17

Hurricane Odile and Inventions

Posted by dbhalling 9 years, 7 months ago to Technology
48 comments | Share | Flag

I have had the fortune or misfortune to be dealing with the aftermath of Hurricane Odile http://www.weather.com/news/weather-hurr.... I have a client that has an invention that would have been able to restore power in just two days. His invention is described in patent number 7589640 http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7589640.... It senses the force load on a power pole and if it exceeds a certain level, the invention lowers the cross bars and power lines gently to the ground and turns off the sector switch (power). Once the electrical lines and cross bars are on the ground, the wind loads are almost eliminated, which means the power pole is standing at the end of the storm. Utility workers then remove the debris and use a winch type mechanism to raise the power lines and cross bars.
This invention cannot only save billions of dollars in utility repair damage per year, get power up in a tenth the time of present techniques, eliminate billions in lost business per year, it also reduces the risk of injury to utility workers who are no longer required to climb utility poles and bystanders. But that is not all, the inventor has engineered his poles so that they are less expensive to install originally than present utility poles.
GUESS WHO is opposing the inventor? Unions. Their members make a lot of money working storms and they don’t want any system that allows less skilled workers to setup utility poles. Utility companies are ambivalent, because they are regulated and only allowed a certain return on capital. Thus, all the money they save using the inventor’s system will not improve their bottom line one iota. This is just another example of how a regulation stifles inventions and makes our lives worse, more expensive and less safe.


All Comments

  • Posted by $ jlc 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I am going for what I consider a 'robust' house. Since I live in SoCal, I am going to put solar on my roof - which will provide me with power for most of the year. We have a few times during the year when there are clouds for a couple of weeks at a time - and solar is not much good during those periods. If 'something bad happens during those cloudy weeks, I am SOL. (I do not intend for my house to be off grid, just guarded against calamity.) The level of generator system I can afford would only provide power for a few hours...

    I know that jbrenner has an enviable power pallet design (again, beyond my budget). Do you have any suggestions?

    Jan
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by slfisher 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    the way we do what things?

    The biggest change I'd like to make is to make it easier for people to generate their own power; the power companies often limit it or put arduous charges on it using specious reasoning.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jlc 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You are way ahead of me there: So what is the main thing you would do to improve 'the way we do things' using our current tech?

    Jan
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by slfisher 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I'm not quite a city planner, but I am trained in some aspects of it and I have some familiarity with such things.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jlc 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    My house had to have the 'high-tech sewage treatment system' instead of a regular septic tank because the soil permeability test was too high. My high tech septic system has algae growing in it and turns out water that is virtually pure.

    The reason for my bringing this up in a prior post, slfisher, is that we have gotten to a point where most suburban homes with most soil conditions could actually support local treatment of sewage and recycling of water for agricultural purposes (eg watering your lawn or orchard). While you (as an individual who is presumably not in the construction industry) have no particular reason to know about such high-tech sewage treatment systems, an architect or a builder or a city planner should know about these - but they continue to build Better Homes and Gardens style houses.

    The topic on this thread is 'we do not have to wait for the future we can do better with what we already have'. My contributions have been some ways that I see as being better...but which lie well within our current model of technology.

    Jan
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by slfisher 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Septic's great -- my previous house had one -- but it doesn't scale that well and not all soils can support it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by plusaf 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    When we took our loot from selling our CA home and moved to NC, we were leaving earthquakes behind (for the most part) but the apprehension of ice storms and hurricanes led me to purchase a WAY-overkill home generator system despite the underground power here.

    It has provided literally an two or three hours of backup power when the mains failed... over the past nine years we've been here.

    Of course, back in Cupertino, Silly-con Valley, a utility crew once drilled through one of the few main power feeds for the entire city of Cupertino, taking out a good portion of the city's power supply for several days... Nothing is fool-proof because there are VERY resourceful fools all around...

    :)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Let's hope! (db face paddle is crossing his girl jean pant legs....he doesn't have any fingers.)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by jimslag 9 years, 7 months ago
    As for buried lines, my utility also serves Santa Fe (yes, the People's Republic of Santa Fe), that liberal bastion. Anyway, they made us bury all the power lines within the city limits. They needed to train a few people, who are all stationed in Santa Fe, to service those lines and vaults. Lots of problems, especially if you live in areas with a high water table. Not likely, out in the desert SW, but if you live anywhere east of the Mississippi River, it could be an issue.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by jimslag 9 years, 7 months ago
    Hi, I work for one of the utilities and yes I am stuck in a union because I am NOT in a Right To Work State (New Mexico). SO I had to join a union to get the job. Anyway, I thought it was a cool idea and I forwarded the link to my supervisor and my engineer to see what they think. Will let you know if I get any feedback from them.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    LOL... sorry I know it's not funny... I have no idea what insanity you guys must be going through. :( Are they giving any kind of eta for the power to be back on? I wish I could have a drone drop some buckets of ice and some beers on your doorstep. (I'm sure that tech is out there too, but being shat on by someone.)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jlc 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    No. Not quite enough. I used to do the maintenance on my old 67 VW notchback myself*. I never did the valve settings without bloody knuckles...and have you tried to change the sparkplugs on a VW with a pancake engine?! It is a job for Heinlein's 'six armed monkey' repairman.

    Whine! Whine!

    Jan
    *Yes, I still have that car - though Betsy is not running right now.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by xthinker88 9 years, 7 months ago
    In Philadelphia, the Comcast Center was a huge LEED certified construction project. In order to be more "green" it was designed with flushless urinals. The unions protested because of all the pipe that would not have to be installed. Licenses & Inspections listened to the union line and required the builder to install miles of plumbing to the bathrooms that would not be used with the urinals but would be there "just in case" the flushless urinal idea ended up in the toilet. So much for "green". Funny to see two liberal causes clash in such an obvious way.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Timelord 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Were I the CEO of that utility I would quietly file that brilliant idea away and when the time came to bid out that contract again I'd make sure that politically connected service company didn't win the bid.

    Or alternately call up politician's brother's company and amend the contract such that they perform the lubricant application every year. It would provide much steadier work than line repair.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jlc 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I was thinking more of a berm with a hollow concrete tunnel in it - mostly above ground. (This would be similar to many of the sections of Roman aqueduct - man high tunnels that had channels that contained water in the bottom.) The cables would not have dirt piled around them, but would run down the tunnel (in a secondary conduit or free). The tunnel can also contain water lines, phone lines, gas lines, etc. On the outside, the tunnel should be amply banked - enough so that if a car hit it the car would go 'over' instead of 'into' and so that in rural areas a farmer could drive his tractor over the top (if it ran through his fields). This would take much more money to construct, but would provide a safe access and work environment for technicians to repair problems and should result in a lot fewer problems (ice storm breakages) over time. I have no idea what the ROI would be - less time in the northern ice areas or in southern hurricane areas, I would think.

    Oh yeah: in cities, the berm would be planted and would provide longitudinal parks crisscrossing the city.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Timelord 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "... one should not build utilities on any scale such that you have to tear up a street or a concrete pad or a wall in order to repair them"

    I consider it a black mark on the reputation of my fellow engineers that they don't seem to design things with repairs in mind. Sometimes the cost to build a system with easy access for repairs is just too high compared with the anticipated frequency of malfunction.

    But other times is just seems like sloppy work.

    Take a situation that many of us encounter - a very simple maintenance item on your car, like an oil change, air filter change or cabin air filter change. I had a 2000 Buick Regal that I loved, but I never once replaced the air filter without bloody fingers and prodigious amounts of cursing. Sometimes the neighbors gathered 'round just to witness the event. My current Mazda 6 has a large plastic shield that covers the entire bottom of the engine. The oil filter is inaccessible without removing it. It's easy to remove if the car's on a lift but nearly impossible otherwise.

    Enough off-topic ranting...
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo