14

Coming Soon: Your Travel Will Be Restricted By Personal Carbon Allowances

Posted by markjr 5 months, 1 week ago to Politics
39 comments | Share | Flag

“Experts suggest” your standard of living be reduced by over 85%.

Even now, faceless technocrats, climate ideologues and the ubiquitous "experts" are mapping out, divvying up and apportioning your travel quotas for the future - all based on your personal carbon footprint.

It's part of an overall plan to reduce your standard of living by upwards of 85%...
SOURCE URL: https://bombthrower.com/coming-soon-your-travel-will-be-restricted-by-personal-carbon-allowances/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • 11
    Posted by mccannon01 5 months, 1 week ago
    It's not about climate! It's about how much control the busy body control freaks have over us serfs. If during a freezing cold winter they limit the gas my furnace can burn, then I'll have to burn more wood in my fireplaces. People will not lay down and die in the cold because some control freak whacko created an ordinance to turn off the heat.

    Hell, do you think they would stop me from my 2 mile walk every morning because I'm breathing too much?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by rhfinle 5 months ago
      Be careful. In more 'progressive' areas they frown on building homes with fireplaces / wood stoves. Soon having one will prevent your being able to get homeowner's insurance. We badly need a constitutional amendment that says government will not interfere with a citizen's basic needs.

      On the 2-mile walk, just don't vent off the waste gas from last night's chili beans. They'll give you the cow treatment.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by mccannon01 5 months ago
        Right you are about fireplaces, but mine were built in the '80s. My biggest worry is the control freaks here in the Peoples Republic of New York have yearly been proposing the state legislature outlaw wood burning. Fortunately they have not succeeded - funny how the control freaks can continuously press for their agenda and once they get it all discussion ends. My wife is from the North Country up on the St. Lawrence where winter temps can easily go down to -20 or -30 many times throughout the winter and wood heat supplementation for many is a must.

        LOL, flatulence collection may be needed to burn for heat later!
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 5 months, 1 week ago
    I'm thinking I need a coal-fired generator in case the power goes out, just to give the finger they deserve.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by rhfinle 5 months ago
      I've bought a couple of wood-burning stoves, and have 400 acres of trees to fuel them with.Just in case.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by CaptainKirk 5 months ago
        So, if we could burn the ILLEGAL ALIENS as fuel, could we get carbon credits for BOTH reduction of their carbon footprints, and using a RENEWABLE source that shows no signs of stopping?

        Asking for a Friend with wood-burning stoves, and ACRES of land who might need to spare a few trees... LOL
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ Snezzy 5 months ago
        Wood warms you not just once, not just twice, but several times. Cutting is best done in winter.
        (1) Cut it down. (Many videos out there that'll show you how to NOT do it!)
        (2) Remove branches.
        (3) Cut to stove length.
        -- 1, 2, and 3 can be done with an axe or two-man saw if you don't have a chain saw.
        (4) Split, using wedges, not your axe.
        (5) Stack to dry.
        (4.5) Build a shelter to keep the wood dry.
        (6) Carry dry wood to stove.
        (7) Burn wood and feel warm.

        1 through 5 are all hard work and will keep you warm.

        Use appropriate methods to avoid chimney fires. A friend (W1ZBE, SK) had a free-standing chimney made of firebrick, set away from his house. To clean it he would start a chimney fire in it. Most of the rest of us hire (or ought to hire) a chimney sweep. If you hear something that sounds like a freight train running through your house, you have a chimney fire.

        If you get to doing large-scale harvesting of wood, you can get a couple of horses who know how to snake logs through the forest. You only need two men, one hitches the log to the horse out in the forest, and the other unhitches at the destination and sends the horse back. No need to try to lead the horse if he knows the job.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by rhfinle 5 months ago
          I quite agree about it keeping you warm multiple times, but I've had my coronary arteries re-arranged, and they told me to go easy with some of that, so I occasionally let Messrs Stihl and Poulan help me with that.

          My uncle saw a chimney fire once and gave a pretty scary description. I bought a set of chimney brushes to fit my flue, so I take care of that myself. It's not difficult, just dirty. Wear an RZ mask. I had been hiring a certified chimney sweep, but when I went in myself, it was astonishing how much creosote he had left in the corners and crevices.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Snezzy 5 months ago
    My wife did some calculations on what happens if we limit the access to energy as suggested by the climate reformers. We get 17th-century technology, but with less burning of coal and wood, and with more freezing to death, starvation and slavery. One of the goals, reduced population, will occur as a natural consequence. Malthus failed to predict the industrial revolution, but limiting our carbon feetprint can set it aside.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by rhfinle 5 months ago
      With communist China generating all the pollution they want to, under those conditions I would expect the world carbon footprint to increase anyway. After all, someone has to produce all those widgets that the US and Europe can no longer make, due to our own government restrictions.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ Snezzy 5 months ago
        Do you believe that the so-called carbon footprint is actually environmentally bad? If I am not mistaken there was more CO2 in the atmosphere in earlier times, maybe much more. Also, how are we to know whether the methods for measuring CO2 are correct, and how are we to know that the level of CO2 drives the global temperature? And what IS global temperature? "It feels hotter now than is did (n) years ago," seems rather unscientific.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by rhfinle 5 months ago
          Patrick Moore, who worked with Greenpeace early on, and got kicked out for not toeing the party line, has brought up the fact that atmospheric CO2 is actually much lower that in the Carboniferous era and has been steadily declining for hundreds of millions of years - to the point that without human intervention, it would have soon dropped to levels too low for plants to use, which would have caused a serious "extinction-level event". His thesis is that it's not the CO2 that causes global warming, and that we actually need more of it.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by CaptainKirk 5 months ago
          According to NOAA data, which I downloaded and pushed through Excel, and graphed.

          We spent MILLIONS of years with CO2 at 20-30 TIMES current levels. AND through ICE AGES.

          One would think that a SIMPLE DOUBLING of CO2 would have melted all of that ice. But it's not a SOURCE of warmth. The SUN is. Just ask Pluto.

          And we are NEAR HISTORIC LOWS of CO2. That's The FUNNY PART. So they are measuring an UPSWING from historic lows.

          It's all magic based on where you start your data, and the SCALE you use to graph it!
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 5 months, 1 week ago
    They'll need to go to the digital currency first. So, that should happen while Biden is president...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by UncommonSense 5 months, 1 week ago
      Negative. Keep an eye out for what Congress (opposite of Progress) decides in June '25 ~ that's when they have to face the decision to raise the debt limit. Now consider: what will happen IF they can't come to an agreement and the US defaults on the debt?

      The dollar becomes no different than the Weimar Republic's currency. And everyone here knows how that ended. The scary part is what happens to the valuation of everyone's 401k. But don't worry, they already have FedNow in place and ready for wide-scale adoption. Peace & safety, peace & safety! (squawks the parrot MSM)...
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ blarman 5 months ago
        A sane country would adjust its spending, pay off its debt, and stop printing money. Unfortunately, the Democrats and their RINO counterparts are anything but sane. I expect them to intentionally flush.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Ben_C 5 months ago
    CO2 represents .04% of the earths atmosphere. Once this becomes common knowledge I suspect there will be a revolt when people begin to suffer. For me the most current relevant movie is Hunger Games. Substitute energy for food and bingo its real. Covid proved that governments can control the populations with fear. Knowledge fixes this problem.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo