Obama to name longtime political aide as 'Ebola czar,' bypassing senior health official | Fox News

Posted by $ rockymountainpirate 10 years, 11 months ago to Government
17 comments | Share | Flag

President Obama plans to name Ron Klain, a longtime political hand with no apparent medical or health care background.

A Czar by any other name is still a bureaucrat owed a favor.
SOURCE URL: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/10/17/obama-to-name-ebola-czar/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 10 years, 11 months ago
    The same old solution... Don't actually take charge and do something; just hire another flunky and pay him too much to do nothing. All show and no go. Optics problem solved temporarily in the eyes of the "useful idiots."
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by richrobinson 10 years, 11 months ago
    I saw Obamas comments last night. He said if he appointed a Czar it would not be because the HHS secretary and CDC director weren't doing a great job. It would be to take some pressure off because they had so many other duties. I don't think these idiots know what real work looks like. In addition to that everyone in his administration has so far done a lousy job. Insulting.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 10 years, 11 months ago
    I never got the need to "czars". It always sounded bizarre to me.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by Zero 10 years, 11 months ago
      Downright sinister.

      It's amazes me the title caught on without negative connotation.

      An unelected official, all powerful within his domain, a lord above any oversight except his master's.

      Yeah, we need a bunch more of those!
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by CircuitGuy 10 years, 11 months ago
        "It's amazes me the title caught on without negative connotation. "
        Me too! The name sounds like one of two things:
        1. A sinister way of giving one unelected person broad powers justified by some boggyman of the day.
        2. A large organization isn't effective at dealing some problem. Poor management leads to finger-pointing and inaction. Everyone's just keeping their head down. The only way to get people to take action is to appoint one person who will take the credit or the fall. That one person will be motivated to take action b/c she can't avoid blame, and everyone else can say they were just following the czar if things don't go right.

        So it looks either sinister or inept.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo