CG you are TROLL.

you support having a gun put to your head to buy a PRIVATE product. Everything you've practically said on this post is not the remotest capitalist. It's all straight up socialist philosophy. The opposite of Objectivism and Ayn Rand's ideas. Teh exact opposite. show me the liberty in ACA.

moral relativism at work.

Organized theft. Yep that is better....not.

"Obamacare IS FREELOADING medial care! "
We had a "system" of freeloading medical care before. ACA has its organized freeloading element. It's not perfect.

I meant what Hillary said about businesses not creating jobs is nuts.

I don't like blaming "evil epublicans/Democrats", but that's politics. I didn't say any one (except maybe I) support a party.

I admire Soros. From what I read in his book I would be friends with him. I never met him or even anyone who knows him though.

Lol! Cement shoes

did he send the candidate a dead fish?

Rahm is working on it. And the calibration issue..

Obamacare IS FREELOADING medial care! Don't you understand, that because it's a TAX that it is siphoned off of your earned income to support people who can't or won't support themselves?? Why is it that I HAVE to pay for it, and why is it that I am penalized for having great coverage already?!

All the progressives want to do is take, whether by stealth or overtly, what ISN'T THEIRS TO TAKE!!
The First Lady hag M is attempting to micromanage people's lives. She is so out of her depth, and so far removed from what liberty and free will are, which the country was founded on, and I cannot fathom how ANY RATIONAL PERSON would possibly wish her in any office where she has a say in any form of governance.

Truth. +1.

+1. Well said.

Christ Almighty! Hillary is not like krypotonite...she's "like" a progressive hypocrite who believes the end justifies her means. Saying things like "corporations don't make jobs" is just another way to demonize wealth and toot the horn of the 99 percenters/haters.

"Yeah, that's nuts."??? Noooo SHE'S nuts...and so are you.

Who said any of us support either "party"? Why did you even attempt to go there to make a point?

Your wife is a big fan of Hillary??? What is there to be a fan OF? Benghazi? Fake women inequality rants? Being good friends with George Soros? Being married to Bill? Blaming the "evil republicans: for the "rumors" about Monica? She's a telephone pole in a pant suit who tries to convince idiots that they're broke. WHAT'S TO LIKE??

"Who acts childish about liberty? Hilary was just speaking at án event."
Are you kidding? Hillary is like Kryptonite for Republicans' brains
¿án? ¿Teclado mexicano? :)

"She said businesses don 't create jobs."
Yeah, that's nuts.

"Are you personally happy with how ACA has been working out?"
Yes. It's supposed to spread the risk better than the "system" we had before. All those sick people are going to sign up, and premiums increase. It's far from perfect, but it's doing exactly what it was supposed to do-- keeping people from freeloading medical care and spreading the risk of getting sick even to people who already have been sick. It's working as expected, expect for those who expected those sick people to get treatment w/o anyone paying.

"How can you on one hand support liberty and on the other support a political party that embraces large government? "
Both mainstream parties support large intrusive gov't, so anyone supporting mainstream candidates at least indirectly supports a party that embraces large gov't. The other option is to to follow the corporate media and think about how $hitty life is and how any prosperity people create for one another is some kind of illusion.

It's obviously a huge problems that "factions" (parties) formed and even worse that both support a large intrusive gov't. Now anyone who supports a mainstream candidate "supports a party that embraces large gov't."

Your last phrase is odd. Who acts childish about liberty? Hilary was just speaking at án event. She said businesses don 't create jobs. Are you personally happy with how ACA has been working out? How can you on one hand support liberty and on the other support a political party that embraces large government?

I do think President Obama is good as mainstream politicians go. I think Hillary Clinton is fine, but I'm less positive toward her. She comes off in the media as a ruthless politician. I've never met either one. My wife's a big fan of Hillary. We met her daughter a few years ago, but I didn't interact with her much. My wife has an employee who got Hillary to sign her book. . I think there will be Hillary-related events in our future. The Clinton's seem like hard-core politicians to me. My wife, who lived in DC and worked at a law firm there many years ago, says you have to be a hardcore politician there. Maybe we'll have a chance to get involved and reduce gov't intrusiveness in some way. I think if Hillary runs, somehow we'll be involved in some very tiny way and will try to be a positive influence, even thought I'm less into politics and Hillary. If she turns out to be as ruthless as I imagine, I'll still try to have a positive influence for liberty and not act childish and self-righteous about it.

He is serious. He voted for odipshit twice.

If you're serious, I'm seriously worried about you now... If you're not serious, please us <ironic> or <cynical> font, ok?

I find it hard to imagine anyone who's not an O-Kool-Aid drinker ever wanting trash like her in office. Yes, she would fit in well in Illinois or California... because IL is corrupt from top to bottom and CA is stupid from top to bottom.

Would you like Hillary in the WH in a few years? I'm betting that the US electorate is stupid enough to make THAT happen, too!

[so, ask me how I REALLY feel about her?]
:)

I have only read a few things about her, but she gives off the appearance of being a good and intelligent person. I would be biased toward her b/c I liked Obama, as mainstream candidates go. I wonder if this will become a trend, people running for president after their spouse as served.

Another community organizer??