10

Who Was John Snow and How Is His Work Relevant Today?

Posted by freedomforall 4 days, 7 hours ago to Politics
6 comments | Share | Flag

Excerpt:
"John Snow is a bona-fide hero of science. ... Snow might be one of the most famous doctors in the great pantheon of famous historical epidemiologists. Epidemiologists often celebrate Snow as the crowning example of the triumph of scientific reasoning and “medical detective work.” But that is rank revisionism. Snow IS a hero, but he’s definitely not Science’s hero.

Science appropriated John Snow after he died penniless and forgotten, whitewashing their culpability. But Snow was never one of their own. He was opposed by Science at every step.

Cholera has plagued mankind since the dawn of history. It is still plagueing us. Just a handful of years ago in 2010, UN Peacekeepers set up a camp in Haiti to “help” those unfortunate citizens recover from a devastating earthquake. The Peacekeepers needed to evacuate their sewage somewhere; a local river seemed like a good spot. And so the cholera epidemic created by the United Nations condemned 10,000 Haitians to horrible deaths and sickened countless more.

image.png
In 2016, after six years of lawsuits, the UN finally admitted responsibility. Sorry, Haiti. The checks are still in processing.
...
But perhaps the most significant and enduring story out of all the many cholera stories is the true story of how John Snow, a “simple anesthesiologist,” single-handedly — against all odds — saved humanity from remaining mere playthings for the disease. Despite science’s revisionist efforts to claim him for themselves, John Snow was a free thinker. He rejected “scientific consensus,” and thought for himself.

And they destroyed him for it."
SOURCE URL: https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/no-consensus-friday-october-17-2025


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by mccannon01 3 days, 12 hours ago
    Interesting article. The phrase "snow job" comes to mind. The establishment was accusing Snow of snowing the public all the while the consensus was the snow job. Hmmm, now where have I seen such antics in today's world...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by tonay 4 days, 5 hours ago
    I apologize but this is absolutely not true. Snow did not die penniless and forgotten. He was a well respected anesthesiologist. His cholera work was contentious upon publication but ultimately accepted by major scientific figures during that time such as by Farr, and Simon. Who had enabled Snow's investigations by gathering much of the data necessary. The source of the early skepticism was due to Snow making a rather incomplete argument in his South London study, but Simon recognizing the kernel of genius within it, replicated Snows work correctly.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by CaptainKirk 1 day, 9 hours ago
      tonay, due to whitewashing of history, and my trust in C&C Childress who penned this... (And my knowledge of Rife, and the guy who introduced hand washing before delivering babies), I am skeptical.

      We know: (WikiPedia)
      It was not until 1866 that William Farr, one of Snow's chief opponents, realised the validity of his diagnosis when investigating another outbreak of cholera at Bromley by Bow and issued immediate orders that unboiled water was not to be drunk.

      This is 8yrs after his death.

      He made a lot of Anesthetic studies/research, which is what I am sure he lived off of.

      Again, I cannot challenge your statements. And I am open minded enough to realize I also cannot know the truth without knowing some real first-hand or solid second hand information.

      But again, thank you for the comment. The probability that he died penniless has been reduced.

      But the odds that the event you mentioned happened BEFORE he died seems to have a much much lower probability.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by tonay 2 hours, 44 minutes ago
        I would recommend reading the primary sources. Historical events tend end up like a game of telephone on sites like wikipedia. Plenty of sources reaffirming Snow's work prior to his death. The government literally replicated his work correctly for deficiencies in 1856. Similarly, Farr acknowledged Snow's work prior many years prior to 1866. However, in 1866, the last major cholera epidemic in London, they used the technique Snow pioneered to identify corporate malfeasance by a certain water company, cementing Snow's place. All of these reports have been digitized and are easily available through sites like wellcome collection and archive.org.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 4 days, 5 hours ago
      No need to apologize, tonay.
      I'd love to hear more about this if you would post the source of your knowledge. 👍
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by tonay 2 hours, 52 minutes ago
        John Snow between 1855 - 1856 was the President of the London Medical Society. I believe it would be accurate to say Snow was part of the scientific establishment. Now regarding the events the best source is the Chief Medical Officer of London, John Simon's report, "1856 Report on the Last Two Cholera Epidemics of London as affected by the consumption of impure water". It can easily be found online. In the report they quite literally redo Snow's south london study, correcting for deficiencies in Snow's earlier argument. Snow later used their data to republish the study himself.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo