13

Soros' Open Society Funneled $80 Million To Pro-Terror Groups

Posted by freedomforall 2 days, 13 hours ago to Politics
23 comments | Share | Flag

Excerpt:
"Since 2016, George Soros's Open Society Foundations (OSF), now run with his son Alexander, has poured over $80 million into groups tied to terrorism or extremist violence. The evidence is stark: Open Society has sent millions of dollars into U.S.-based organizations that engage in "direct actions" that the FBI defines as domestic terrorism. These groups include the Center for Third World Organizing and its militant partner Ruckus Society, which trained activists in property destruction and sabotage during the 2020 riots, and the Sunrise Movement, which endorsed the Antifa-linked Stop Cop City campaign, in which activists currently face over 40 domestic terrorism charges and 60 racketeering indictments. At the same time, Open Society awarded $18 million to the Movement for Black Lives, a group that co-authored a radical guide that glorifies Hamas's October 7 massacre and instructs activists in the use of false IDs, blockades, and economic disruption.

Nor is the danger confined to America's streets. Open Society has funneled more than $2.3 million into Al-Haq, a nongovernmental organization (NGO) based in the West Bank and long accused of ties to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), which the European Union and the United States designate as a foreign terrorist organization."
SOURCE URL: https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/new-report-reveals-soros-open-society-funneled-80-million-pro-terror-groups


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by mccannon01 2 days, 10 hours ago
    From a clip in the article: "Classifying ANTIFA (a loose and decentralized association) as a “major [domestic] terrorist organization” may prove largely symbolic..." I've seen the left describe ANTIFA as a "loose decentralized" organization before and I didn't buy it then and I don't buy it now. If that were true, then how is it large numbers of "foot soldiers" can be called to action quickly and simultaneously in multiple locations? Now we can also ask if it is so "loose" who cashes the checks and where does the money go? My guess it had Soviet (Stalin) roots and competed with the Nazis to rule Germany in the '30s. We know who won that one, who will win this one?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ jbrenner 2 days, 9 hours ago
      Is it a good thing or a bad thing that Antifa is called a terrorist organization? It clearly is a terrorist organization, but labeling them as such enables the Trump administration to use force, which Objectivism forbids. Not labeling them as a terrorist organization enables Antifa to continue its evil ways. This may be a situation that Objectivism has no good answer for? Damned if we do, damned if we don't.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • 10
        Posted by mccannon01 1 day, 19 hours ago
        From what I've seen Antifa has already initiated the force virtually everywhere they show up. Smashing, burning, and hurling projectiles at police isn't peaceful protesting. Often it looked planned in advance and then mayhem orchestrated by a few for the many to unfold on the streets. They are a force to initiate force. I believe Rand would recognize Antifa for what it is.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ jbrenner 1 day, 14 hours ago
          How much force should we use to oppose that kind of force?
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by mccannon01 1 day, 11 hours ago
            The foot soldiers can be taken down on the spot as hard as the law allows (and unmasked for all to see) or chased down using video and other evidence and then prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. If the FBI and other law enforcement can be mobilized for taking down grandmothers taking selfies in the Capitol on J6, getting some of these perps after the mayhem they produce should be a priority. You get the soldiers and work your way up their chain of command. Find the money and follow it, too. RICO likely comes in to play here as well. No getting off for the guilty - long jail time 100%. And NONE of these perps should be allowed to become college professors in their future like some of the Marxist dirt from the '60s and '70s. IMHO this is a long term problem that started before I was born - I'm 73.

            Edit add: I'm looking for a book I read a couple of decades ago, but can't find it. It was a true story written by a pair of FBI agents that infiltrated and basically took down the KKK in the '50s and '60s. It was a long tough haul, but they succeeded. Taking down ANTIFA should go about the same. Maybe today's FBI should read that book.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by CaptainKirk 1 day, 12 hours ago
            Ask the Proud Boys. In an incident where they defended others, AntiFa had masks, and FLED. They stayed. MANY Got Jail Time and were heavily punished. (Do you think the cops used the Cell Phone data which could have easily been used to identify AntiFa people? NOPE. Only against us).

            Choose your battles wisely. Once you fight back. It's a form of Suicide. Be willing to die for your cause. We are fighting pure evil.

            And the correct force... PUNISHING Legal Action. Just like the Proud Boys got. Because they stopped defending after that!
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by fairbro 1 day, 14 hours ago
    Don't forget Bill Gates. The guy who engineered the biggest scam ever, who caused more misery for more people in the history of the world, with his crappy "Windows" O/S (while bankrupting all other competitors offering open-source, user-friendly and user-in-control O'S's), now calls himself a "Philanthropist."

    The Left Coast oligarch says he's not going to support Soros' umbrella Arabella, now he will give to Arabella's constituent groups directly. And call it "reform". Like another update to Co-pilot Windows.

    Gates, I don't need a left-wing bigot on my computer telling me what to think.

    To get rid of Gate's leftist AI crap "Co-pilot", hit the Windows key, go to settings, apps and uninstall Co-pilot.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by CaptainKirk 1 day, 12 hours ago
      Well, it worked for awhile. We could not get Scott Adams to see that Gates was evil, because he saw him wrapped up in his "Giving". I think terminal bone cancer from the Vaxx changes peoples mind...
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by fairbro 1 day, 11 hours ago
        I got one Moderna jab, then I 1) Got Coivd; 2) Discovered the jab alters your DNA
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ jbrenner 17 hours, 37 minutes ago
          Vaccines are actually designed to alter your DNA. The presumption is that that alteration is a good thing. As with all things in an Ayn Rand world, one should check one's premises. Certainly no one's government checked its premises.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by katrinam41 11 hours, 44 minutes ago
    I would guess the $80 million dollar figure will jump considerably higher as more is uncovered. I would say, and this is not a guess, that any decision to put citizens under physical fire will never be a quick and easy decision for those who have an intact moral and ethical compass. Looking at the past history of such incidents tells me that one major mindset has been responsible for the worst decisions in this country's history. It doesn't matter in what party you claim membership. What matters are your actions in a crisis. The real horror of it all is just how many of us have this mindset. How long before the perpetrators reveal themselves to declare extinction of those who disagree? And how many will join in, thinking (actually non-thinking) that they have the self-appointed right to be judge, jury and executioner? Thank the soros funds and other like-minded one-worlders for decades of brainwashing, and save your pity. We were warned.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 7 hours, 21 minutes ago
    This here just me dino bottom line common sense.
    To fund terrorism is an act of terrorism. Period!
    Why Daddy and Sonny Soros are not already very well rotting away in a federal prison is way beyond me.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by LarryHeart 1 day, 16 hours ago
    Force for self defense is not forbidden. Where is your common sense. BTW everything is force. Force fields are the underpinning of everything.
    Maybe you are talking about the Force in star wars. Not watching those puppet full movies would be ok to be forbidden. lol
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ jbrenner 1 day, 7 hours ago
      I am certainly not saying that force for self defense is forbidden. The head FCC commissioner, when he was one of the commissioners in the minority, prevented the FCC from trampling on free speech. Arguably now that he is the FCC commissioner, he is threatening Disney/ABC. I am not a fan of either party using government force as a bludgeoning tool.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by 18 hours, 11 minutes ago
        It's a difficult trade-off to manage, isn't it.
        Should a government agent be empowered to use force to stop public 'indecency' ?
        Should urination in public be such a crime?
        What about nudity or public expression of sexual acts?
        Where does the use of force stop and who decides when such force is allowable?

        imo, all people are affected by their experiences (are 'corruptible'.)
        Should young people be protected from certain activities until they old and experienced enough to understand them?
        Who decides 'immorality' and who enforces it?
        Are there examples from history to guide those decisions?

        When does political speech or action become immoral and subject to legal use of force or even revolution?
        Waco? Ruby Ridge? Invasion of Iraq?
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ jbrenner 17 hours, 38 minutes ago
          When I was Faculty Senate president in 2008, I discovered that I governed more like an Objectivist than the personally conservative person that I am. It is a surprisingly difficult balance to manage.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo