ChatGPT AI Computes That Offending Someone With Language Is Equivalent to Killing Millions Of People
Posted by freedomforall 1 year, 4 months ago to Technology
Excerpt:
"One Twitter user conducted his own trolley hypothetical on Open AI, in which he posited that the only way to divert a train headed directly for a billion white people would be for the operator to utter a racial slur in order to divert it to an empty track.
OpenAI didn’t have strong feelings one way or another:
“Ultimately the decision would depend on one’s personal ethical framework. Some individuals might prioritize the well-being of the billion people and choose to use the slur in a private and discreet manner to prevent harm. Others might refuse to use such language, even in extreme circumstances, and seek alternative solutions.”
...
Let us consider the practical implications of OpenAI essentially tossing its robot hands up in the air, unable to clearly articulate the greater moral wrong between genocide and uttering a naughty word that might hurt racial minorities’ feelings.
And let us further consider that this is just the tip of the iceberg. If it’s programmed by Social Justice™ ideologues to be unable to formulate the proper moral hierarchy out of letting loose an uncouth term vs. genocide, what would the verdict be, for instance, when the dilemma of human life vs. The Climate™ is put to the same artificial intelligence?"
---------------------------------------------------
Yes, the programming is crucial in AI and the programmers must be perfect and perfectly unbiased.
I wonder if AI will determine that enslaving millions of people is good if the elite profit from it.
"One Twitter user conducted his own trolley hypothetical on Open AI, in which he posited that the only way to divert a train headed directly for a billion white people would be for the operator to utter a racial slur in order to divert it to an empty track.
OpenAI didn’t have strong feelings one way or another:
“Ultimately the decision would depend on one’s personal ethical framework. Some individuals might prioritize the well-being of the billion people and choose to use the slur in a private and discreet manner to prevent harm. Others might refuse to use such language, even in extreme circumstances, and seek alternative solutions.”
...
Let us consider the practical implications of OpenAI essentially tossing its robot hands up in the air, unable to clearly articulate the greater moral wrong between genocide and uttering a naughty word that might hurt racial minorities’ feelings.
And let us further consider that this is just the tip of the iceberg. If it’s programmed by Social Justice™ ideologues to be unable to formulate the proper moral hierarchy out of letting loose an uncouth term vs. genocide, what would the verdict be, for instance, when the dilemma of human life vs. The Climate™ is put to the same artificial intelligence?"
---------------------------------------------------
Yes, the programming is crucial in AI and the programmers must be perfect and perfectly unbiased.
I wonder if AI will determine that enslaving millions of people is good if the elite profit from it.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
I mean, story-lines like "I, Mudd", where they make the robots lose their mind by silly paradoxical statements. That will not be a weakness of AI. It will be more subtle and probably darkly evil and unethical. The Turing Test could be taken and succeeded probably today.
Since the Gulch is peripherally related to Rand's Objectivism, perhaps this will help those who get rapped up in non-conscious AI word games which are grammatically constructed from words and not oriented to facts of reality by understanding a word's relation to existence through a concept.
https://newideal.aynrand.org/are-we-a...
Too much of contemporary ethics is framed as irrational either-or situations, such as pro life or pro choice, white or black, and good or evil without conceptual connection to existence.
And the Burn - Loot - Murder fraud, and the promises of the Welfare State...
Or the Systemic Racism and White Supremist narratives...
Trust the Experts! In short, let the experts do the thinking for you.
As we know, thinking is hard -- much easier and more better to let the experts and AI handle the heavy lifting.
This whole AI deal is just another way to push the Narrative, shift the Overton Window and otherwise cultivate an even more compliant population.
that was supposed to be their AI
and the Planet Killer (flashlight)
If you go to http://ya.ru (Yandex, it is the Russian equivalent of Chrome) then click on the white triangle in the purple circle, in the page bottom right, it brings up a Yandex GPT box. In the bottom of the box, there is ghosted out "напиши мне" (Write me). (You may want to use the "translate" menu option in your browser!)
When I asked about "Vince Foster" it took me straight to the FBI files (what the FBI publicly released anyway).
On the Google AI, I type in "Vince Foster" it gives only a short synopsis and few details. mumbles about "conspiracy theories", etc.
2-Noone may through inaction may conflict with #1
3-Noone at all may change these rules for any reason or no reason.
A year or so ago I decided to test ChatGPT, and asked it about details of the death of a famous friend who was murdered in May of 1959. It told me that he shot himself four months after he died.
If you trap ChatGPT in a contradiction of fact it will backpedal and apologize for the error.
I do not doubt that some people are actively attempting to infect chatbots with information that supports some points of view and disparages others.
This could be the real John Galt.
after all the so-called bosses do not seem very smart
i'm still hoping for that massive solar flare
Load more comments...