All Comments

  • Posted by $ 4 hours, 48 minutes ago in reply to this comment.
    I know, I'm not even sure I should bother seeing that my probability of living another 10/20 years is very low, not to mention that environmental conditions will continue to deteriorate making survival even more difficult.

    If only for the latter, it still might be wise to exit heavily populated areas.

    Still available, Ben's Earth Disaster Cycle (the cycle resets soon) and "The sun, the earth and the disaster cycle" books-(downloads) are one BIG resource documents besides telling the story our ancestors knew well.

    If the opportunity arises for you, you might want to visit Observer Ranch in Colorado for one of many weekend events.
    It's not far from where I spent my time in the army; Colorado Springs/Manitu Springs/Pikes Peak/Cheyenne Mt/Fort Carson. If I had someone to stay with my wife, I'd be there every weekend in one of their cabins or campsites or sell my house and build a home on or near the ranch.
    Elevation and other factors are just right for survival.

    I did sign up for a digital (mental) survival course that gives one the proper mind set to make those decisions and offering money saving options from learned experiences.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 5 hours, 42 minutes ago in reply to this comment.
    I'd have to ask about the precise timing of the 'tropical past' of Antarctica.
    There are other theories about how warm the entire earth was in the distant past
    (+-millions of years), but I don't know if they conflict with the dating of the ice cores.
    I don't have the knowledge to fault either the disaster cycle theory or the ice core dating.
    Based on the disaster cycle theory's predictions, I haven't the funds to adequately prepare for it.
    Neither do 99.99999% of the people living, especially since there is no clear path for survival
    given current technology.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 6 hours, 7 minutes ago in reply to this comment.
    They are either reading the ice cores wrong or reading them wrong on purpose. There are serious problems with every different way they try to read the time line, but it's obvious that they are either stupid or complicit.
    The Poles meeting which creates almost a negative magnetic field and the Sun's reaction to that causes the crust to release from the mantle and the weight of the ice wants to be at the equator. Einstein knew this to be true but didn't know what the trigger was. Traveling through the galactic current sheet every 12K years is what starts this process and similar reactionary events on all the planets. Right now, Pluto has lost much of it's atmosphere, Neptune and Uranus are undergoing massive changes.

    Ben touched on that a few times along the way.
    The most important things are revealed in the "what's " actually happening in our solar system and each of the planets right now, The 'current' physically observed data tells the whole story, ie, the physical changes we note on our own planet.

    Ask yourself: How could the antarctic and Greenland have tropical pasts . . . . . . . .

    Go to spaceweather (S0) on youtube and follow along. we get constant and monthly updates on the field etc along with the daily space weather report.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 7 hours, 49 minutes ago
    OUC, the recent study regarding ice cores in the Antarctic from several million
    years ago raises a questions on the disaster cycle for me.
    (See: https://www.galtsgulchonline.com/post... )

    My questions:
    If the magnetic poles move as much as the disaster cycle proposes, how is the
    apparent existence of stable ice cores millions of years old on Antarctica explained?
    Would the cold polar regions follow the magnetic poles?
    Perhaps I don't understand, but would the shifting poles cause the tilt of the Earth to change
    and the warm equator to exist at a different location as well?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 1 month, 3 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    My Wife birthday was 2/9/54, seems all that amorousity carried forward! Laughing

    Thanks for your comments and insights, Freedom
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 1 month, 3 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    Gona put aside the 64 bucks and get this course. Don't know what God has planned for me but it couldn't hurt to take the course even though I don't see me making it another 10-20 years . . . turning 74 this week.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 73SHARK 1 month, 3 weeks ago
    As if the magnetic poles switching and the 6,000/12,000 year apocalyptic cycles weren't coming in about 20 years wasn't enough, now we've got this. Bummer.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 1 month, 3 weeks ago
    A new site being developed https://www.disastercycle.film
    Nothing here just yet
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo