I don't care if wind power works or not (and after talking with an actual repair engineer, I know its an absolute joke), it shouldn't be subsidized by my tax dollars.
When a greenie looks at one of these windmills and sees the blades turning they may get a warm inner glow. Fantasy, blades must turn to prevent shaft bending and bearing seizing, often they are consuming, not generating, electric power. I understand that some of the bigger ones have diesel motors built in. The net electricity generation could not justify a 100 year installation, about 10 years is more like it.
I shared an airplane ride sitting next to a repair engineer. He said that one of the major problems of the wind turbines is that they weren't designed to withstand major temperature fluctuations - ie they were developed in France for temperate weather. Having come from Montana with some of the the most extreme temperature in the US (>100 F in summer, -40 F in winter common), this was a staggering acknowledgement. He said that the turbines there were lucky to be operational 25% of the time. That's just operational - not just spinning.
I did the calculations one time and even with one of those things spinning 100% of the time, the payback was 15-20 years (without subsidies). What a freaking boondoggle.
Fantasy, blades must turn to prevent shaft bending and bearing seizing, often they are consuming, not generating, electric power. I understand that some of the bigger ones have diesel motors built in. The net electricity generation could not justify a 100 year installation, about 10 years is more like it.
I did the calculations one time and even with one of those things spinning 100% of the time, the payback was 15-20 years (without subsidies). What a freaking boondoggle.