Robotics and Population Decline

Posted by VetteGuy 1 day, 7 hours ago to Technology
5 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

I've noticed a lot of "news" reporting on these two topics lately. Am I the only one who sees that these two phenomena could be complimentary? Population declines, but at the same time, we need fewer workers because robots are doing more jobs. I have not seen any reports that link these two issues. Could they offset each other? What would that look like? Is Asimov's Solaria [From The Naked Sun] the future of humanity?


All Comments

  • Posted by freedomforall 6 hours, 9 minutes ago in reply to this comment.
    Agree completely. šŸ‘
    Except for the arguable issue of our population eventually being overrun by the 3rd world over-populated
    shit-hole invaders, reducing the US population is not a problem, its an improvement.
    (No, don't kill anyone, just make the 135,000,000 invaders and their progeny leave.)
    This assumes that the robots doing the work have to pay double or triple (or whatever is necessary) to
    support those over 55 (who paid in all their working lives and) who were promised that social security
    would provide enough to live above poverty in retirement after 66 years old.
    For everyone under 55, pay their 'contributions' into a "Trump retirement account" and hire the best
    available to invest it for them to provide for their "golden years."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 6 hours, 56 minutes ago in reply to this comment.
    That would have been sometime in the mid-60's if my brief research is right. And I agree, things seemed to be much more pleasant.

    Had an interesting discussion with a health care provider a couple months back: How different life would be if everyone asked "What would Andy Griffith Do?" I know life was not perfect in those days, but it seems there was not the animosity that runs rampant now.

    It's one of the reasons I like driving on the small-town sections of Route 66. People are helpful, friendly and polite.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 8 hours, 9 minutes ago
    What population is declining? It seems to me "first world" is declining while third world is increasing, especially third world living within the first world territories. First world robotics may be assisting first world decline while also assisting third world increase. It just seems first world is nurturing third world with a flood of free stuff while turning a blind eye to its own people. Just thinking out loud here with only demographic observations of Europe, North America, and Australia.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by pamzt 9 hours, 54 minutes ago
    Thank you for saying what I’m thinking. Why is negative population growth a bad thing? Automation requires less workers. More folks can live in better first world conditions. I think the third world problems will continue until they expel the corruption, dictatorships and embrace open markets and capitalism. Africa has a huge amount of human capital but the above has prevented any significant change in their lives and economic growth.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 18 hours, 10 minutes ago
    As long as the robots have to pay into social security and medicare. ;^)
    US was a much more pleasant place when the population was less than 200 million.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo