Yet Another Female Diversity Hire Proves Her Competence. Pentagon Deputy Press Secretary Refuses To Rule Out Strikes On Moscow By Ukraine With US Weapons.
Posted by freedomforall 9 months ago to Politics
So, is this part of a plan for a WW3 before the election, or is the incompetence of the administration on display again?
And the Dems have done it again with sKamala.
Excerpt:
"The Pentagon on Thursday was asked by a reporter during the daily briefing whether Ukraine forces' use of American weapons in its ongoing Kursk incursion is "consistent" with US policy of what Ukraine can and cannot do with US weapons. It has become clear that Ukrainian troops are currently using American weapons to attack Russian territory, troops, civilians, and infrastructure.
Spokeswoman Sabrina Singh answered without hesitation that "yes it is consistent with our policy" and explained that Washington has supported the need for "crossfire" from Ukraine back across the border onto Russian positions from which it is being attacked, even if that is on Russian territory. She framed what is happening in Russia's Kursk oblast—an offensive which has entered day four—as 'defensive' in nature.
Singh still tried to point out that it remains US policy for Ukraine to avoid striking deep into Russian territory using American arms; however, when pressed about the scenario of a direct attack on Moscow, she simply said: "I’m not going to put a specific range on it" and thus refused to rule it out."
-----------------------------------------------------
And the Dems have done it again with sKamala.
Excerpt:
"The Pentagon on Thursday was asked by a reporter during the daily briefing whether Ukraine forces' use of American weapons in its ongoing Kursk incursion is "consistent" with US policy of what Ukraine can and cannot do with US weapons. It has become clear that Ukrainian troops are currently using American weapons to attack Russian territory, troops, civilians, and infrastructure.
Spokeswoman Sabrina Singh answered without hesitation that "yes it is consistent with our policy" and explained that Washington has supported the need for "crossfire" from Ukraine back across the border onto Russian positions from which it is being attacked, even if that is on Russian territory. She framed what is happening in Russia's Kursk oblast—an offensive which has entered day four—as 'defensive' in nature.
Singh still tried to point out that it remains US policy for Ukraine to avoid striking deep into Russian territory using American arms; however, when pressed about the scenario of a direct attack on Moscow, she simply said: "I’m not going to put a specific range on it" and thus refused to rule it out."
-----------------------------------------------------
Tech using thorium has been delayed for decades, but is finally being realistically tested and might soon be available.
Clean coal generation technology is already available if government will get out of the way. (I'm not holding my breath for that.)
CO2 is not a pollutant. Its a beneficial gas that gives life to plants.
It remains radioactive for 1000's of years, yes?
Put it inside concrete blocks and bury it in the ocean. What happens when there's an earthquake?
Does not make sense to me, I must be missing something
Like they do with fiat money.
I believe they did it.
The powers that be ain't having any of it.
Not now. Not ever.
the subject is taboo. Poison. Career ending.
It is of higher classification that nuclear weapons.
Of course any information will be scuttled.
Always has, always will be.
Among Tesla's many quotes: "Free energy will never be allowed in the market"
That was over 100 years ago.
We have only gotten more wedded to oil.
It would take another 100 years to annul that marriage. If ever.
There are dozens of documentaries of people who have proposed, not free energy, but better carburetors or more efficient motors, only to be discredited, threatened, or out-right murdered if they didn't shut up.
Announce to the world you have achieved an over-unity device and have proof.
See how quickly you get that unwanted knock at the door.
That's for simply proposing better economy.
Now imagine you're proposing flipping 60% of the worlds economy on it's head.
You'll be dead before the sun goes down.
Can't enjoy fame and fortune when you're not around to enjoy it.
a missile with a missile can be very easy, if the target has a homing beacon, as the Soviet test he reported on did
and a missile that is guided and can change course is NOT the same thing as a laser that has a point organ and MUST be aimed true, with a small amount of sweeping/change allowed to hit the target.
and i am FULLY aware of compartmentalization, the Manhattan Project was loaded with it
the US Navy is going from the 20mm Gatling gun to Sea Ram, a missile system with 27 on mount missiles, using the same radar as CIWS
the missile has a longer range and is guided and more on mount ammo
just not buying the ZPE )we having such tech now), as i do not buy all the "gasoline saving stuff" that allows cars to get 200 miles a gallon or whatever.
there is only so much energy in a gallon of gas....
ZPE may be possible.
fusion is a better bet
Missile defense systems was among the primary programs I worked on.
I am quite sure they were working on exotic technologies, LASAR tech in particular, as it was so hard to hide. Unfortunately I never had the opportunity to be read in to any of those programs.
Compartmentalization being one of the top security measures, nobody was allowed to know what their colleagues were working on, unless you were read into the same program.
Made for interesting lunch times.
Africa to stick her nose where it didn't belong. They sent her packing... with instructions never to return again.
his "death beam"
maybe possible, energy is an issue
and back then, how to aim it was clearly an issue
as it is today with a laser trying to hit a missile
the discovery would be made by others and announced
there are people that WANT to be famous
look at the idiots making dinosaurs and AI
You end up with lots of excess that can't be used part of the time and, unless you
have generation capacity from other sources, lots of shortage other times.
So you end up paying for twice the capacity because you can't easily shut down
and start up generating capacity. Effectively your cost per megawatt goes up, not down.
Australia as it currently exists is a good example of how solar can be a bad way to go.
I agree the money wasted in Ukraine could have been better used to reduce America's
electricity costs, but super insulation of homes or nuclear power would beat solar.
The most corrupt country on the planet.
The money laundering capital of the world.
Bioweapons labs, Drug and weapons trafficking. And worst of all: the child sex slave trafficking.
You got to ask yourself the obvious question: given all this evil, why would Congress be so willing to start WWIII over such an evil pit of sin, unless they are intricately intwined in the evil itself.
Why would the CIA overthrow the legitimately elected government in 2014 only to install the clown who's claim to frame was playing a homosexual that played the piano with his penis on TV?
There is something very evil and sick in our own government to not only approve, but actively engage in it's continued existence.
As his books sold in the millions, he followed what people were interested in. Delving deeper into the mysteries of ancient civilizations and possible advanced technologies lost over eons.
Then he stubbled upon the weird, out of place interest the Nazis had in all things occult related to these suspected ancient technologies and how they could be weaponized if proof of their existence could be validated.
That turned out to be the mother of all rabbit holes.
The Nazis did in fact seemed to glean some sort of insight into advanced technologies: they built the first heavy lift rockets, the first practical jets, the first workable a-bomb, and... the first workable demonstration of electrogravitics (aka: anti-gravity machine) the Nazi Bell.
The Nazis, following Nikola Tesla's work, hit upon a method of tapping ZPE as an unlimited power source. This is what the Bell experiments were all about. And why, after WarII, the allies never got possession of this one piece of high technology.
As Dr Ferrall so astutely points out: We made the Japanese military and government surrender, we made no such demands of the Germans, only their military was forced to surrender, no such demands were made of the German government, (i.e. the Nazis) were never required to surrender. Curious? No?
This is all throughly documented in "Nazi International"
The $200,000,000,000 we threw into the Ukraine bottomless pit last year could have been used to install, free for the consumer, solar cells on 40 million American homes (figuring $5000 a pop (which is realistic price if it is done on a mass scale)). Instead, a sole buyer has to pay $15k and get a puny tax break.
No money is spent to explore options - why not gigantic fields of solar cells in space and some sort of directed-energy beam to transmit the energy down to earth? The Manhattan project got the nuclear bomb delivered with a dedicated, robust research program, where is the same impetus to solve energy issues?
Basically we are spending $trillion a year on bombs and missiles and stuff to destroy things, instead of spending on constructive things. The MIC grows fat and wealthy while US infrastructure deteriorates.
The rest of the world is not so foolishly spending their money, except for the idiots like Hezbollah
It's 80º and humid. I dread to turn on the AC.
I am on a fixed income, so my resources are finite.
My house (cottage) is 900 sq. ft. my electric bill is $300/month and most of my large appliances are propane.
If I could have free (or even low cost) electricity, I would go all electric in a heartbeat.
free energy: the powers that be will never allow it.
yes, I agree, it is a corrupt system.
The US Public Education system has been corrupted - children are not taught morality nor do they learn how the human race has developed spiritually.
Such as our "leaders" are also corrupt, nihilistic and materialist, rejecting basic concepts like "honesty" and all we learned from history and moral development.
This is less a "tech" issue than a "spiritual" issue. It's a race between our spiritual development and our technological advancement.
Load more comments...