18

2,500 football fields of new solar panels destroyed by hail in Texas this week

Posted by freedomforall 1 month ago to Government
20 comments | Share | Flag

Content:
Imagine the outcry if a coal plant was obliterated by hail?
A few days ago, a 3,300 acre solar power plant in Texas suffered major hail damage. This was a plant so new it was still under construction. The Fighting Jays solar project started generating in 2022, but was not expected to be fully complete until the end of 2024. In theory it was supposed to last for 35 years.

It is so large they boasted that it covers 2,499 football fields (like that is a good thing). Despite the vast footprint, it was rated at only 350 MW. At noon at peak production it could generate about half of what one forty year old coal fired turbine makes all day every day, and every night too.

Collecting low density energy is more expensive than the wish-fairies might think.


At an average construction price of $1 million per megawatt the project likely cost about $350 million dollars. In order to rebuild it, they will need to remove and dispose of the broken panels, so it may cost even more.

The Fighting Jays solar farm was insured against hail damage. Presumably insurance premiums will be rising.

Locals are worried about the possibility of contamination with heavy metals, plastics and other chemicals in the local water supply. Hopefully they won’t leave it all there to rot.

On the plus side, the hailstorm reduced some pollution of the Texas energy market.
=============================
More insanity bites the dust?
No, they will get reimbursed for any loss by taxpayers (what else? Joe follows orders) and insurance rates in TX will go up up up.
SOURCE URL: https://joannenova.com.au/2024/03/2500-football-fields-of-new-solar-panels-destroyed-by-hail-in-texas-this-week/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • 10
    Posted by mhubb 1 month ago
    and ALL of them are now hazardous waste

    ALL OF THEM
    and all of this is fraud, based on lies and crap science


    towns ae now demanding companies selling this crap put up bonds to cover the cost of removing these hazardous waste dumps as in 20 years when the panels are worthless the companies are long gone, out of business and the towns are left with the cost of removing this crap
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by tutor-turtle 4 weeks ago
      The highest efficiency panels are made from Gallium arsenide (GaAs).
      Even when not damaged prematurely, they age-out after 20 years. Again, a disposal problem.
      The same is true (although different materials) with wind turbines. Except they age-out in 10-12 years, and are made of unrecyclable materials.

      So it only makes sense that we ban all our hydrocarbon sourced and nuclear power sourced power plants as quick as possible to hasten our demise.

      Can someone explain to me exactly when this world started losing it's collective marbles and become bent on societal suicide?

      I pray to you Jesus, come quick, I'm ready.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by 4 weeks ago
        "when this world started losing it's collective marbles and become bent on societal suicide?"
        imo, this happened when the DeepState bankster cartel realized their Ponzi scheme end was near
        as the USD collapses and they had to crush the middle class serfs to gain complete control before
        a violent armed revolt against the 'ruling' banksters began.
        (Either that or they are extraterrestrials intent on killing off all humans and terraforming earth for their species.)
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Ben_C 1 month ago
    So where were the protective covers to prevent the damage? Oh, wait a minute - they would block the sun. What am I thinking? Wait until home owners experience the same with their roof mounted panels. What a cluster f.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by bfreeman 1 month ago
    "The rest of the story" is that the solar farm would have to last 50-60 years to replace the energy that it took to make them. I have never heard of a solar farm actually lasting 35 years, more likely 20-30 years - or - the next hail storm. Windmills are no better. They need to last 25 to 30 years to replace the energy needed to make them, but none ever last more than 15 to 20 years - or the next bad bearing. Somehow making "generators" that never make their own replacement energy does not seem "sustainable."
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Stormi 1 month ago
    Not at all a surprise. You put in what does not work, and you depend on weather and wildlife to honor it, and this is what stupidity gets you. The UN and Biden have lied about climate, about alternative energy for way too long. Time to expose it for the hoax it is! Climate is driven by sun and Earth cycles, simple as that!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 1 month ago
    I don't know what kind of land is being covered by these things in Texas, but around where I live in western NY they're covering farmland. This isn't going to be good.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by bfreeman 1 month ago
      They are covering rice, soybean, and grazing. Here in central Texas the approach is to scrape off the land, sterilize it, and cover with gravel. There are better ways to support the electric grid and limit the land needed, like modern nuclear reactors.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CaptainKirk 1 month ago
    This is SO TIMELY. I live in Sunny Florida. I spent time every 2-4 years "reconsidering" getting Solar.
    Keeping in mind, my average Electric bill just crept above $200/mo. It was like $150/mo or less for decades. (30 yrs in the house).

    It never added up. The best I could say, is that I was prepaying for 20-30 years of electricity that MIGHT last 20yrs, and would, at best, cover 80% of my electricity, because A/C at night is actually a thing (and my largest contributor). I run my NEW A/C unit at 70 while I am sleeping. Because I can, and I sleep better, which leads to better health.

    Recently, I was trying to see if I could INVEST some money by buying a piece of land (in TX), and load it up with Solar Panels. I Spent some time with Chat Jippity, and getting rough price estimates. Of course, it left off grading the land, maintenance.

    But the end result was... I would NEVER recoup the cost of the panels, wiring, etc. Unless I ate the property taxes, and insurance costs. (ie, it would be better to own the land, and do NOTHING with it).

    When I factored in REMOVAL after 20yrs. OMG. This was pure insanity. See, the goal, like a Storage Building, is to break even while the underlying asset increases in value. And you sell that off in strategic Chunks (at least that's the theory).

    It was all so backwards. It's literally REMEDIATION to clean these up.

    When I saw that headline... I cringed at the potential for loss I would have been absorbing.

    Now, I do have a few solar panels and a battery backup that they charge. Enough to keep my fridge/freezer alive in case a storm takes us out. It is the WORST insurance investment I have made, but I could afford it, and it gives me a few other options. So 80% of the cost was "Peace of Mind, Less Stress"
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 1 month ago
      Super insulation and designing residential structures to last more than 30 years makes much more economic sense.
      (Just not important in a society where moving for employment overrules long term family stability.)
      Reduce the energy needed for heating and cooling, and add resistance to storms with high winds.
      Local builders are resistant to change. Lots of profit in stick buildings that don't last and cost a lot to cool.
      Florida's heat and humidity combined can be a tough problem though for someone who doesn't tolerate sleeping in humid high 70's.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by CaptainKirk 1 month ago
        Yeah, I've paid to almost triple my attic insulation. I installed excellent tinting. Recently, LOW-E Impact Windows. Suffice it to say I pay A LOT more attention to details than my neighbors... Who consistently spend $100 more/month.

        When I was single, I would let the place warm up during the day, and only have the A/C kick on just before I got hom, and then turn off at 8am. Back then my electricity bill on 1800 sq ft of A/C space was < $90/month. LOL.

        Now that I work out of the house, I can't get away with it. BUT I pay close attention. Most people never read the bill. The first 750 KWh of power are discounted. So, I always tried to stay below that number.

        I keep the humidity in the house about 45-50% above 50% and you start increasing the risk of mold, which I am quite sensitive to.

        The one that annoys me is the water heater. They got smart in FL and started putting them in the garage where the ambient temp reaches 120. I turn mine down a few degrees. A huge savings.

        But How hard would it be to put a small black bladder on the roof of the garage, and a simple pump. When the water up there is hot, just cycle the water through the pump and use far less electricity keeping the hot water hot. Sized appropriately, it could probably cut the electrical usage in Florida by 30-50% (for HW heaters)!

        But everything matters. Vents need to seal against the wall/ceiling. Windows and doors should close tightly. You will always have some loss. But a huge percentage is easy to reduce.

        There is a YT Channel I love. Matt Reisinger (The Build Show).
        he goes through crazy levels of stuff and new people are coming up with cheaper and easier ways to get to 90% of what he spends a lot doing. That's the real value, to me. Stud Pack is another good one to watch. Father and Son doing house work!
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by 1 month ago
          Good to hear about your upgrades, CapnK. Thanks for the sources, too!
          I mentioned my granddad's house before, where we all (about 20-30 of us) met each summer when I was younger.
          He had a water tank on the roof over the 'beach' shower.
          We almost always had hot water for showers coming back from beach or fishing outings in the summer in NC.
          (Sometimes the girls/women used more than the tank held, but in summer a cool shower wasn't a big issue.;^)
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ pixelate 1 month ago
    All of this crap is so predictable and is a known misallocation of energy-production resources. The solar garbage is bad, at least lots of it remains at ground level. The real visually toxic crap consists of the wind debacle machines. The claim is that the parts are recycled. They are not -- due to the enormous recycling costs to get anything of value from them. Instead, they are blasted at the base, fall over, the debris is cut up and placed in landfills. 15 years out, the world will have around 800,000 of these things rotting on land, and worse, the ones just off-shore. There will not be the economic excess energy capacity for their removal; instead, they will just rot in the wind, as the decades roll by, the blades will wither and fall off. Unlike the great structures of the past, such as the Pyramids of Egypt and the Americas, or the Great Wall of China, the wind scrap will be a visual blight on the landscapes over literally millions of square miles. The march of political insanity would appear to have little opposition.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ rainman0720 1 month ago
    "Despite the vast footprint, it was rated at only 350 MW. At noon at peak production it could generate about half of what one forty year old coal fired turbine makes all day every day, and every night too."

    This passage sounds much more satirical than real; sometimes The Bee's articles are based on fact and are more sad than funny. This almost feels like one of those. I know it wasn't from The Bee, but it sure could have been.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Comment deleted.

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo