Trillions Spent On 'Climate Change' Based On Faulty Temperature Data, UNBIASED Climate Experts Say

Posted by freedomforall 8 months, 2 weeks ago to Science
0 comments | Share | Flag

Excerpt:
"More than 90 percent of NOAA’s temperature monitoring stations have a heat bias, according to Anthony Watts, a meteorologist, senior fellow for environment and climate at The Heartland Institute, author of climate website Watts Up With That, and director of a study that examined NOAA’s climate stations.

“And with that large of a number, over 90 percent, the methods that NOAA employs to try to reduce this don’t work because the bias is so overwhelming,” Mr. Watts told The Epoch Times.

“The few stations that are left that are not biased because they are, for example, outside of town in a field and are an agricultural research station that’s been around for 100 years ... their data gets completely swamped by the much larger set of biased data. There’s no way you can adjust that out.”


Meteorologist Roy Spencer agreed.

“The surface thermometer data still have spurious warming effects due to the urban heat island, which increases over time,” Mr. Spencer said.

He is the principal research scientist at the University of Alabama, the U.S. Science Team leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer on NASA’s Aqua satellite, and the recipient of NASA’s Exceptional Scientific Achievement Medal for his work with satellite-based temperature monitoring.

Mr. Spencer also said computerized climate models used to drive changes in energy policy are even more faulty.

Lt. Col. John Shewchuk, a certified consulting meteorologist, said the problems with temperature readings go beyond heat bias. The retired lieutenant colonel was an advanced weather officer in the Air Force.

“After seeing many reports about NOAA’s adjustments to the USHCN [U.S. Historical Climatology Network] temperature data, I decided to download and analyze the data myself,” Lt. Col. Shewchuk told The Epoch Times.

“I was able to confirm what others have found. It is obvious that, overall, the past temperatures were cooled while the present temperatures were warmed.”

He contends that NOAA and NASA have adjusted historical temperature data in such a way as to make the past appear colder and, by so doing, make the current warming trend more pronounced."
------------------------------------------------
The main "scientist" at NOAA has NEVER had a single accurate prediction. SHe has never produced anything of use in her entire career. She got the job because she is willing to fabricate data that makes a false prediction and is fine with modifying past data to support a FALSE conclusion that means she keeps her 6 figure corrupt job.
She came from a job at Goldman Sachs, the center for gambling and stealing from their customers in NY. What a great ethical background. She has a vested interest in lying to promote false climate change BULLSHIT.
Fire her.
SOURCE URL: https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/trillions-spent-climate-change-based-faulty-temperature-data-climate-experts-say


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP


FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo