Figure’s General Purpose Robot: Does 2026 Change Everything?

Posted by freedomforall 11 hours, 44 minutes ago to Technology
4 comments | Share | Flag

Excerpt:
"When I first visited Figure, they had several hundred thousand lines of C++ code controlling the robots. Handwritten. Expensive. Brittle.

Every new behavior required engineers to anticipate edge cases, write more code, test it, debug it. It was the software equivalent of teaching a toddler to walk by writing an instruction manual.

In the last year, Figure deleted 109,000 lines of C++ code.

All of it. Gone.

What replaced it? A single neural network that controls the entire robot: hands, arms, torso, legs, feet. Full-body coordination. Real-time planning. Dynamic response to unexpected situations.

This is Helix 2, their latest AI model, and it’s a fundamentally different approach to robotics.

Here’s why this matters: neural nets learn from experience, not instructions.

You don’t code a robot to “grab a cup.” You show it thousands of examples of grasping objects—different shapes, weights, materials—and the neural net extracts the underlying patterns. It learns what “grasping” is at a representational level.

And once it understands grasping? It can generalize to objects it’s never seen before.

Brett put it simply: “If you can teleoperate the robot to do a task, you can train the neural net to learn it.”

That’s the unlock. If the hardware is capable—if the motors, sensors, and joints can physically perform the movement—then the AI can learn it from data.
--------------------------------------------
Robots building robots that can withstand vacuum of space.
That's the key to a city on Mars, unlimited raw materials mined from the asteroid belt, and human habitats built from asteroids.


All Comments

  • Posted by 3 hours, 20 minutes ago in reply to this comment.
    I'm not sure that most humans are in 'growth mode'.
    I think that may be true of the small minority that think beyond their immediate locale and imposed limits.
    The rest of humanity are observers and consumers, not pioneers, imo.
    They may become pioneers if their situation is sufficiently limiting, e.g., colonists of America that were debtors or felt otherwise oppressed.
    That may still become the case given how poorly governments are currently treating many people, imo.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Commander 3 hours, 55 minutes ago in reply to this comment.
    The same question arises: What is the technological threshold that precludes the expansionism model that has prevailed for at least 5000 years. Contemporary humans are always in growth mode. What about static stability?
    This new space frontier will be for too small a minority to matter. The likelihood of our present physiology leaving the uniqueness of this solar system will not be done without substantive genetic alteration .... oh wait, Bill has that covered.

    Too much change in too little time. For those who are not prepared the affects may be devastating.
    Toffler: Future Shock 1970
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 6 hours, 6 minutes ago in reply to this comment.
    How about a Gulch in space for the people who are willing to take risks for freedom and reward?
    With space habitats, the frontier challenge is back, I think.
    Granted, there is a long road to that frontier.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Commander 6 hours, 24 minutes ago
    Alrighty then ............ might as well get rid of 98% of our species. Only about 2% are creators.
    And then .... where are the consumers? And .... way too many robots. This could be an Achilles Heel in respect to a Gulch.

    A species that is not challenged will always suffer attrition in basic survival instinct. To the point of extinction?
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo