The Resentment Sentiment (Pursuit vs Laziness) Is it fair?
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. ” (Declaration of Independence).
You do NOT have a RIGHT to the following just because you exist:
Food
Healthcare
A home
A car
A driver's license
A job
A bed
A hot shower
Clothing
Day care
Free rent
Or free ANYthing
You do, however, have the right, and freedom, to PURSUE all of these things, and sometimes it's really really hard work. It is not written anywhere that you HAVE TO pursue happiness, it's up to each individual to decide how happy they want to be and to work toward that accordingly. However, the lazier you are the less happy you'll likely be. Or at least that's the idea.
We have become a society of rewarding laziness on a grand scale. Our entitlement programs cover everything, and more, on the list above, by our social welfare programs (wic, welfare, ssi...) So now we have the laziest of the lazy with every basic need and comfort paid for without any effort on their part. They live comfortably. They have big T.V.s, cell phones, manicures, nice cars, new cloths...the list goes on and on. And yet they have the audacity to be resentful toward those who work hard and have more than they do. The hard workers, in pursuit of their own happiness, now has a big chunk of their earnings taken, by force, by the government (via taxes, fees, fines etc) so the entitlement programs can continue to be funded and support the lazy.
Not only are the lazy resentful of the “rich”, the President actually encourages this sentiment of resentment in his, seemingly daily, media addresses. “Pay your fair share”.... How does HE determine what a person's fair share is? If I earn it, it's mine. THAT'S fair. If you earn it it's yours. THAT'S FAIR. Nobody else has a right to it... taking it from me is, in itself, UNFAIR (and it's also stealing, since when is stealing “fair”.) At some point the tables got turned and now it's “fair” for the lazy to expect the hard workers to fund their happiness instead of pursuing it themselves. Why, or why, are they entitled to anything they don't earn themselves? After all, they have just as much right as I do to pursue happiness, but they CHOOSE not to.
That's the beauty of having rights....they're there for the plucking, but you don't have to do it if you don't want to. What's fairer than that?
There are no negative consequences for being lazy anymore. If you exist then you are entitled to have your basic needs, and more, taken care of by those who work hard everyday. We need to figure out a way to instill a “work hard and earn what you deserve” virtue back into society. These days kids think a farm is a place where they take care of animals instead of realizing that farms are what keep us fed. They think food magically appears on a plate in front of them without any real effort by anyone to make that meal possible. I've said it before, but I'll say it again....there is a direct connection between not having enough to eat, or at least the possibility of not getting enough to eat (hunger), and motivation to work and earn for yourself and your family. As long as we keep taking that possibility off the table (--no pun intended-- ie: feeding people for “free” ), the motivation to work hard, among the lazy, will never happen.
You do NOT have a RIGHT to the following just because you exist:
Food
Healthcare
A home
A car
A driver's license
A job
A bed
A hot shower
Clothing
Day care
Free rent
Or free ANYthing
You do, however, have the right, and freedom, to PURSUE all of these things, and sometimes it's really really hard work. It is not written anywhere that you HAVE TO pursue happiness, it's up to each individual to decide how happy they want to be and to work toward that accordingly. However, the lazier you are the less happy you'll likely be. Or at least that's the idea.
We have become a society of rewarding laziness on a grand scale. Our entitlement programs cover everything, and more, on the list above, by our social welfare programs (wic, welfare, ssi...) So now we have the laziest of the lazy with every basic need and comfort paid for without any effort on their part. They live comfortably. They have big T.V.s, cell phones, manicures, nice cars, new cloths...the list goes on and on. And yet they have the audacity to be resentful toward those who work hard and have more than they do. The hard workers, in pursuit of their own happiness, now has a big chunk of their earnings taken, by force, by the government (via taxes, fees, fines etc) so the entitlement programs can continue to be funded and support the lazy.
Not only are the lazy resentful of the “rich”, the President actually encourages this sentiment of resentment in his, seemingly daily, media addresses. “Pay your fair share”.... How does HE determine what a person's fair share is? If I earn it, it's mine. THAT'S fair. If you earn it it's yours. THAT'S FAIR. Nobody else has a right to it... taking it from me is, in itself, UNFAIR (and it's also stealing, since when is stealing “fair”.) At some point the tables got turned and now it's “fair” for the lazy to expect the hard workers to fund their happiness instead of pursuing it themselves. Why, or why, are they entitled to anything they don't earn themselves? After all, they have just as much right as I do to pursue happiness, but they CHOOSE not to.
That's the beauty of having rights....they're there for the plucking, but you don't have to do it if you don't want to. What's fairer than that?
There are no negative consequences for being lazy anymore. If you exist then you are entitled to have your basic needs, and more, taken care of by those who work hard everyday. We need to figure out a way to instill a “work hard and earn what you deserve” virtue back into society. These days kids think a farm is a place where they take care of animals instead of realizing that farms are what keep us fed. They think food magically appears on a plate in front of them without any real effort by anyone to make that meal possible. I've said it before, but I'll say it again....there is a direct connection between not having enough to eat, or at least the possibility of not getting enough to eat (hunger), and motivation to work and earn for yourself and your family. As long as we keep taking that possibility off the table (--no pun intended-- ie: feeding people for “free” ), the motivation to work hard, among the lazy, will never happen.
If we don't stand up and fight for our right to bear arms, we are going to be slaves, and what do you think slaves get paid, a hand full of rice a day..... that will be your reward for working sun up til sun down...so you better figure out where you stand now, while you still have the right to bear arms. We have already lost the right to protest the king and his castle of czars.... so what is next...
I agree. But (honest question, not baiting) do you think you really have the intestinal fortitude to turn them away when they come to you because they know you've prepped? Do you further have the intestinal fortitude to enforce that at the end of a gun if need be?
This would be a good time to mention a website that was posted on my prepper meetup board:
shtfschool.com
The "school" is proprietary, but there are a lot of public-access blogs. It's written by a guy who lived through a year-long SHTF city scenario during the Balkan wars. Very scary, and very eye-opening.
I can get sidetracked that way, unlike LS. but since I know this about myself, I already work hard at breaking ties with rainbow set. I used to think I was getting fed in some way by those relationships, and now have decided their voting and sanctioning of looting has tipped the scale in favor of danger. they will have to suffer the consequences of their actions and lack of action
when I argue with people who want to be good to the environment, once they can't win an argument on the science part of their conviction, they have to get down to the belief. it usually ends with this-"well, what can it hurt to lessen our footprint?" here's how it hurts: opportunity costs. a very real example of this: Kyoto Treaty. A n almost impossible collection of standards to abide by at immense cost. not just dollars, but scarce dollars. even the richest country in the world would have to decide to dedicate their dollars to the treaty at the cost of something(s) else. a very stark example would be a country like India who to save face in the UN agrees to the treaty-focusing on reducing carbon footprint at the expense of clean water and disease control-much more immediate and important infrastructure concerns for India's poorest citizens. don't get me started on the phony science of carbon footprints.
here you go-it's in three parts-I love Penn and Teller (Teller had a cameo in AS II and talked!)
When I was in the Navy back in the 90's, we went through the Clinton demoralization and I didn't think it could get any worse. Then Bush and the Homeland Security folks started taking rights away. I didn't think it could get much worse. "Surely people will wake up", I thought. Obama makes them look like amateurs. We may be too far gone to pull it back.
My son asked me when the movie ended if we could just quit and move to the Gulch. If only one really existed, we'd be on our way!
The only real employment that is going on is by striving people that have MONEY to spend on the business TO make the money so that they can pay their workers. Not to mention all the hard work for the business upkeep(products, ads, expenses, equipment,etc...)
The average(99.99% of them) idiot that is feeding off the government is a used rotting peace of meat. That person is so untied to reality that nothing but their own enslavement will help them(on the other hand who knows?), but at that point it is too late. All the idiots that are too stupid to think for themselves are being lead around by a carrot on a stick. Once they find out that the stick is actually a whip they are defeated.
The key difference between us and them is not capitalism and communism(that's a factor though). Its the fact that we like freedom and they can't stand to see it. They can't stand to see someone get anywhere in life on their own will because they are jealous leaches that want everything but not the inhabiting will to get that. So the only way to get what they want is to steal it from us, the people that think unbounded by anything.
(Of course their are many key factors, but this one stands out to me the most. What key factors stand out to you the most? Just wondering.)