13

RFK, Jr.: Climate Skeptics 'Should Be at the Hague with All the Other War Criminals'

Posted by Eudaimonia 9 years, 7 months ago to Politics
30 comments | Share | Flag

Yes, that's what we need, Science with police powers!


All Comments

  • Posted by johnpe1 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Thank You Sir! I am still looking forward to seeing
    the movie (and buying DVDs!) ....... -- j

    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    could you help me, please, winter -- to whom does
    this logo apply? I did a web search and drew
    a blank....... Thanks....... -- j

    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 9 years, 7 months ago
    What nonsense. The truth doesn't need to lock people up. Eventually people will find a solution, and all of this will disappear. The war criminal rhetoric is completely wrongheaded.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Easy to find. Went straight to it on Youtube.
    Toward the end of the interview, RFK Jr. got peeved enough to snatch at the reporter's microphone--to shut up her next irritating question it appears. Check the sidebar. The young lady questions the hypocrisy of other big name marchers.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDKWRRnS-...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That was easy. Went to Youtube and straight to it.
    Toward the end RFK, Jr. got irritated enough to grab the reporter's microphone. To shut up her last question it looks like.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDKWRRnS-...

    Check the sidebar by the video. The young lady questions the hypocrisy of other big name marchers.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 9 years, 7 months ago
    and I think that those who would drive this fine
    nation into the ditch with their traitorous political
    deviousness should be jailed, denied the vote,
    and fed nothing but saltines and water. -- j

    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ nickursis 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yet I did hear that someone had the temerity to go up to him asnd ask that he give up his gas guzzeling SUV, private plane and cell phone and he went off the deep end screaming at them. We should try to find the video of that, in order to be "fair and balanced".
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ nickursis 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Chappaquiddick, Chappaquiddick, Chappaquiddick.....whats in a name???? The public beheadings start after they secure power. A good reason to NOT let that ever happen....
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ nickursis 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Makes one wonder why the simple masses get all excited about a name. A moron is a moron,albeit a rich moron...made on the backs of honest rum runners no less...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by jerry1228 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    surprised why? there is a great deal of money to be received from the gov in the form of grants to do their bidding. if the next 5 years show a steady drop in temperature it will not change their minds. try as best you can to ignore them.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 9 years, 7 months ago
    I read a recent comment that was quite poignant. They call deniers "Flat Earthers." that is quite ironic since the original Flat Earthers were those who went along with "consensus' and thought Columbus would fall off the edge...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by BradA 9 years, 7 months ago
    My latest rant on a different climate non-science article. Certainly could be applied here.

    Typical chicken little reporting. Despite the fact that not a single one of the "peer reviewed" climate models is able to accurately, or even somewhat inaccurately, reflect reality, we're expected to worship at the alter of anthropomorphic global warming. Sorry, but your science is wrong. Or at least, it is inconsequential. One of Obama's own science advisors puts it a lot more diplomatically than I would: http://online.wsj.com/articles/climate-s....... My own bottom line from this is that we are not even remotely capable of trying to model something as complex as "the whole world." And these arrogant "climatologists" are too stupid to realize this. The basis of what they are trying to model (the effect of CO2 concentration on the earth's thermodynamics) is barely a hiccup in the context of the planet's more dominant control and feedback systems. Heck, even the IPCC's own models show that if we do take the kind of draconian measures being recommended, the resulting change in 50 or 100 years would be in the order of magnitude of noise, as far a temperatures are concerned: http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/en......

    It's time for the lemmings to wake up and smell reality.

    ------------- Edit -------------
    I just noticed that the two links above are going to 404's. As do simple cuts & pastes.
    So, if you want to find the articles, you'll have to do google searches:

    1st Article: "Climate Science Is Not Settled"
    2nd Article: "Why is the UN denying IPCC climate science?"
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by RevJay4 9 years, 7 months ago
    Another Kennedy idiot. Must be lots of inbreeding in that family. They all seem to be nuts.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 9 years, 7 months ago
    Hope that mentally twisted intolerant fascist never runs for POTUS. Think about it. Obama was both elected and reelected by whatever the heck has become of our our fellow American voters.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Teutonicus 9 years, 7 months ago
    RFK Jr. should be right there with the Koch brothers with all he hot air methane gas he is releasing into the from his mouth.
    RFK Jr. The last thing we need is more laws looking out for the public good or safety unless you are talking about getting rid of 10,000 politicians/ bureaucrats across the USA.
    Perhaps create a Politician Free Zone would work?
    Cheers LOL.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ProfChuck 9 years, 7 months ago
    Be very skeptical when a scientific "finding" supports the objectives of a particular political ideology. Real scientists know there is no such thing as "settled science". "Political Science" is an oxymoron but, unfortunately, "Politicized Science" is a very real and dangerous phenomenon.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by jerry1228 9 years, 7 months ago
    isn't it obvious that a person who inherits enough money to be idol rich is not necessarily smart. each time he opens his mouth he proves it.
    he has no memory of his grandfathers involvement in crime it appears as well.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Susanne 9 years, 7 months ago
    They want a "climate Nuremburg"? For those who don't think as they do? Why not have some public beheadings as well... They seem to be cut from that cloth...

    I'll add this to the "another shameful stain to the Kennedy name" file...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 9 years, 7 months ago
    Warming "deniers" are modern day Galileos.
    We don't need a replay of the all powerful church.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo