11

250 Hollywood Celebrities Sign Letter Demanding Big Tech Censor Anyone Who Opposes Trans Surgeries On Kids. "Make It So!" Says The Borg Tool.

Posted by freedomforall 10 months, 3 weeks ago to Politics
41 comments | Share | Flag

Excerpt:
"Some 250 woke Hollywood celebrities from movies, TV and music have signed their names to an open letter urging big tech companies to crack down on anyone who doesn’t fall into line with the trans agenda, including advocating life changing gender surgeries on children.

The letter was sent to the CEOs of Meta, YouTube, TikTok and Twitter by GLAAD (Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation) and the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), and was signed by hundreds of famous names including Amy Schumer, Ariana Grande, Demi Lovato, Jamie Lee Curtis, Judd Apatow, Patrick Stewart and many more.
...
The letter states that “Specific mitigations on such disinformation must be developed (for instance akin to election and COVID-19 mitigations and rules).”

So, essentially, censoring anyone who doesn’t completely advocate removing the genitals of children and sterilising them.

Recall that the “mitigations” employed by big tech against people who expressed opinions on the 2020 election and COVID-19 that were in any way divergent to the establishment narrative were to censor and altogether remove them from the platforms.

This included merely suggesting that the COVID lab leak theory, which is now the accepted probable reality of what happened by several government agencies and scientists, warranted an investigation."


All Comments

  • Posted by $ Stormi 10 months, 2 weeks ago
    Seems as if the dumbest people around (Hollywood) wants to silence anyone outside their belief clique. Never change, do they. Remember when they swore they were not in with Soviets, yet here they are commies all the while. Bet not opne read the Venona Papers showing theiy wre wrong then as tehy are now.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by lrshultis 10 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    White and black dealing with individual humans is just laziness, since degree of melanization of skin is not a valid criteria for judging an individual's character. Such attempts at any kind of diversity are an irrational waste of time. One can only judge one by his actions because his reasons for allowing his subconscious brain to act are not observable. I.e., free will is the ability for consciousness to allow the subconscious to act. The subconscious decides what it determines should happen and does that before the conscious mind allows that ready action to occur. Try moving a finger by will alone. It can't be done until the consciousness permits the subconscious to do the action of moving the finger. Thinking is the process of directing the subconsious mental activities as, say, a pianist observing his playing until an error is detected and then directing the subconscious to mend its way. It is difficult to separate consciousness from subconsciousness because it is a evolved survival mechanism for applying logic to thought and action.
    With art such as movies one should judge each work by one's own standards and not about how one believes the producer might think. Something is good or bad objectively by one's standards which are all that are available without seeing error in the standard through more observation of objective reality and logical thinking.
    Jailing for a crappy product and stealing from tax payers to pay for increasing the extremely high USA per capita incarceration rate does great harm that would not decrease the amount of crap produced. The democracy of the market can do both good and bad though, and in the meantime I will watch whatever I find interesting which is harder to do because so many artists are chasing insanity as a goal.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by lrshultis 10 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    I just don't, in my most likely autistic mind which is fully rationally selfish, collectivize institutes believing that boycotting their products will do any more than hurt my own standard of living. I vote for the product by purchasing it and not for the person selling it. I doubt whether the persons looking at the bottom line will even notice my vote or try to change their beliefs because of some hurt that I might have caused them. Everyone is an individual and have beliefs different from everyone else. I am of the reality will wipe out the badasses given enough time, view of objective reality and don't waste time changing others as long as they are peaceful. The only change I can give society is what I do with my own life and not do the collective judgements making victims of those just trying to stay alive. I don't like or cause collateral damage. Much of what happens with humans is related to the evolutionary meme driven lazy minds of those in today's complex societies where it is easier and with little down side to just believe with others. I never could do that and actively stayed away from group activity such as scouts and church. Made the best of school but not group activities like physical education or ROTC which was required for freshmen at University of Wisconsin, Madison at the time. It is now voluntary.

    All in all, trying to convert others to ones beliefs is a waste of one's time and capital. If you like a product buy, thus voting for the good and thus against the bad, and forget about imagining what irrational crap the seller allows in his mentality.

    Of course if threatened physically put a stop to it without getting touchy feelings involved.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by lrshultis 10 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    Does support of Trump make a better product?
    I voted for Trump because he was not totally evil as was Biden. That is what I was left with other than a protest or non-vote which would help Biden. I can't, for example, agree with sending more money to the government in the form of duties on imports with tariffs or his use of eminent domain to obtain property.

    https://www.cato.org/commentary/donal...

    Another's personal life is not my business as long as it is not forced upon others. I value Rand's work despite what, to me, would be her personal life. She ran her little collective (cult) with a near religious hand with a fear of being purged or excommunicated for wrong thought as do many here in the Gulch do believing that boycotting products because of the person making them being an asshole just impoverishes one's self and does nothing to make him a better person. One just diminishes his own life trying to live the lives of others.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ TomB666 10 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    Thanks - and you nailed it. Most of them could live one block from me and I wouldn't know them.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Markus_Katabri 10 months, 2 weeks ago
    Where can I find the list of 250 examples of “entertainment” I don’t need to partake of anymore?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    I agree. If you can recommend the exception that doesn't have perverse propaganda, please do.
    I enjoyed the same type that you mention, but lately they are all in my collection from pre 2000.
    I've stopped watching shows that, in the past, were good, but have become vehicles for leftist
    writers and directors to blame white males for everything and extol the superiority of women
    in traditional men's roles.
    I used to enjoy detective drama, but in writers' false fiction the villains are always white men
    while in reality blacks are 4 to 5 times more likely (per capita) to be the perpetrators.
    Somehow in tv fiction the administrators (bosses) of police are more likely to be minorities
    and the stupid, criminal,and lazy people are more likely white males, unlike reality.
    Hollywood, Netflix, and Amazon must receive a distinct, clear message.
    "You are perverted scum. Go to jail."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CTYankee44 10 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    Oh, I agree 100%.

    “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.”
    ― C. S. Lewis
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mhubb 10 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    number of "good" is now so small....
    so very, very small

    even Eastwood fell of the the planet, failing to support Trump, if i remember correctly
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by lrshultis 10 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    Why boycott the good along with the bad? I enjoy movies where the at least somewhat good battle the depraved to abject evil. I do consider most of the stuff produced by the major Hollywood studios deserving of the of there unprofitability as determined by the movie watching market. Independent studios probably make most movies and tv, much of which is crap and deservedly never got the invest back.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ katrinam41 10 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    I read that list through another link to the actual document. The expected normal bunch of big names are there, the majority are nothings wanting to be somethings. I've been boycotting certain big name movies for years and don't regret a single pass.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ TomB666 10 months, 2 weeks ago
    These links are like 'click bait' - none want to actually show the list of 250+, they just tell you it exists. At least that is what I found. Can anyone post the actual letter and signatures?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 10 months, 2 weeks ago
    Dear FFA,don't worry about these people. 'They don't live in our world. Theirs is a world of imagination. Of course, they would think what they think is real. But darling, it won't last. nb
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    I have learned from a friend that directors using such funds for personal items
    (e.g., building a new house for the director) is not at all unusual.
    Everyone who works on films must be union member, so the costs of the help
    can be very expensive. My contact was in special effects and retired a long
    time back but she made 6 figures regularly as a technician.
    Other union jobs are also very well paid.
    I have no knowledge of any money laundering.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CaptainKirk 10 months, 2 weeks ago
    The obvious solution to this is making the left live by their rules.
    #1) If you are a lefty, Abortion is Legal until the 1,200th MONTH. Can be requested by either parents, aunts/uncles/grand parents. Cannot be turned down.
    #2) If you are a LEFTY female, and want child support for an out of wedlock kid. The father (since half of those clump of cells are his), can have the abortion (His Cells, His Choice), and if you deny him the opportunity, he can CHOOSE to abandon the child (His Wallet, His Choice).
    3) A Similar process for divorce, if the non-bread winner wants anything, but they are a leftist... Then NO... The other persons right to self-determination trumps you desire to cash in and have an involuntary slave.

    BTW, why is Alimony not considered a form of Indentured Servitude/Slavery? (If both people are EQUAL, then when they separate, they are both WHOLE. Nobody should be paying anyone).

    I bet the divorce rate would drop like a rock with those changes. So would the single motherhood problem.
    And Colleges would lose a LOT of kids who go home after Freshman year and call their families RACISTS... (1-800-Abort-Now... Yeah, I have a pickup for you... Johnny... Age 20... )

    Sometimes... Giving someone what they asked for, gets them to QUESTION themselves... JUST ENOUGH to change their minds...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Aeronca 10 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    Those 100 million dollar blockbuster films must be money laundering schemes. $100 million dollars to make a 2 hour film? You watch the opening credits, you immediately see 3 or 4 shell corporations that funnel the money in. I bet with real justice those films could be shut down under RICO laws.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by bsudell 10 months, 2 weeks ago
    250 movie stars worried about their careers. Go home and go back to bed; you're annoying us.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 10 months, 2 weeks ago
    Hollywood's rife with pedos and sex maniacs. Oh, the stories. We should not take any direction from them on any of this kind of stuff. They're the weirdos in our society. I do wish they'd not give any thought about the kids. Leave the kids alone and go off and be your freaky self somewhere else...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 10 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    At least there is some sanity in the doctor's your nephew is going to. Many children aren't as privileged/protected.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 10 months, 2 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    They ever come near my kids and they'll see how applicable the Second Amendment becomes...
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo