19

The Very Definition Of A Kangaroo Court Show Trial - Deutsche Bank Destroys New York AG's Case Against Trump

Posted by freedomforall 2 years, 6 months ago to Politics
51 comments | Share | Flag

Excerpt:
"A Deutsche Bank executive may have just tanked New York Attorney General Letitia James' lawsuit against former President Donal Drump - which revolved around portraying the German lender as Trump's biggest victim in an alleged scheme to inflate his assets in order to obtain favorable terms from banks and insurers.



David Williams, who directly worked on at least one of several loans obtained by Trump over several decades, testified on Tuesday in Manhattan that it's "atypical, but not entirely unusual" for a bank to internally slash a client's stated asset values by 50% and approve a loan anyway, as they did with Trump, Bloomberg reports.

"It just depends on the circumstances," said Williams, a managing director at the bank.

Deutsche Bank, which loaned hundreds of millions of dollars to Trump for properties in Miami, Chicago and Washington, cut his stated net worth in 2011 and 2012 from about $4.2 billion to $2.3 billion, according to internal bank credit memos. The same documents indicated the bank approved the loans anyway because it expected them to generate a profit based on Trump’s history of successful developments and other criteria.

Trump, who denies wrongdoing and claims the case is politically motivated, is calling to the stand this week four current and former Deutsche Bank employees — including the family’s former private banker Rosemary Vrablic — as part of his defense case, seeking to flip the script on the state’s version of events. -Bloomberg

The testimony completely undermines AG James' premise, that Trump defrauded the German bank."
------------------------------------------------
The judge is biased and should be disbarred
The AG is biased and should be disbarred.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by term2 2 years, 6 months ago
    Cool. I hope that black prosecutor gets fired for trying to look good without doing her homework
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by rhfinle 2 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Even if they take Trump off the ballots, Even if he's in jail,I'll waste my vote for (whatever RINO) and write him in next year.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by NealS 2 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I just hope I live that long. I hate to miss out when the pendulum swings the other way.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by NealS 2 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Was that a typo, didn't you mean, "how much government has been rational since 2009, January 20th, 2009 to be specific?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Dobrien 2 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes, Trump is not the same, he is a real human who has sacrificed , risked his families life and security to get rid of the vermin. Reardon and Rourke are fictional characters. Rothschild bag man, (Soros), his bought and paid for DA's are doing the Deep States bidding to take down their greatest threat. That threat is President Donald J Trump He has said "never ever ever give up" and he hasn't.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 2 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Short answer: cases were brought in NY and DC because both the judges and jury pools are so biased there is no way he could have received a fair trial in either place. Both cases may require Supreme Court intervention just to get the trial courts to do their plain jobs.

    The real purpose of both cases, of course, as well as the Florida case, is to stop Trump's reelection, either by putting him in jail or just using gag orders so that he can't campaign. Luckily he got a decent judge in Florida, who is having none of it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CrustyOldGeezer 2 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    A GUILTY decision gives the CONVICTED 6 WEEKS to appeal ONE TIME, then execution!!!

    No more 40 years on DEATH ROW due to endless appeals.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Eyecu2 2 years, 6 months ago
    Obvious truths are meaningless in the incessant pursuit of the rightful winner of the 2020 election. They cannot allow him a moments respite from their hounding of him. Otherwise he would be free to act as the VAST majority of American citizens would have him act and thereby destroy the actions of the evil people behind the scenes.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 2 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Since it's all part of a plan with the goal of (another) coup d etat, the penalty for such treason is death.
    This also is the only way to insure that the punishment isn't pardoned by the next Deep State puppet.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mhubb 2 years, 6 months ago
    facts do not matter to liberals
    that is why they are liberals
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 2 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Here's the other question: since no one can show harm, why was the lawsuit even allowed to be filed? None of the banks were defrauded - in all cases the loans were repaid properly. And the AG can't show a single citizen of New York who was defrauded through taxes or other means.

    This is a bogus trial which should have been thrown out as soon as it was filed. I agree with ffa: both the AG and the judge should be removed and disbarred.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CrustyOldGeezer 2 years, 6 months ago
    I think there is a GROWING NUMBER of judges and DA's that are in a serious NEED FOR LOSS OF CITIZENSHIP!

    ACTIVELY DENYING ANOTHER CITIZEN OF HIS/HER RIGHTS should carry and AUTOMATIC loss of their own citizenship!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 2 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Your prediction strikes me dino as quite probable.
    In fact, the word "likely" up and jumped into my head after I wrote the above. We'll see . . .
    Now "very likely" appeared. Stop that, dino.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 2 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I predict the same. Of 92 indictments levied I figure he's going to be nailed on about 5% of them "just because" the Soviet courts and selected juries aren't going to go away empty handed. They're going to want SOME BLOOD for their time and trouble and actual guilt is irrelevant. The MSMM will have it no other way, either, and will provide plenty of smoke and cover for whatever ridiculous "guilty" verdicts are fabricated.

    They will get him so they can get us. See the Jan 6 monkey trials.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 2 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Agreed, FFA, but I think irrationality has been creeping into the US government long before 2019, LOL!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 2 years, 6 months ago
    I could be wrong, but me dino predicts Trump will be found guilty because libtarded for sick and evil twisted wannabe commies just plain want him to be.
    Evidence? We not need no stinkin' evidence. Orange Man Bad!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 2 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It's NY vs Trump in 2023. It doesn't have to be rational.
    If you are a patriotic, thinking American, how much government action has been rational since 2019?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • 10
    Posted by $ Olduglycarl 2 years, 6 months ago
    We all assume that the case was just blown away because that is observable reality but reality doesn't count for squat these days . . . we must remember, Trump finds himself in "Bizarro's" world.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • 12
    Posted by dave42 2 years, 6 months ago
    Why is this even a criminal trial, brought by a state AG?

    If Trump overstated asset values, and as a result Deutsche Bank (DB) approved a larger loan than it otherwise would have but the loan was repaid, then there's no foul. DB should be more careful in future dealings with Trump.
    If DB gave Trump a lower interest rate than it would have otherwise, DB might have recourse under the terms of the loan agreement. However, any legal action is up to DB, not the state.
    If Trump defaulted on the loan, they could sue Trump to seize assets to satisfy the loan. Again, this is up to DB, not the state.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Markus_Katabri 2 years, 6 months ago
    Deutsche Bank has bigger problems than to play “Gotcha Games” apparently. December 15th may be a pivotal day according to some sources. Alienating the ACTUAL “Most popular president ever” may not be a winning move.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo