17

Why I love Galt's Gulch Online: An Example

Posted by Eudaimonia 10 years, 8 months ago to Philosophy
35 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

Yesterday, I started a thread on a point which I was mulling over in regard to today's university education.
http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/posts/17...

For the first time in a long time, I found that an issue which I proposed met a majority of disagreement.

And not just disagreement, but strong disagreement.

And do you know what happened?
Intellectually honest, vigorous debate.

So to those of you who participated, *especially* those of you who disagreed:
thank you for placing me in a position to further think out my arguments and work to make them clearer and stronger.

That's what debate is supposed to be about.

We might not agree, but, hey, we're not robots.



All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by straightlinelogic 10 years, 8 months ago
    To me, the most amazing thing is that with all the intellectually astute, articulate people in the Gulch, with a variety of points of view, I've still been right on absolutely everything. :) And a +1 for Eudaimonia.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 10 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    well, we all have blind sides. On that post, I felt(thought) the same I felt (thought) with the mortgage debate. Oh, people signed up for stuff they couldn't pay for...actually, yes, that was happening thanks GOVT, but as well, people who made reasonable decisions lost their homes. wtf?! You can and should say YOUR cronyism hurt millions of families making reasonable decisions, relying on reasonable claims you made to them. It is not victim-hood, it is fraud perpetrated against the citizens of the US, operating within the law and making reasonable assumprions that their govt was not prioritizing one group over another. Do I say to jbrenner's retired parents-you should have prepared for the fact that the US govt would throw you as bond holders under the bus in the auto bail out? no legal precedent was that bond holders were the FIRST to be reimbursed in a bankruptcy. They made their decision based on logical reasoning. Good luck for your children's education and their careers. I think we are screwed.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • 10
    Posted by Zenphamy 10 years, 8 months ago
    And for you Eudamania, thanks for posting and starting the conversation (debate).
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Mimi 10 years, 8 months ago
    The thread was a fine read, Eud. Thanks for that.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Snoogoo 10 years, 8 months ago
    Yes! Logical, rational debate between mutually respectful, consenting individuals. As long as we can agree on that, we can have lots of fun disagreeing with one another and likely learn something from it in the process!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 10 years, 8 months ago
    what? I have to disagree with you in order to make you think? :)
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo