- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 4.
Taking from a responsible one to give to an irresponsible one is wrong and in her relativistic world "unfair" by proportionality.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/posteveryt...
"We didn’t deserve to be poor, any more than we deserved to be rich."... wtf?
I've learned do not give them a choice unless they really have a choice. Choices can be powerful, giving them a the feeling of having some say in their world w/o being overwhelming. OTOH it's bad if I say "would you like to eat lunch now" if the only acceptable answer is yes.
What I hate are the ones who do give a choice they would never live with: "Get in your room or I'm going to kill you!." gives me shivers
Idiots.
My point is less about the actual value of the candy but the thought process of "need/want something --> do work to get it."
It doesn't make them feel okay about losing something, but feeling the loss of accidentally losing or breaking something is part of life.
and when I read that his woman actually entertained suggestions about how the kid who lost her candy could get more, I wanted to barf.
grrrrr.
Shame on her.