All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 9 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    Perhaps instead of 'consciousness', you are referring to 'conscience'. Two different concepts.
    Reply | Permalink  
    • Olduglycarl replied 9 months, 2 weeks ago
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 9 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    What is completely illogical in your philosophy, is that the rulers among us, as a class, lack a corpus callosum. Unlike those who are lower in class.
    Reply | Permalink  
    • Olduglycarl replied 9 months, 2 weeks ago
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 9 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    As you said, the potential was there and just had to be realized.

    I was still writing/editing and adding while you replied.

    Mutations...cosmic radiation is our biggest mutator and will likely act upon our bodies and brain/mind connection from this point in time and continuing till the fat micro nova sings at the end of this 12 year cycle...coming to an earth near us in about 20.
    A whole nother subject but ties in neatly in terms of our evolution.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 9 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    I believe what can be referred to perhaps, as a consciusness, a sense of ourselves and our uniqueness as humans probably began with the mutation that gave rise to Chromosome 2, and that was much further back than 3,000 years ago.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 9 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    But clearly not used or blocked. Jaynes puts mankind's (overstatement, not everyone as we observe) conscious awareness as observed in historical writings at about 3000 years ago.

    Interesting enough,about 10 years ago an actuary in Australia found that about 2500 years ago our magnetic shield got the strongest it had been.
    What does this have to do with the other you might say?

    Well it is well known that cosmic radiation affects the brain and the body. When our shields are weak, like they are now 25% weaker than that time, cosmic radiation goes off the charts and affects all sorts of behavior, malfunctions, reaction times and health in general. I propose that when our shields got stronger, blocking those cosmic rays, allowed our brains to begin to function properly thereby effectively gaining awareness of one's own awareness, gaining access to the mind and soon the realization that voice was the voice of self and introspection began to moderate not only our behavior but our way of thinking as well. Mankind at that point gained an important connection to creation.
    In Dobrian's post about the errors of Ayn Rand, there is a paragraph about Plato's Noesis and another paragraph about quantum physics . . .all of that ties in with what I am trying to convey about Consciousness and Conscience.

    I originally made this connection about consciousness/conscience/behavior through an insight I had while reading Spiral Dynamics and another book with the slightest intro to quantum physics and entanglements etc.
    Turns out, I was correct and not the only one to make this connection.

    Hmm, I am consciously human after all . . .LMAO

    PS, doesn't mean we don't screw up or suffer a temporary introspective blockage from time to time but on the whole, we can act upon our conscious introspection . . .in our own self interest, Rand would say.

    Now, it must be understood that this is Still a conversation.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 9 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    Carl, the human brain has always had a corpus callosum. Even a dog's brain has a corpus callosum. The corpus callosum IS the connection between the right and left hemispheres.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 9 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    Well, as we might observe our biblical ancestors acting upon a Voice in their heads thought to be their ancestors, their gods or their rulers. The human brain at that time had no corporation between the left and right hemispheres which prevented them from knowing that the voice was that of their own, (most probably) A Bicameral, as Jaynes would put it, could easily get along and prosper/produce with in his environment. Hell, recent studies state that perhaps 60% of the present population still has no connection to the mind, no conscious but are aware of their environment but not aware that they are aware. Def. of Consciousness. A better def. Introspective.
    The brain is amazing and can consider anything important for survival and it would be difficult to tell whether they were a conscious human or not.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 9 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes, I agree, that is funny.
    But I have been reading about Neo-think, and even what I can find about your own work: The Fight for Conscious Human Life.

    The less said the better. Meaning it seems to me to be somewhat illogical and anti-human nature.
    I guess my main objection is that you have made these "creatures" sub human by eliminating a consciousness for them. If our enemies, as you assume, are without consciousness, how are we to understand and confront them? It would be like confronting, say, a shark.

    We would have no knowledge or foresight as to what these sharks, these people might do in certain situations.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 9 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    Laughing, sorry, my fault. Black as in Evil/criminal/or otherwise with no conscience. That is how the term "Black" is used in this instance.
    These are the type of creatures that have assumed rule over our world.
    Kakistocracy: Government by the worst and least qualified,

    Ps, the black africans are no different than any other people over the world. save for the creatures I call: parasitical Humanoids, the global DELETE or my fav. The Great Unwashed. No Conscience, not conscious not human like the rest of us, (in my observation)

    Ps, studied the works of Julian Jaynes, The Bicameral Mind (should read brain) and based my work on what and whom these creatures are that assume rule over us in my book: The Fight for Conscious Human Life. (much of it was just to see if I could do it and found that maybe I should have been a writer) Have been writhing another more serious for normal publication.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 9 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    If by black you mean of Sub-Saharan African descent, you have been sold a crock of you know what. Akin to things like: it was the blacks of sub-Saharan Africa that brought enlightenment to Europe following the Dark Ages, or that it was the blacks of the Nigerian region who gave birth to the ancient Sumerians in the Cradle of Civilization. They are already positive the ancient Egyptians were of black ancestry, even though it has been pointed out to them that the Egyptians had a sense of proportion that blacks still do not have today.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 9 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    Cripto-jews, interesting. Haven't heard that one.
    But yes, there were those so called nobles that fabricated much about themselves.

    Interesting to note:Many of The black nobility claimed they were descendant of Nimrod of Babylon . . . which would make them a nephilim hybrid several steps removed...Now That''s what I call: A different race.
    But who knows, maybe they made that up too, otherwise they were just another psychopath. shaking my head.
    That's my view of them anyway.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 9 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    I find that hard to believe.

    "Jewishness" is determined by one's mother. If one's mother is a Jew, then you are a Jew. Judaism, however, is something different. Judaism refers to the religion, not the ethnicity, that is, the race.

    There were what were called 'crypto-Jews' especially after Isabella cracked down on the Jewish and Muslim population in Spain following what has become known as the Reconquista, which ended in 1492 when she received the keys to the Alhambra by the last Berber caliph, or whatever.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 9 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    Many global delete, parasitical humanoids, Nobles (as they are called) did not want to pretend to be christian or any of the other religions but settled upon being Jewish for some reason. There is a very specific ancestral test that determines if one is Jewish or not. One could, in those days change one's name, history and religious following at the drop of a hat and did so just like the trans creatures of today.

    Much like Christians, Conservatives, Capitalist (or even Columbus) being blamed for everything the opposition is actually guilty of, so too, were the Jews. Not perfect but not the creatures they are accused of being and of doing. Like today's Rino's, in name only besmirching the name and intention of actual Republicans. And, between you and I, not sure what that means anymore. That was the purpose of those pretending to be.

    In your reading, you'll come across such instances.
    Ps, Welcome, I venture you'll bring much to the table here to discuss.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 9 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    I need to clarify my comment about Obamma's statement. What he actually said was: "I can always INCITE RIOTS to prove any opposition to my policies are racially motivated".
    He said that (to me) in late spring or summer 2009.

    Can you understand why I found him unfit to wield power?
    And then he lied to my family, and others, including the blacks, telling them I was racist and that was why I didn't want to help him.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 9 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    That premise, if such it is, is definitely not something that can be evidenced. I'm not even sure what you mean by "not real Jews, only those that pretend to be or decided to be Jewish".
    Be that as it may, banking 'evolved', along with scientific thinking in Europe. I believe it was in the 12th century, the 1100's, that the initial phases were set.
    Jews were allowed to charge interest, and they charged non-Jews, just as today adherents to Islam are allowed to charge non-Muslims interest, but are forbidden by the Noble Prophet (PBUH) Mohammed from charging the faithful.
    If you think about it, what took place in those "Dark Ages" (and they WERE dark, compared to the Renaissance) in monetary thinking, was a tendency for the nobles, those whose association with the new-found profession of 'merchant' enabled them to acquire riches, to leave their jewels and such with the Jews in their midst, who then loaned it out to other nobles, and charged an interest they kept in addition. Not something that would gain friends and allies among the Christians. And yes, the Templars, before the use of letters of credit (another banking innovation) moved money around Europe and the Christian states in the Middle East. The masons came into full bloom later, as the guild of the stone cutters (the free stones) came to be known. I think, but do not know and have not researched, that Descartes may have had a hand in the attitude of the Europeans toward a sense of mysticism in the masons. (Liebniz found a book he referred to as "Descartes Notebook", wherein the astrological sign for Jupiter is used.)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 9 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    Not real Jews, only those that pretend to be or decided to be Jewish. Think, many of the Black [ig]nobility that escaped during the fall of Rome and set up camp in the swamps, (Venice) establishing central banking like the Rothschilds etc in competition to the Masons and Templar Nights. Eventually they all disappeared into one little happy group.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 9 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    Weren't there several Jews on the original panel that thought up the ACLU in the early 20th century?

    I will always hold Brandeis in reverence. Though he hated big business, he hated big government more.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 9 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    I asked the ACLU for help when I tried to flee the tentacles of Obamma. Needless to say there was no help forthcoming. I felt pretty stupid, to trust the motives of this group. And the ADL for that matter. I once sent an email to the ADL, asking if they had at any time aided the cause of Sacco and Vanzetti. They replied they had no record of that.
    I also accessed the ADL website a couple of years ago. the word "hate" was plastered all over it.

    I have the very awful feeling that we---normal Americans---have been used. And badly.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mhubb 9 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    for some reason, the Jewish TV channel is running ads for the ACLU
    i'll never watch that station again
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 9 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    My hunger for knowledge and history is predicated on the very necessary fact that unless mankind knows the TRUE AND ACTUAL AND REAL reasons for events, especially conflicts between persons and societies, he WILL repeat the very same events and situations that cause conflicts. And the revisionist historians have been very busy in the last five, six or seven decades in CREATING and manufacturing reasons, so-called, that have no connection to consequences. There is nothing more dangerous to mankind than that atrocious ability to fictionalize history,
    The Portuguese soldier-cleric in the 15th century, D'Azurara, when chronicling the actions of Prince Henry (the most underrated man in history), knew that, and even wrote why it was necessary to report the truth. I believe what he actually wrote was "...so we do not repeat the mistakes of our ancestors..."

    But the Jewish Left refers to Columbus as a murderer and Anglo-Saxons as genocidal maniacs, among other fictions. Anglo-Saxons, the very tribe of people who saved their sorry souls!!
    Ingratitude is a trait I despise. Who will save your souls the next time?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 9 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    Well, I condemn the Jewish Left. I have friends on the Conservative side: Ben Shapiro, Dennis Praguer, the owners of a small cookie factory of which I was the CFO, and a great deal of admiration for Richard Feynman. I want to make that clear.

    To call critics "anti-Semitc", reminds me of something Obamma said, to wit: "I can always say that any opposition to my policies is racially motivated." Now I don't know if he was told that by his puppet masters or if he came up with it all by himself. Probably the former, as he really is not all that bright.
    He also said "There is always a period of turmoil before Socialism sets in"; and another gem: "The concentration of power is inevitable."
    Obamma was a dupe, Dobrien, of the Jewish Left, spearheaded by the Frankfurt School, ensconced at Columbia University in 1934.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Dobrien 9 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes interesting. As I read a few of your comments it was easy to see that you have a hunger for knowledge and history. So glad you are looking into Zolls work. He seems to have a team of researchers working on this project. These enemies have often been called the Jewish Khazarian mafia. They use the Jew aspect to call any critics anti-Semitic and distract from their evil.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 9 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    I scrolled (and thought it would never end!) and wrote this comment:
    'I agree that Prussia is only incidental to the problem, in the minds of others. In fact, I refer to this 'enemy'---and it is not exactly invisible, only the movers and shakers are hidden from sight, as "the vile entanglement of Leftism and Global Deep State', whose entanglement has depended on a 'convergence'---not necessarily a similarity---of interests.'

    My comment was a reply to another poster who claimed it isn't Prussia, but Jews...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 9 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    Speaking of Jews in Obamma's admin, I am reminded of the Chicago Jew, Rahm Emmanuel, and his assertion to Obamma when I tried to leave: "How can she reject you; you're the president of the United States". Would he have said that had I been a Jewish woman?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 9 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    You seem to be referring to the July 1914 riots in St. Petersburg as 'color revolutions'. Interesting.

    Wiki has some good articles on Syndicalism and Anarcho-syndicalism, which seems to be anti-democracy and heavily involved in 'propoganda by deed', assassinations and that sort of stuff.

    I will research this guy Norm. Thanks for the 'clue'.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo