelbarrow. Germany's money was worthless because Germany's gold went to England, France, et alia, to pay for all the civilian damage of World War One. When that happened, the people fell back on the silver and gold coins they had hoarded, and communities and others created their own ad hoc "Notgeld".
On the other hand, Turkey just went to a "New Lira" (2005) at a million to one against the old. Unlike the other losers in World War One and then again in WW Two - and unlike modern Israel - Turkey did not demonetize its old currency. Inflation was a predictable factor in their economy. The same was true of Italy, Portugal, Spain, and some other poor nations. In Africa, many nations formed small currency associations and/or pegged their common issues to the French franc. The old Hong Kong Dollar was pegged to the US Dollar. And, of course, after losing World War Two big time, Japan kept its yen. Once equal in gold to a US gold dollar, the yen fell to more than 300 to the dollar. But Japan kept their "worthless" yen, honored their commitments, and worked their way out. It is now about 118 in the industrial nations and just under 100 in the "developing economies" where it is somewhat more highly valued. So, yes, the USA could do the same thing - and without the catastrophic and radical remedies advocated in the video.
If government money were not any good, no one would take it. We would fall back to silver and gold or to other kinds of alternative currencies. This happened several times in the past. It goes on now with Time Dollars and Bay Bucks and maybe a dozen more that come and go. Nice as they are, they are emotional expressions, economic curios.
As a numismatist I know quite well what money buys and bought -- and what forms money may have in the future. I have published on all of those topics. And I live in the USA. I mean, really, Halling, why should you care about the dollar? You do not even live here. You are an ex-patriot.
(I also do most of the daily housework from cooking and dishes to vacuuming and ironing, and have for 38 years. My wife does a lot of things well. I fetched and carried for her when we built a deck on one house. We are building a home security system now. She likes to bake breads and desserts. She just does not find housework and homemaking satisfying. I do.)
His idea for getting out of the debt dollar sounds interesting.
Load more comments...