Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by freedomforall 2 days, 2 hours ago
    If a comparison were made of the IQ of NASA engineers on this program vs the engineers on
    the Apollo program, would the DEI of NASA's Artemis program be exposed as deficient?
    And what would the contract awards on the Artemis program show ?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 2 hours, 53 minutes ago
    Cryogenic embrittlement is a surprisingly big problem. A part of my job is to make sure the engineers know what all the potential rocketry issues could be ... and to troubleshoot proactively.

    Liquid helium and liquid hydrogen are much colder than liquefied methane that SpaceX uses. Is it any wonder that SpaceX is more reliable?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ Snezzy 46 minutes ago
      It's rocket surgery. We're not supposed to understand. I did poke around on the NASA website to see if there were any tech details; found nothing. Do we know what trail of decisions led to the choice of fuel technology?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 2 days, 4 hours ago
    Better to catch these problems before launch even if it is disappointing.

    Interesting line in the article: "Artemis 2 will send three NASA astronauts and one Canadian on a roughly 10-day trip around the moon and back to Earth in a Orion capsule." /s The terms America or Americans isn't mentioned once in the article so exactly who are those "NASA astronauts"?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo