15

Election Group Slapped With RICO Says It Can Prove Trump Won Georgia In 2020. (Since That Is Their Defense, the State Must supply Voting Records)

Posted by freedomforall 2 years, 7 months ago to Politics
13 comments | Share | Flag

Excerpt:
"Mr. Floyd was charged on Aug. 14 alongside the 45th president and 17 other co-defendants with violating Georgia’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, conspiracy to commit solicitation of false statements and writings, and influencing witnesses.

He was the only defendant to spend time in jail due to the indictment before he was released on bond on Aug. 30.

“Your Honor, this case isn’t about whether you or I think that Donald Trump lost the election. It’s about what Mr. Floyd believed at the time,” noted Chris Kachouroff, one of Mr. Floyd’s defense attorneys, at a Nov. 3 hearing before Judge Scott McAfee.

“It’s also [about] what the false statements are alleged to have been, and indeed, are they really false,” he said.

Opening the Door
The judge ordered the hearing in response to motions to quash three sweeping subpoenas Mr. Floyd’s legal team served to the office of Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, the Fulton County Clerk of Courts, and the Fulton County Board of Elections.

Materials the attorneys requested included the ballot images and envelopes for all absentee ballots cast in the 2020 general election, all absentee ballot application forms, reports from the Dominion voting machines used, and all laptops and poll pads used by election workers, along with other documents, files, and drives.

Attorneys also requested all documents and recordings concerning the secretary of state’s post-election investigation into allegations of election fraud.

“The state chose to open this door,” Mr. Kachouroff said. “It is a broad and sweeping complaint. They opened the door wide open for us to walk in and ask for these things.”"


All Comments

  • Posted by $ jdg 2 years, 6 months ago
    The actual legal challenge to the vote in Georgia did not assert proof that Trump won. They only needed to show that enough illegal votes were cast to change the outcome. But the case was illegally not heard.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by katrinam41 2 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Watching the results coming in that night, we were horrified to watch IN REAL TIME, over 130,000 votes removed from Trump and added to Bidamn in Pennsylvania. If we had blinked, we would have missed it. I couldn't believe I'd seen what I saw, so I backed up the broadcast and there it was. I agree, AmericanWoman. I've been voting for54 years and I was gobsmacked!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Dobrien 2 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    At the date of the election reportedly the US had 136 million registered voters. 81 million BuyDem 74million Trump , so 20 million more votes as they say “doesn’t add up”. Trump has all the evidence and will use it just like this case. As Q said many times “how do you introduce evidence in a corrupt system? A. In a court of law.”
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 2 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes, its very unlikely, having a very low probability in even one battleground state.
    Having that take place in every battleground state in the same time frame is so
    unlikely that in a free country there would have been immediate independent
    investigation into every single instance.
    Add to that
    1) the video evidence showing vote counting done by democrat agents
    purposely against the laws requiring verification by republican observers
    2) the video evidence of ballot box stuffing (harvesting) by paid democrat
    agents
    3) computer evidence of tampering with computer voting machines, etc.

    The 2020 election result was a fraud and an act of treason by every
    government power who opposed investigation or who refused to hear
    the evidence.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by rainman0720 2 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    And if the election had, in fact, been fair, you wouldn't have seen it this time, either. There is just no way in Hell someone gains over a million votes between midnight and 5am.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 2 years, 7 months ago
    I wish them complete and utter success even though I doubt they will be anything more than pilloried for their efforts.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • 10
    Posted by AmericanWoman 2 years, 7 months ago
    Am going to say it for the 10th or more time...have been voting for over 50 years, voted every election not that my choice always won BUT never ever did I go to bed in any time zone when a winner was clear and then wake up 5 hours (bad sleeper) to find out that thousands of votes came in after 2 am the next day with the other party had won...never.....ever!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 2 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Sounded interesting and I did a search on it to see how it was going. Near the top of the search is an article dated 2021 about the intent to sue. Then a bunch of other irrelevant stuff, but not the suit. Got any more news?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Markus_Katabri 2 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Unfortunately you’re right. If anything the results of this case will prove that we are effectively WROL (Without Rule Of Law). Act accordingly.
    He will be denied his right to prove his assertion. If the state was smart they’d dismiss the charges now. Michigan is learning it the hard way with The Iron Pig. The owners of that restaurant have done more to prevent tyranny (in their own defense from tyranny of the state) than ANY of our elected representatives. After Whitmer’s Executive orders were slow walked through the justice system and declared unconstitutional the state tried to dismiss all charges and make the unconstitutional mandates be forgotten. One restaurant said “Not so fast.” And filed suit against the Health Department for it’s unconstitutional public health orders. The goal is to set a precedent that the State does not have the authority to ever do anything like that again. Watching them try to squirm out of the trap they laid for themselves has been both frustrating and entertaining.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • 10
    Posted by mhubb 2 years, 7 months ago
    facts do not matter in this country any longer
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 2 years, 7 months ago
    IMHO, Mr. Floyd and his attorneys just don't get it. A Soviet court in a commie region of the country doesn't care what he/they think now or in the past or what he/they may think in the future. It's ONLY about the party and what it thinks.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo