11

Yet Another Female Diversity Hire Proves Her Competence. Pentagon Deputy Press Secretary Refuses To Rule Out Strikes On Moscow By Ukraine With US Weapons.

Posted by freedomforall 9 months ago to Politics
54 comments | Share | Flag

So, is this part of a plan for a WW3 before the election, or is the incompetence of the administration on display again?
And the Dems have done it again with sKamala.

Excerpt:
"The Pentagon on Thursday was asked by a reporter during the daily briefing whether Ukraine forces' use of American weapons in its ongoing Kursk incursion is "consistent" with US policy of what Ukraine can and cannot do with US weapons. It has become clear that Ukrainian troops are currently using American weapons to attack Russian territory, troops, civilians, and infrastructure.

Spokeswoman Sabrina Singh answered without hesitation that "yes it is consistent with our policy" and explained that Washington has supported the need for "crossfire" from Ukraine back across the border onto Russian positions from which it is being attacked, even if that is on Russian territory. She framed what is happening in Russia's Kursk oblast—an offensive which has entered day four—as 'defensive' in nature.

Singh still tried to point out that it remains US policy for Ukraine to avoid striking deep into Russian territory using American arms; however, when pressed about the scenario of a direct attack on Moscow, she simply said: "I’m not going to put a specific range on it" and thus refused to rule it out."
-----------------------------------------------------


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by tutor-turtle 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Are you a fan of Dr. Joseph P. Farrell by any chance?
    A historian and theologian by training, he is fascinating and well-informed.
    He has written a dozen books on the development of exotic technologies. Past and present.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by fairbro 9 months ago
    Ukraine never existed until 1991..After WW1, Russia was forced to divest itself of Finland, Poland, Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia, a forced "treaty" by all of the countries involved in WW1. England, France, Italy, Germany, they were all worried about Russia, and wanted to split it up, like they did Austria-Hungary, thinking Russia was their common enemy. On maps, Ukraine was consider a "state" within the USSR. Google "map of Europe in 1980". (Before the maps are all "corrected" by Google).

    Putin, in his interview with Tucker Carlson, attempted to place the current Ukraine conflict in this historical context, but I don't know if Tucker got the specifics of it.

    The Ukrainian language itself never existed until the 1880's when it was invented by Austria-Hungary, seeking to create an anti-Russian section of Russia. They set up schools, in the sections of western Russia they controlled, to teach the new language which was cobbled together from Russian and an antique dialect. This is similar to what the Left does in the US today - talking about the "black community" but their media censoring or regarding any mention of the "white community" as "racist."

    In WW2, Germany doubled down on this "divisive separation" of Russia and "Ukraine" and the "Ukrainians" responded in kind, with Nazi-like smaller genocides of their own, against the Poles, Jews and others Today, Ukraine builds monuments to and renames streets after Stepan Bandera, the self-styled Nazi who led the genocides. (Wikipedia has "corrected" his history - he is now a "peace negotiator") .

    This type of "social engineering" practiced today by the West predates WW1 and is out in the open in the West today - affirmative action, preferences, wokism, evaluating groups of people by their skin color, gender, age, class, ethnicities...the social scientists are out of control in the US -. "Social Justice," institutionalization of racist. sexist, ethnic mandates, revoking human laws that all religions agree on like "thou shalt not steal" (Stealing is condoned on the Loony Left Coast). The rest of the world is doing fine. It's only the US that is committing moral hari-kari.

    In Ukraine, the Western-styled social scientists are also out of control - criminalizing the use of the Russian language, closing the 1000-year-old Orthodox church, crushing all other Human Rights, especially the most basic one - Human Right of Self-Determination (so they can force ethnic Russian to live there, and indoctrinate their children to hate Russia).

    The Deep State is an uninvited 3rd party (disruptive like a meddling in-law) to the Ukraine issue, much as NATO has no business in Syria, engineering the overthrow of Assad by aiding ISIS and less psychotic groups.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mhubb 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    i do not get what he is saying either.

    unless you sneak the "device' into someone's nation, it will be seen coming in (bomber, missile)

    using such a device would be a disaster, better a space based laser, energy weapon that would do less damage, take out just what you want to take out
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mhubb 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    i look into stuff like this all the time

    2 stage (and more) are cleaner the larger the yield
    as it only takes the same fission device to start the burn

    so a 250kt and a 5mt could easily have the same fallout

    and you can make a multi stage device with normal explosives starting the burn of the fusion fuel.
    the US had never announces such research (the US had little need having lots of fission material), the Soviets did (by an agent that came over to the US), with the computer power available to the US then and other now, a fission less multistage is possible

    i see this in the realm of Red Mercury
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by tutor-turtle 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I live within 1 mile of a USAF base to the south and a Navel ship yard to the north, In other words I'm ground zero
    The very last thing in the world want is a nuclear exchange. (although I'll be vaporized in a micro second, so I wouldn't suffer much.)
    We have some idiots running (ruining) our once great Republic, in their eyes they think a nuclear exchange would be somehow winnable.
    We're being lead by @$$holes, never underestimate the stupidity of politicians
    I wholeheartedly disagree a nuclear war is winnable. I have no desire to be reduced to my constitute molecules.
    I'm just stating the facts as i see them.
    My point about free energy: the powers that be will never allow it.
    Reposting what I posted below:
    the world as we know it, runs on hydrocarbon fuels: Trains, ships, aircraft, automobiles, heating, appliances beyond count, all run on oil.
    Counting the manufacture of all things that run on hydrocarbon fuels, It is the largest industry on earth, by orders of magnitude.
    Think of the disruption in the economy if free energy suddenly becomes available to everyone?
    I don't think even President Trump would want such a disruption to take place.
    I truly believe this is what he referred to when he told Judge Andrew Napolitano "If you knew what I knew, you, wouldn't release the information either"
    Think: What else could possibly be that disruptive?
    Free energy for the world would certainly qualify as being so earth shattering information, the public can never be told.
    JFK was about to make a "world changing" announcement at the TradeMart, I truly believe he was about to announce ZPE.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by fairbro 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You are right, the Deep State is an uninvited 3rd party to the Ukraine issue, much as NATO has no business in Syria, engineering the overthrow of Assad by aiding ISIS and less psychotic groups.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by fairbro 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "The point being, you can wipe out a continent without the delay fallout. So therefore bombing another country into the stone age is back on the table"

    How could that "be on the table"? Would not "taking out a continent" set off catastrophic climate and geological disruption such as to endanger the entire planet?

    "The incredibly sad part about ZPE is it could be used to end our use of oil for fuel. Limitless free energy."

    What's "sad" about "free energy"? That would end oil wars, for starters...The "disruption to the economy" would be analogous to the horse being replaced by the car. .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by fairbro 9 months ago
    The "eye for an eye" response to "NATO missiles hitting Russian cites" would be "Russian missiles hitting NATO cities" but Putin has showed restraint and is gaining respect in the rest of the world.

    As far as the Pentagon "We just supply the weapons. We are not responsible for what Ukraine does with the weapons," the analogy would be "We (Moscow) just supply the weapons to Mexican cartels, Iran, Hezbollah, etc. What they do with the weapons is their business."

    Ukraine has been NATO proxy territory since 2014, but once rump "Country 404" has outlived its usefulness, the Deep State will toss it aside like a used snot rag.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by tutor-turtle 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Do your own research.
    Air drop Housatonic. October 30, 1962. was 99.99% "clean".
    No desernable radiation. Their words. This could only be achieved without the use of an atom bomb primary.
    Once this was achieved, Operation Dominic was halted. Ask yourself Why stop there?
    Ancient Astronaut series is a hoax, noise to distract. IMHO
    I have personally witnessed these craft in operation.
    No way the maneuvers I witnessed were possible employing publicly available information. Something else is at work here.
    Our government (et. el) have masted anti-gravity. Of this I am sure.
    There are no aliens, we are the aliens.
    How do you know what vehicles are, or are not, using what technologies?
    These technologies are, by the very nature of their capabilities, classified at the very highest levels of classification.
    You, me, are not privy to such information.
    It would be a mistake to limit your imagination to the public misrepresentations of the "state of the art."
    This is intentional. The public can never be informed of such technology.
    Unless you believe the moon landings never happened, the Apollo moon missions could never been possible using current liquid fuel propulsion technologies.
    Think: the world as we know it, runs on hydrocarbon fuels: Trains, ships, aircraft, automobiles, heating, appliances beyond count, all run on oil.
    Counting the manufacture of all things that run on hydrocarbon fuels, It is the largest industry on earth, by orders of magnitude.
    Think of the disruption in the economy if free energy suddenly becomes available to everyone?
    I don't think even President Trump would want such a disruption to take place.
    I truly believe this is what he referred to when he told Judge Andrew Napolitano "If you knew what I knew, you, wouldn't release the information either"
    Think: What else could possibly be that disruptive?
    Free energy for the world would certainly qualify as being so earth shattering information, the public can never be told.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mhubb 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    to the best of my knowledge, all H-bombs, to be specific multistage devices require a fission bomb to start the process

    so there is a certain amount of fallout / radiation

    the Soviets were working on a multistage device that used normal explosives to compress the secondary. i do not believe this was ever achieved while there was still a Soviet Union. the reason, they had a lack of the materials for the primary (fission device)

    no idea what you are referring to

    if ZPE were real, it would have been in use for subs, ships, space
    unless you believe the US Space Fleet exists are detailed in the Ancient Astronaut series
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by tutor-turtle 9 months ago
    People, please understand from 1962 onward, with the creation of a "clean" H-bomb, nuclear war was never off the table.
    What do I mean by Clean? No radioactive fallout.
    H-bomb technology needs such tremendous temperatures and pressures to initiate fusion, the only known way to do this was an atom bomb to set off the fusion reaction, creating the deadly fallout.
    I have been following the recently declassified (2021) documents of Operation Dominic, the last atmospheric tests of nuclear weapons, specifically the last drop: Housatonic. Using RIPPLE technology.
    Using pulsed scalar waves on a rotating plasma can release more energy than an atom bomb. Much more, enough to make even small amounts of Fusion material yield far more energy than could ever be achieved with an atomic device. (Zero Point Energy, or ZPE)
    The point being, you can wipe out a continent without the delay fallout. So therefore bombing another country into the stone age is back on the table.
    The incredibly sad part about ZPE is it could be used to end our use of oil for fuel. Limitless free energy.
    ZPE was discovered by Tesla (of course) the Germans picked up on this in the early 1930's (The Nazi Bell)
    This is the prize we wanted to wrestle from the Russians at the end of the war in Operation Paperclip.
    We got the some scientists and some documentation, but we didn't get the Bell itself, (allegedly it went to Argentina with the escaping Nazis).
    It's been a game of catchup since.
    But by the early-mid 1950's US (and Russia) finally harnessed ZPE.
    This weapon technology is so powerful it can literally crack the planet into ruble (just as Tesla claimed over 100 years ago).
    Forget about getting hit with asteroid, we can do a more complete job of of wiping out plant earth with existing technology... talk about monkeys at the wheel.
    And why aren't we using ZPE?
    Ask the oil oligarchs who are currently running the latest con-game the planet has ever seen if they want to suddenly become broke and powerless.
    They knew it back in 1913 when Tesla first proposed ZPE, they have repressed every attempt at ZPE ever since. Even if they have to kill you to stop you.
    Question for the group: Was this John Galts motor, Ayn Rand alludes to? The puzzle piece sure looks like a good fit.
    Discuss amongst yourselves.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Agree, but let's just start with getting Trump in office, and getting the unbelievable totalitarians out. There is not other practical way to deal with the Deep State, except a rebellion. I'd rather start with Trump.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Blame should be spread to all the Deep State minions in elected office, turn both houses out of Dem control ...
    unfortunately just in time for a planned economic collapse. Averting that should be secondary importance
    only after shutting down 90% of the fedgov and revoking the broadcast licenses of all the woke media companies.
    The last is vital for an end to fake news, state brainwashing, and a chance for reforms to succeed.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 9 months ago
    Best thing for the election, which is far more important than the Ukraine, is for this to escalate prior to the election, and have it all laid at Buy-dum's feet.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ gharkness 9 months ago
    I don't think the two ideas are mutually exclusive. There's no mistaking the incompetence of this administration....and certainly no reason to think WW3 is unlikely to happen, given all that is happening.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mhubb 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    same, i was jus over 1 years old when he was murdered

    seems the excuse given for RFK's murder was his support fir Israel during the 6 day war
    but as the accused killer is likely part of a conspiracy (in some fashion that i can only guess at), who knows.

    as RFK turned anti-war for a war he helped start, RFK is not someone i would have supported if i were old enough
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I wonder if the Kennedy boys inherited their father's antisemitism.
    I was too young when JFK was POTUS, but I have never trusted the Kennedys' motives.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mhubb 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    people like him, i would never question his Love of the United States

    same with JFK and RFK. they made mistakes, were not perfect, but unlike ted the swimmer who went to the KGB to undermine Reagan the Great, i'd never have questions RKF's and JFK's love of America
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    HAD to +1 the Jack Palance reference! The last time I saw him on a talk show he was demonstrating how to do pushups when he was 80 years old. Yeah, we all miss him.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I figure Israel could have burned most of Gaza to the ground by now and didn't have to supply power or aid to the people there. After all, up to 80% of them support Hamas and don't deserve any quarter - they are getting what they voted for. It's time this crap came to an end. The rest of the Arab world doesn't want the "Palestinians" on their turf, either.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mhubb 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    yup
    to quote Curly Washburn from City Slickers
    when he was asking if he killed someone today
    (i ,miss Jack Palance)

    "Day aint over yet"
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mhubb 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Israel has lots of restraint

    the so-call palestinans still exist, don't they?

    and iran is not glowing
    Reply | Permalink  
  • -1
    Posted by $ Abaco 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The Israelis don't have much restraint because restraint comes from the New Testament.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 9 months ago
    Eh...Just another reaction to Biden's abysmal debate performance. I jest...a little. I knew the reaction(s) would be severe. I checked the news this morning for 5 minutes seeing if a nuke had been detonated anywhere...yet.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo