The WEF know the “climate” isn’t “changing,” but that change can be engineered using the climate. Just the same as the “pandemic” was engineered – and for the same fundamental reason, our enslavement.
Posted by freedomforall 1 year, 10 months ago to Government
Excerpt:
"They also know – because it is obvious – that “electrification” cannot work, except in the way they intend it to. As the means toward the end they have in mind for us.
It is as absurd to believe that everyone currently driving a non-electric car will be driving an electric one (and long before the year 2050) as it was to believe that gene-altering, spike protein-inducing drugs that do not immunize are “vaccines.” Not on account of lack of desire for EVs – and leaving that supposed “desire” aside for the moment. Rather, on account of economics. GM’s Mary Barra, Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares and Ford’s Jim Farley all concede that electric cars are too expensive to be mass market cars. That selling EVs for less than $40,000 and not losing money on each “sale” is an impossibility, given materials costs and other factors.
Yet they continue to “invest” in them, regardless.
Why? Because it is a means toward an end.
It is acknowledged by the current secretary of transportation that there isn’t adequate generating capacity to power a one-for-one replacement of non-electric cars with electric cars – and that electricity is going to cost everyone a great deal more, regardless.
Yet he continues to push for new and more extreme regulations that will have the effect of leaving no alternative to electric cars – and electric stoves – that will leave people with ever-more-onerous utility bills.
These are the two arms of the pincer. “Electrification” means cars two-thirds of us won’t be able to afford to own. Or be able to power. Either way, the end result is the result desired – and now openly stated – by the WEF."
"They also know – because it is obvious – that “electrification” cannot work, except in the way they intend it to. As the means toward the end they have in mind for us.
It is as absurd to believe that everyone currently driving a non-electric car will be driving an electric one (and long before the year 2050) as it was to believe that gene-altering, spike protein-inducing drugs that do not immunize are “vaccines.” Not on account of lack of desire for EVs – and leaving that supposed “desire” aside for the moment. Rather, on account of economics. GM’s Mary Barra, Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares and Ford’s Jim Farley all concede that electric cars are too expensive to be mass market cars. That selling EVs for less than $40,000 and not losing money on each “sale” is an impossibility, given materials costs and other factors.
Yet they continue to “invest” in them, regardless.
Why? Because it is a means toward an end.
It is acknowledged by the current secretary of transportation that there isn’t adequate generating capacity to power a one-for-one replacement of non-electric cars with electric cars – and that electricity is going to cost everyone a great deal more, regardless.
Yet he continues to push for new and more extreme regulations that will have the effect of leaving no alternative to electric cars – and electric stoves – that will leave people with ever-more-onerous utility bills.
These are the two arms of the pincer. “Electrification” means cars two-thirds of us won’t be able to afford to own. Or be able to power. Either way, the end result is the result desired – and now openly stated – by the WEF."
"The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away."