Lets spend $200m on an RSV vaccine for babies, but nothing on vitamin D which dramatically reduces risks?

Posted by freedomforall 3 weeks ago to Science
0 comments | Share | Flag

Excerpt:
"Imagine we were spending $200 million to inject pregnant women and vaccinate babies against RSV, and the real cause of many of the life threatening cases was just low vitamin D?

RSV (Respiratory syncytial virus) is something nearly everyone catches by the time they are two years old. It’s like a bad cold. We’ll go on to catch it every few years for the rest of our lives, and it’s really only a problem for babies and the very old.

In the last week by some odd coincidence, the BBC, ABC and CBC all have stories promoting the idea of saving babies with RSV vaccines which often cost $300 dollars each (USD). The government rollouts are being promoted with free advertising on news programs that pretend to be journalists. But not a single journalist asked the obvious question — if most babies recover just fine, what is different about the babies that struggle. Could it be that low vitamin D puts them at risk?

Two studies suggest that babies with low vitamin D are, by golly, 5 to 10 times more likely to need intensive care."
SOURCE URL: https://joannenova.com.au/2024/11/lets-spend-200m-on-an-rsv-vaccine-for-babies-but-nothing-on-low-vitamin-d-which-dramatically-increases-risks/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP


FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo