Add Comment


All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by  $  AJAshinoff 5 years, 6 months ago
    This is pretty rich. So no one bothered to check this guy out enough to even notice his skin color? I guess skin color is a major factor in most peoples minds when voting in that Texas country. A man, a white guy, elected to office under false pretense? lOl ! Damn, that's rich in this day and age, I though only muslim Kenyans plants could get away with that feat.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  Mimi 5 years, 6 months ago
    Why? Voters shouldn’t vote on someone for the color of their skin. He tricked the voters into seeing their ‘true colors’. I say when it comes to ruthfulness, he gets an A+. He didn’t lie about his positions, did he?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • -1
    Posted by Hiraghm 5 years, 6 months ago
    So it's safe to assume that Maphesdus either him/herself suffers from homosexuality, or cares for someone who does.

    "Anti-gay" is just PC speak for anyone who recognizes homosexuality as an affliction.

    To be accurate, "Anti-gay agenda" might be more accurate, since his specific objection was to pretending that homosexual relationships are marriage.

    Again, here the real story is his false claims of endorsement, not his objection to public acceptance of homosexuality. That was thrown in, in my opinion, for sensationalist purposes.

    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  


  • Comment hidden. Undo