Might be a good idea seeing that democrap men seem to always have the "Rag On"!

I don't like (and never did) like to be lectured about nonsense that it was "unladylike" to walk in a natural manner (with the right leg in the right track and the left leg in the other), and that no man would want to marry me if I didn't walk on a line twitching my butt back and forth. (My father said he didn't want to support an old-maid daughter, implying that I would have to get married in order to be supported, which I regarded as prostitution.) When I saw a short remark in a magazine that, according to a certain
doctor, "The wiggle in a woman's walk is strictly put-on" (words in the magazine), I made sure to show it to my parents; they looked at it as if they thought well, there might be something to that. Neither one of them ever bothered me about it again. (That doctor should be a hero to me; I wish I had written down his name at the time.)
But as much as I despise notions about the sexes that are built on unnatural nonsense that has nothing to do with reality, there are certain physical facts about reality. What need has a man for a sanitary napkin or tampon? Why would a woman need to buy a rubber condom in a women's bathroom? I suppose that a free-enterprise business has a right to market these products if it chooses--but there is no reason why it should be mandated by law. People now-
adays want to defy nature and reality.

I seriously doubt this will 'catch' on. I'll bet none of the 'boys' will want to admit they are having their period! NB

when you face a contradiction, check your assumptions. One of them is false (i.e. Men do not menstruate). omg. schools right?

If they are that foolish, perhaps they won't have sense enough to come in from the cold.