13

Revolutionary Reform in Autism Research and Treatment

Posted by freedomforall 2 weeks ago to Science
21 comments | Share | Flag

Excerpt:
"The package is sweeping. It elevates environmental and pharmaceutical exposures to first-class research questions, directs label changes with clinical relevance, and begins to dismantle sacred cows that have stifled honest inquiry for a generation.

The Headline Moves
Trump led with the cultural taboo: acetaminophen. He urged that during pregnancy it be used “only when medically necessary,” warned against reflexive dosing of children “every time they receive a vaccine,” and linked these positions to rising rates of autism that have “destroyed families” and imposed massive social costs. He also called for smaller vaccine doses on a more spread-out schedule, and he previewed a CDC policy modernization: the separation of MMRV into its component measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella vaccinations. He called ending the routine HepB birth dose a “revolution,” arguing that a sexually transmitted infection does not justify a blanket neonatal exposure.

Kennedy matched that candor point for point. He called the decades-long fixation on “the genetics of autism” fruitless by design, the equivalent of studying lung-cancer genomes while banning the word “cigarettes.” He announced that HHS will move on acetaminophen: FDA will require safety-label changes on acetaminophen-containing products, with specific caution in pregnancy and prudent use in children. He insisted on the “lowest effective dose” standards and promised a series of follow-on reports that will examine all plausible contributors—vaccines included—with “no taboos.” Mothers will not be gaslit. The period of neglect is over."


All Comments

  • Posted by $ jbrenner 1 week, 5 days ago in reply to this comment.
    This one isn't, but my nanotech minor is. I figured I am paying as a producer to advertise.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CaptainKirk 1 week, 5 days ago in reply to this comment.
    All drugs have serious side effects. Your job is to take the ones where the side effects ~= your goals. LOL.

    And Vioxx DID kill people. And they KNEW it would happen. It's the Ford Pinto thing all over again. It was well known, but so profitable, they didn't care.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by rhfinle 1 week, 5 days ago
    I heard someone remark about Robert Kennedy Jr.:
    "Finally, here's the good Kennedy that they took from us all those years ago."
    ...and, of course, the libtards are trying to get him out of HHS, before he can do damage to their interests.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 1 week, 5 days ago in reply to this comment.
    It looks like my paying for the marketplace is finally going to start returning value for value. I knew it would eventually.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 1 week, 5 days ago in reply to this comment.
    Sounds good. I like the idea of not having to use chemicals and your device is a leap in the right direction. I'll be paying attention. Thanks.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 1 week, 5 days ago in reply to this comment.
    That is the hope. I will readily admit that, while I know that my device puts out light, I am still doing the biological testing. Others have documented the biological effects of certain wavelengths on certain pathogens. What I did was develop a device that acts like a Swiss Army knife. If one wavelength doesn't work, then at least one of the other five will disrupt different protein functions.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 1 week, 5 days ago in reply to this comment.
    Mehmet Oz said something very interesting yesterday that we should all instinctively know, "If a drug or therapy is powerful enough to help some people, it is also powerful enough to have side effects." This is a paraphrase.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Abaco 1 week, 6 days ago in reply to this comment.
    I absolutely loved Vioxx with my football background...and a body wracked with injuries. It was very effective, life changing. But, I got off of it fairly quickly once they published that it was killing people. Interesting....
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Abaco 1 week, 6 days ago
    science = good.

    "I follow the science" = evil

    You're welcome...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 1 week, 6 days ago in reply to this comment.
    Thanks. I have an area of my basement that is crawl space 5ft floor to ceiling with a sump pump in the far corner. When the water runs high in the rainy/snow melt season the usual mildewy aroma can be detected - not strong but irritating (yes, the area is vented, but maybe not enough). I'm not fond of using chemicals to clean the air, which I do every few years. After looking at your product I was wondering if blasting the area with it on some automatic schedule would do the trick. Set it and forget it?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 1 week, 6 days ago in reply to this comment.
    Thanks, mccannon. Yes, it is effective against molds and mildews, too. The concept for the product is that, while UV lamps use one wavelength that does kill most pathogens, my product uses a range of wavelengths, each of which is chosen to disrupt a different protein function. It is kind of like a Swiss Army knife like tool/weapon against pathogens.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Lucky 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    Following on from jbrenner there is the inventor Elliott Jaques. He put forward the idea of the time span of control. That the worth of an employee is related to the time interval over which they can operate without supervision- unskilled labor a few hours, a dedicated professional- months or years. This idea came out at about the same time as Rand was writing.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Lucky 2 weeks ago
    Some progress.
    It is good to see the name Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford.
    He was one of the three originators of 'the Great Barrington Declaration', big gov and big media first denigrated them - the top three of their profession, then got them banned.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    "I was one of a profession that came last in human history and will be (in my case, was) first to vanish on the way back to the sub-human". ― Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged

    "The great creators—the thinkers, the artists, the scientists, the inventors—stood alone against the men of their time. Every great new thought was opposed. Every great new invention was denounced... But the men of unborrowed vision went ahead. They fought, they suffered and they paid. But they won." ― Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged

    "An inventor is a man who asks 'Why?' of the universe and lets nothing stand between the answer and his mind". - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged

    Fauci was Floyd Ferris.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    While I will wear both my company's and my university's shirts at various times there, I think I will use my black Atlas Shrugged: Now Non-Fiction shirt as a table covering.

    Should I ask purchasers to recite Galt's oath?
    “I swear by my life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.”
    ― Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged

    “A farmer will not invest the effort of one summer if he’s unable to calculate his chances of a harvest. But you expect industrial giants—who plan in terms of decades, invest in terms of generations, and undertake ninety-nine year contracts—to continue to function and produce, not knowing what random caprice in the skull of what random official will descend upon them at what moment to demolish the whole of their effort. Drifters and physical laborers live and plan by the range of a day. The better the mind, the longer the range. A man whose vision extends to a shanty, might continue to build on your quicksands, to grab a fast profit and run. A man who envisions sky-scrapers will not” (p. 978).
    ― Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 2 weeks ago
    Very interesting. Acetominophen is selective for the COX-2 pathway. One reason I was shadow-banned is that I pointed out that it looked like (and now confirmed) that so was COVID-19. Acetominophen would have worked for pain relief from COVID far better than aspirin. Some people wondered why it took 5x as much aspirin to feel their relief than usual. That is because 80% of aspirin's benefit is for the COX-1 pathway. Thus, quite a few people had to take dangerously high doses of aspirin to feel relief. Some of these people didn't realize that until their fevers spiked dangerously out of control.

    I learned a lot about COX-2 from Merck's Vioxx. Vioxx, despite helping my dad from having really intense migraines for years after he got in between the eyes with a golf ball, was taken off the market because lawyers alleged (didn't prove) that it had some adverse side effects.

    All of this made me realize that what everyone was hearing about COVID was wrong, and for that, I was shadow-banned. Like John Galt, I deemed this society not worth of my UV sterilization invention called the VersaTILE... until now that the shadow-banning is over.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHGX4...
    https://www.chem-freesolutions.com/ou...

    Tomorrow night at Medtech and Microelectronics in Kissimmee, FL, the product makes a long-awaited debut.
    https://www.eventbrite.com/e/medtech-...
    It would be a pleasure to meet you there!
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo