- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Me dino dunno.
Maybe I should flip a coin.
Oops, there's always a toilet handy.
Thanks, OUC, for this morning's wakeup.
And why capture killers libtarded Jackass Party judges shall surely D.E.I. pat on the heads an put on our streets to kill again?
Me dino sez blow ALL those death merchandising killers all to hell!
As an example to ALL!
[]The Act itself does not explicitly authorize the summary destruction of vessels. Recent military actions involving lethal force against suspected drug boats (in late 2025) have been highly controversial and have drawn criticism from legal experts and lawmakers, who argue that such strikes, absent an imminent threat to life or an active armed conflict, may constitute unlawful killings.[]
[]The justification for recent lethal strikes has been based on the assertion that certain drug cartels are "foreign terrorist organizations" and pose an immediate threat, allowing the use of force under the laws of armed conflict.[]
Lots of hemming and hawing here but what stands out to us is: These Drug Traffickers are Violent, Armed and in the act of evading arrest.
Trust that they were hailed prior to a Lethal Strike.